In our comparison of Digital Guardian vs. ThreatDown, ThreatDown is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
DG primarily addresses endpoint Data Loss Prevention (DLP) and DAR scanning. It helps to protect sensitive data on endpoints, ensuring compliance and preventing data leakage. The product's capabilities in these areas benefit me by providing greater control and security over my data assets.
I appreciate the level of support I have received while using Digital Guardian (DG). The support team has been helpful and responsive, enhancing my experience with the product.
One drawback is the lack of management of DAR (Data at Rest) scanners within the DG Management Console (DGMC). This limitation can be inconvenient when it comes to managing and configuring the scanners.
Malware bytes is a great tool to protect your computer and other devices from malicious malware and viruses. Buying the paid version is recommended as it adds an entirely new layer of protection from PUP/PUM files.
I don’t have any issue or problem with this program.
Digital Guardian addresses issues related to agent communication and provides data loss prevention and enhanced security measures. The DLP process effectively blocks the unauthorized transfer of confidential data, ensuring data protection and reducing the risk of data breaches.
I appreciate that Digital Guardian's Data Loss Prevention (DLP) tool plays a vital role in secure data transmission. It effectively assigns policies to individual users, ensuring data protection.
There is room for improvement in the Helpdesk Support regarding technical aspects. Customized policies for groups of applications or people are currently unavailable. The console's GUI could be more user-friendly.
It is the best option for protecting all your computer systems from all kinds of threats and malware.
It has the capability to save multiple computers at different times. Protection is promised when you use Malwarebytes.
The dashboard seems a bit clunky. But once learned, it is a breeze.
DG primarily addresses endpoint Data Loss Prevention (DLP) and DAR scanning. It helps to protect sensitive data on endpoints, ensuring compliance and preventing data leakage. The product's capabilities in these areas benefit me by providing greater control and security over my data assets.
I appreciate the level of support I have received while using Digital Guardian (DG). The support team has been helpful and responsive, enhancing my experience with the product.
One drawback is the lack of management of DAR (Data at Rest) scanners within the DG Management Console (DGMC). This limitation can be inconvenient when it comes to managing and configuring the scanners.
Digital Guardian addresses issues related to agent communication and provides data loss prevention and enhanced security measures. The DLP process effectively blocks the unauthorized transfer of confidential data, ensuring data protection and reducing the risk of data breaches.
I appreciate that Digital Guardian's Data Loss Prevention (DLP) tool plays a vital role in secure data transmission. It effectively assigns policies to individual users, ensuring data protection.
There is room for improvement in the Helpdesk Support regarding technical aspects. Customized policies for groups of applications or people are currently unavailable. The console's GUI could be more user-friendly.
Malware bytes is a great tool to protect your computer and other devices from malicious malware and viruses. Buying the paid version is recommended as it adds an entirely new layer of protection from PUP/PUM files.
I don’t have any issue or problem with this program.
It is the best option for protecting all your computer systems from all kinds of threats and malware.
It has the capability to save multiple computers at different times. Protection is promised when you use Malwarebytes.
The dashboard seems a bit clunky. But once learned, it is a breeze.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Digital Guardian vs. ThreatDown, ThreatDown has 122 user reviews and Digital Guardian has 16. The average star rating for ThreatDown is 4.69 while Digital Guardian has an average rating of 4.43. ThreatDown has more positive reviews than Digital Guardian. Comparing Digital Guardian vs. ThreatDown reviews, ThreatDown has stronger overall reviews.
Digital Guardian vs. ThreatDown both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Reporting & Analytics, Device Management, Network Management, Application Management, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Password Management, Disaster Recovery, Reminders/Alerts, Workflow Automation, Systems/Administrative, Sync/Refresh, Third-Party Integrations, Compliance Accreditations, Supported Technologies, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of Digital Guardian vs. ThreatDown, ThreatDown offers more of the most popular features and tools than Digital Guardian.
In our pricing comparison of Digital Guardian vs. ThreatDown, ThreatDown's pricing starts at $69/month and is more affordable compared to ThreatDown's starting cost of $69/month.
Our comparison of Digital Guardian vs. ThreatDown shows that ThreatDown scores higher in usability for ease of use, setup & support, ease of admin. Digital Guardian scores higher in meets requirements, learning curve, quality of support, but ThreatDown has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
