In our comparison of Digital Guardian vs. Proofpoint, Proofpoint is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
DG primarily addresses endpoint Data Loss Prevention (DLP) and DAR scanning. It helps to protect sensitive data on endpoints, ensuring compliance and preventing data leakage. The product's capabilities in these areas benefit me by providing greater control and security over my data assets.
I appreciate the level of support I have received while using Digital Guardian (DG). The support team has been helpful and responsive, enhancing my experience with the product.
One drawback is the lack of management of DAR (Data at Rest) scanners within the DG Management Console (DGMC). This limitation can be inconvenient when it comes to managing and configuring the scanners.
Stopping spam and malicious emails, but requires continual training and user management. Wanted to use SPF, DKIM, and DMARC features but couldn't get help from support.
The system works well with regular training and use of quarantine and daily digest for suspect emails.
Lack of initial and ongoing training, difficult sales rep, and poor support after the person managing the system left.
Digital Guardian addresses issues related to agent communication and provides data loss prevention and enhanced security measures. The DLP process effectively blocks the unauthorized transfer of confidential data, ensuring data protection and reducing the risk of data breaches.
I appreciate that Digital Guardian's Data Loss Prevention (DLP) tool plays a vital role in secure data transmission. It effectively assigns policies to individual users, ensuring data protection.
There is room for improvement in the Helpdesk Support regarding technical aspects. Customized policies for groups of applications or people are currently unavailable. The console's GUI could be more user-friendly.
It's a reliable product that delivers on its promises.
Great coverage against phishing, malware, impersonation, and business exploits
The documentation for Google Workspace is notably deficient. This led to complications during our go-live phase due to conflicting information. Additionally, it took 45 minutes to connect with a resource through P1 support.
DG primarily addresses endpoint Data Loss Prevention (DLP) and DAR scanning. It helps to protect sensitive data on endpoints, ensuring compliance and preventing data leakage. The product's capabilities in these areas benefit me by providing greater control and security over my data assets.
I appreciate the level of support I have received while using Digital Guardian (DG). The support team has been helpful and responsive, enhancing my experience with the product.
One drawback is the lack of management of DAR (Data at Rest) scanners within the DG Management Console (DGMC). This limitation can be inconvenient when it comes to managing and configuring the scanners.
Digital Guardian addresses issues related to agent communication and provides data loss prevention and enhanced security measures. The DLP process effectively blocks the unauthorized transfer of confidential data, ensuring data protection and reducing the risk of data breaches.
I appreciate that Digital Guardian's Data Loss Prevention (DLP) tool plays a vital role in secure data transmission. It effectively assigns policies to individual users, ensuring data protection.
There is room for improvement in the Helpdesk Support regarding technical aspects. Customized policies for groups of applications or people are currently unavailable. The console's GUI could be more user-friendly.
Stopping spam and malicious emails, but requires continual training and user management. Wanted to use SPF, DKIM, and DMARC features but couldn't get help from support.
The system works well with regular training and use of quarantine and daily digest for suspect emails.
Lack of initial and ongoing training, difficult sales rep, and poor support after the person managing the system left.
It's a reliable product that delivers on its promises.
Great coverage against phishing, malware, impersonation, and business exploits
The documentation for Google Workspace is notably deficient. This led to complications during our go-live phase due to conflicting information. Additionally, it took 45 minutes to connect with a resource through P1 support.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Digital Guardian vs. Proofpoint, Proofpoint has 15 user reviews and Digital Guardian has 16. The average star rating for Proofpoint is 4.66 while Digital Guardian has an average rating of 4.43. Proofpoint has more positive reviews than Digital Guardian. Comparing Digital Guardian vs. Proofpoint reviews, Proofpoint has stronger overall reviews.
Digital Guardian vs. Proofpoint both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Reporting & Analytics, Cloud Management, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Device Management, Systems/Administrative, Configuration Management, Application Management, Supported Technologies, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of Digital Guardian vs. Proofpoint, Proofpoint offers more of the most popular features and tools than Digital Guardian.
In our pricing comparison of Digital Guardian vs. Proofpoint, Proofpoint's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to Proofpoint's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of Digital Guardian vs. Proofpoint shows that Proofpoint scores higher in usability for ease of use, learning curve, setup & support, ease of admin. Digital Guardian scores higher in meets requirements, quality of support, but Proofpoint has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
