In our comparison of Digital Guardian vs. Thales, Thales is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
DG primarily addresses endpoint Data Loss Prevention (DLP) and DAR scanning. It helps to protect sensitive data on endpoints, ensuring compliance and preventing data leakage. The product's capabilities in these areas benefit me by providing greater control and security over my data assets.
I appreciate the level of support I have received while using Digital Guardian (DG). The support team has been helpful and responsive, enhancing my experience with the product.
One drawback is the lack of management of DAR (Data at Rest) scanners within the DG Management Console (DGMC). This limitation can be inconvenient when it comes to managing and configuring the scanners.
The Thales CipherTrust Data Security Platform solves a range of problems and offers significant benefits to users. It ensures compliance with regulations and standards, enabling organizations to meet their compliance obligations effectively. Additionally, the platform facilitates data discovery and classification, assisting in identifying and categorizing sensitive information accurately. Furthermore, it enables monitoring, detection, control, and reporting of data access, enhancing overall data security practices. Finally, the platform's tokenization feature plays a crucial role in data protection, adding an extra layer of security to sensitive information.
There are areas that could benefit from improvement. Specifically, centralized data management could be enhanced to streamline processes and enhance overall efficiency. Furthermore, the reporting functionality could be improved to provide more comprehensive and detailed insights into data security.
Digital Guardian addresses issues related to agent communication and provides data loss prevention and enhanced security measures. The DLP process effectively blocks the unauthorized transfer of confidential data, ensuring data protection and reducing the risk of data breaches.
I appreciate that Digital Guardian's Data Loss Prevention (DLP) tool plays a vital role in secure data transmission. It effectively assigns policies to individual users, ensuring data protection.
There is room for improvement in the Helpdesk Support regarding technical aspects. Customized policies for groups of applications or people are currently unavailable. The console's GUI could be more user-friendly.
CipherTrust Data Security Platform effectively solves the problems related to data security operations such as protection, discovery, and control. This greatly benefits me by providing the necessary tools and measures to safeguard my data.
What I like best about Thales CipherTrust Data Security Platform is how it simplifies data security, reducing compliance time and ensuring the protection of data during cloud migration. Thales delivers more than I could expect.
I find that the platform's numerous features and control options make it slightly cumbersome to operate. However, I understand that this is a result of the demanding industry, so I can't really complain.
DG primarily addresses endpoint Data Loss Prevention (DLP) and DAR scanning. It helps to protect sensitive data on endpoints, ensuring compliance and preventing data leakage. The product's capabilities in these areas benefit me by providing greater control and security over my data assets.
I appreciate the level of support I have received while using Digital Guardian (DG). The support team has been helpful and responsive, enhancing my experience with the product.
One drawback is the lack of management of DAR (Data at Rest) scanners within the DG Management Console (DGMC). This limitation can be inconvenient when it comes to managing and configuring the scanners.
Digital Guardian addresses issues related to agent communication and provides data loss prevention and enhanced security measures. The DLP process effectively blocks the unauthorized transfer of confidential data, ensuring data protection and reducing the risk of data breaches.
I appreciate that Digital Guardian's Data Loss Prevention (DLP) tool plays a vital role in secure data transmission. It effectively assigns policies to individual users, ensuring data protection.
There is room for improvement in the Helpdesk Support regarding technical aspects. Customized policies for groups of applications or people are currently unavailable. The console's GUI could be more user-friendly.
The Thales CipherTrust Data Security Platform solves a range of problems and offers significant benefits to users. It ensures compliance with regulations and standards, enabling organizations to meet their compliance obligations effectively. Additionally, the platform facilitates data discovery and classification, assisting in identifying and categorizing sensitive information accurately. Furthermore, it enables monitoring, detection, control, and reporting of data access, enhancing overall data security practices. Finally, the platform's tokenization feature plays a crucial role in data protection, adding an extra layer of security to sensitive information.
There are areas that could benefit from improvement. Specifically, centralized data management could be enhanced to streamline processes and enhance overall efficiency. Furthermore, the reporting functionality could be improved to provide more comprehensive and detailed insights into data security.
CipherTrust Data Security Platform effectively solves the problems related to data security operations such as protection, discovery, and control. This greatly benefits me by providing the necessary tools and measures to safeguard my data.
What I like best about Thales CipherTrust Data Security Platform is how it simplifies data security, reducing compliance time and ensuring the protection of data during cloud migration. Thales delivers more than I could expect.
I find that the platform's numerous features and control options make it slightly cumbersome to operate. However, I understand that this is a result of the demanding industry, so I can't really complain.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Digital Guardian vs. Thales, Digital Guardian has 16 user reviews and Thales has 3. The average star rating for Digital Guardian is 4.43 while Thales has an average rating of 4.33. Digital Guardian has more positive reviews than Thales. Comparing Digital Guardian vs. Thales reviews, Digital Guardian has stronger overall reviews.
Digital Guardian vs. Thales both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Reporting & Analytics, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Password Management, Disaster Recovery, Data Management, Systems/Administrative, Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC) Integrations, Third-Party Integrations, Compliance Accreditations, File Management. In our feature comparison of Digital Guardian vs. Thales, Thales offers more of the most popular features and tools than Digital Guardian.
In our pricing comparison of Digital Guardian vs. Thales, Thales's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to Thales's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of Digital Guardian vs. Thales shows that Thales scores higher in usability for meets requirements, ease of admin. Digital Guardian scores higher in ease of use, learning curve, quality of support, but Thales has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
