In our comparison of Digital Guardian vs. Tufin, Tufin is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
DG primarily addresses endpoint Data Loss Prevention (DLP) and DAR scanning. It helps to protect sensitive data on endpoints, ensuring compliance and preventing data leakage. The product's capabilities in these areas benefit me by providing greater control and security over my data assets.
I appreciate the level of support I have received while using Digital Guardian (DG). The support team has been helpful and responsive, enhancing my experience with the product.
One drawback is the lack of management of DAR (Data at Rest) scanners within the DG Management Console (DGMC). This limitation can be inconvenient when it comes to managing and configuring the scanners.
I love this product since it is simple to use and has assisted me in automating the establishment of policies and compliance reports. However, I would like to see additional customization choices, such as personalized dashboarding.
Easy to use and learn
Customization is not easy
Digital Guardian addresses issues related to agent communication and provides data loss prevention and enhanced security measures. The DLP process effectively blocks the unauthorized transfer of confidential data, ensuring data protection and reducing the risk of data breaches.
I appreciate that Digital Guardian's Data Loss Prevention (DLP) tool plays a vital role in secure data transmission. It effectively assigns policies to individual users, ensuring data protection.
There is room for improvement in the Helpdesk Support regarding technical aspects. Customized policies for groups of applications or people are currently unavailable. The console's GUI could be more user-friendly.
We can now efficiently manage our firewall policies thanks to Tufin, a fantastic software. Its centralized interface makes managing devices from many networks simple, and its support service is top-notch. Since we started using Tufin in 2016, it has helped us save a significant amount of time and work. The cost is quite high but the advantages exceed the drawbacks.
Excellent support, centralized management and less worload
Expensive
DG primarily addresses endpoint Data Loss Prevention (DLP) and DAR scanning. It helps to protect sensitive data on endpoints, ensuring compliance and preventing data leakage. The product's capabilities in these areas benefit me by providing greater control and security over my data assets.
I appreciate the level of support I have received while using Digital Guardian (DG). The support team has been helpful and responsive, enhancing my experience with the product.
One drawback is the lack of management of DAR (Data at Rest) scanners within the DG Management Console (DGMC). This limitation can be inconvenient when it comes to managing and configuring the scanners.
Digital Guardian addresses issues related to agent communication and provides data loss prevention and enhanced security measures. The DLP process effectively blocks the unauthorized transfer of confidential data, ensuring data protection and reducing the risk of data breaches.
I appreciate that Digital Guardian's Data Loss Prevention (DLP) tool plays a vital role in secure data transmission. It effectively assigns policies to individual users, ensuring data protection.
There is room for improvement in the Helpdesk Support regarding technical aspects. Customized policies for groups of applications or people are currently unavailable. The console's GUI could be more user-friendly.
I love this product since it is simple to use and has assisted me in automating the establishment of policies and compliance reports. However, I would like to see additional customization choices, such as personalized dashboarding.
Easy to use and learn
Customization is not easy
We can now efficiently manage our firewall policies thanks to Tufin, a fantastic software. Its centralized interface makes managing devices from many networks simple, and its support service is top-notch. Since we started using Tufin in 2016, it has helped us save a significant amount of time and work. The cost is quite high but the advantages exceed the drawbacks.
Excellent support, centralized management and less worload
Expensive
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Digital Guardian vs. Tufin, Tufin has 10 user reviews and Digital Guardian has 16. The average star rating for Tufin is 4.6 while Digital Guardian has an average rating of 4.43. Tufin has more positive reviews than Digital Guardian. Comparing Digital Guardian vs. Tufin reviews, Tufin has stronger overall reviews.
Digital Guardian vs. Tufin both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Network Management, Device Management, Application Management, Reporting & Analytics, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Systems/Administrative, Configuration Management, Third-Party Integrations, Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC) Integrations. In our feature comparison of Digital Guardian vs. Tufin, Tufin offers more of the most popular features and tools than Digital Guardian.
In our pricing comparison of Digital Guardian vs. Tufin, Tufin's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to Tufin's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of Digital Guardian vs. Tufin shows that Tufin scores higher in usability for learning curve, setup & support. Digital Guardian scores higher in ease of use, meets requirements, quality of support, ease of admin, but Tufin has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
