In our comparison of Digital Guardian vs. Perimeter 81, Perimeter 81 is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
DG primarily addresses endpoint Data Loss Prevention (DLP) and DAR scanning. It helps to protect sensitive data on endpoints, ensuring compliance and preventing data leakage. The product's capabilities in these areas benefit me by providing greater control and security over my data assets.
I appreciate the level of support I have received while using Digital Guardian (DG). The support team has been helpful and responsive, enhancing my experience with the product.
One drawback is the lack of management of DAR (Data at Rest) scanners within the DG Management Console (DGMC). This limitation can be inconvenient when it comes to managing and configuring the scanners.
Perimeter 81 assists me in safeguarding the personal and sensitive information of my customers. As someone who deals with such data, this product helps me ensure its security and protection.
The best aspect of Perimeter 81, as experienced by my company, is its flawless performance and speed. So far, I haven't encountered any issues, and everything has been working efficiently. I have no negative feedback to share.
There are no complaints or dislikes to mention at this time. Everything has been functioning well.
Digital Guardian addresses issues related to agent communication and provides data loss prevention and enhanced security measures. The DLP process effectively blocks the unauthorized transfer of confidential data, ensuring data protection and reducing the risk of data breaches.
I appreciate that Digital Guardian's Data Loss Prevention (DLP) tool plays a vital role in secure data transmission. It effectively assigns policies to individual users, ensuring data protection.
There is room for improvement in the Helpdesk Support regarding technical aspects. Customized policies for groups of applications or people are currently unavailable. The console's GUI could be more user-friendly.
The product solves the problem of remote access by providing a SaaS solution with dedicated access points and IP address allocations. This greatly benefits our organization by ensuring secure and reliable remote access for our team members.
One of the standout features is how quickly and seamlessly we were able to replace our remote access solution during our SOC2 Type II process. Within just 15 minutes, we connected our G-Suite for SSO, implemented access restrictions for our GCP instances, configured IP whitelisting for our main SaaS services, and invited our entire team. The user-friendly native agent has made it easy for both technical and non-technical teams to use without any issues. Additionally, having access points in the specific geo-locations we needed (Israel, EMEA, and US) has greatly improved performance.
There isn't much to dislike, especially after exploring other solutions. However, it would be nice to have additional dashboards, bandwidth tracking, and more granular traffic control within the Perimeter 81 network as our company grows.
DG primarily addresses endpoint Data Loss Prevention (DLP) and DAR scanning. It helps to protect sensitive data on endpoints, ensuring compliance and preventing data leakage. The product's capabilities in these areas benefit me by providing greater control and security over my data assets.
I appreciate the level of support I have received while using Digital Guardian (DG). The support team has been helpful and responsive, enhancing my experience with the product.
One drawback is the lack of management of DAR (Data at Rest) scanners within the DG Management Console (DGMC). This limitation can be inconvenient when it comes to managing and configuring the scanners.
Digital Guardian addresses issues related to agent communication and provides data loss prevention and enhanced security measures. The DLP process effectively blocks the unauthorized transfer of confidential data, ensuring data protection and reducing the risk of data breaches.
I appreciate that Digital Guardian's Data Loss Prevention (DLP) tool plays a vital role in secure data transmission. It effectively assigns policies to individual users, ensuring data protection.
There is room for improvement in the Helpdesk Support regarding technical aspects. Customized policies for groups of applications or people are currently unavailable. The console's GUI could be more user-friendly.
Perimeter 81 assists me in safeguarding the personal and sensitive information of my customers. As someone who deals with such data, this product helps me ensure its security and protection.
The best aspect of Perimeter 81, as experienced by my company, is its flawless performance and speed. So far, I haven't encountered any issues, and everything has been working efficiently. I have no negative feedback to share.
There are no complaints or dislikes to mention at this time. Everything has been functioning well.
The product solves the problem of remote access by providing a SaaS solution with dedicated access points and IP address allocations. This greatly benefits our organization by ensuring secure and reliable remote access for our team members.
One of the standout features is how quickly and seamlessly we were able to replace our remote access solution during our SOC2 Type II process. Within just 15 minutes, we connected our G-Suite for SSO, implemented access restrictions for our GCP instances, configured IP whitelisting for our main SaaS services, and invited our entire team. The user-friendly native agent has made it easy for both technical and non-technical teams to use without any issues. Additionally, having access points in the specific geo-locations we needed (Israel, EMEA, and US) has greatly improved performance.
There isn't much to dislike, especially after exploring other solutions. However, it would be nice to have additional dashboards, bandwidth tracking, and more granular traffic control within the Perimeter 81 network as our company grows.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Digital Guardian vs. Perimeter 81, Perimeter 81 has 15 user reviews and Digital Guardian has 16. The average star rating for Perimeter 81 is 4.8 while Digital Guardian has an average rating of 4.43. Perimeter 81 has more positive reviews than Digital Guardian. Comparing Digital Guardian vs. Perimeter 81 reviews, Perimeter 81 has stronger overall reviews.
Digital Guardian vs. Perimeter 81 both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Reporting & Analytics, Governance, Risk, & Compliance (GRC), Identity and Access Management (IAM), Network Management, Device Management, Sync/Refresh, Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC) Integrations, After-Sales Service, Limits. In our feature comparison of Digital Guardian vs. Perimeter 81, Perimeter 81 offers more of the most popular features and tools than Digital Guardian.
In our pricing comparison of Digital Guardian vs. Perimeter 81, Perimeter 81's pricing starts at $8/month and is more affordable compared to Perimeter 81's starting cost of $8/month.
Our comparison of Digital Guardian vs. Perimeter 81 shows that Perimeter 81 scores higher in usability for setup & support, quality of support. Digital Guardian scores higher in ease of use, meets requirements, learning curve, ease of admin, but Perimeter 81 has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
