In our comparison of Coro vs. SecurityScorecard, SecurityScorecard is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
Coro initially appeared to be the ideal option because of how simple it was to set up and use the management interface. But I soon found that its seeming simplicity belied a startling depth and intricacy. My issues were eventually resolved by the multi-layered strategy, although there was a higher learning curve than I had imagined.
Simple to setup, easy to use
None
Companies can access real-time security scores from Security Scorecard, which is routinely updated to reflect changes to their networks and apps. Customers that wish to initiate discussions about their security posture and buy additional services will find this useful. However, for new businesses, the first discovery phase can last up to 7 days, so a 24-hour-earlier report would be advantageous.
Real-time scoring from multiple sources and score is updated over time to track changes in security posture
Initial discovery can take up to 7 days for new companies, and 24-hour earlier reports would be a useful feature
Coro is an excellent way to shield employees from phishing and other dangers as well as stop sensitive data from being shared or leaked without authorization. It offers visibility over what sensitive data is shared or departing the company and by whom, and it is simple to set up and operate. Nevertheless, there were some difficulties when using group policy to deploy the agent.
Easy to setup and use, intutive and visibility
Deploying agent through group policy was trouble
Clear and concise security metrics are provided by this software, making it simple for senior management to understand and implement low-hanging security adjustments. Despite the possibility of some false positives as a result of shared cloud resources, the product offers a quick and efficient way to identify security issues and spur change.
Easy to understand, and allows you to push for security changes
False positives
Coro initially appeared to be the ideal option because of how simple it was to set up and use the management interface. But I soon found that its seeming simplicity belied a startling depth and intricacy. My issues were eventually resolved by the multi-layered strategy, although there was a higher learning curve than I had imagined.
Simple to setup, easy to use
None
Coro is an excellent way to shield employees from phishing and other dangers as well as stop sensitive data from being shared or leaked without authorization. It offers visibility over what sensitive data is shared or departing the company and by whom, and it is simple to set up and operate. Nevertheless, there were some difficulties when using group policy to deploy the agent.
Easy to setup and use, intutive and visibility
Deploying agent through group policy was trouble
Companies can access real-time security scores from Security Scorecard, which is routinely updated to reflect changes to their networks and apps. Customers that wish to initiate discussions about their security posture and buy additional services will find this useful. However, for new businesses, the first discovery phase can last up to 7 days, so a 24-hour-earlier report would be advantageous.
Real-time scoring from multiple sources and score is updated over time to track changes in security posture
Initial discovery can take up to 7 days for new companies, and 24-hour earlier reports would be a useful feature
Clear and concise security metrics are provided by this software, making it simple for senior management to understand and implement low-hanging security adjustments. Despite the possibility of some false positives as a result of shared cloud resources, the product offers a quick and efficient way to identify security issues and spur change.
Easy to understand, and allows you to push for security changes
False positives
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Coro vs. SecurityScorecard, Coro has 21 user reviews and SecurityScorecard has 18. The average star rating for Coro is 4.66 while SecurityScorecard has an average rating of 4.05. Coro has more positive reviews than SecurityScorecard. Comparing Coro vs. SecurityScorecard reviews, Coro has stronger overall reviews.
Coro vs. SecurityScorecard both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Reporting & Analytics, Governance, Risk, & Compliance (GRC), Identity and Access Management (IAM), Cloud Management, Reminders/Alerts, Systems/Administrative, Customizable Items, Integration Options, Language & Speech, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of Coro vs. SecurityScorecard, SecurityScorecard offers more of the most popular features and tools than Coro.
In our pricing comparison of Coro vs. SecurityScorecard, SecurityScorecard's pricing starts at Free/month and is more affordable compared to SecurityScorecard's starting cost of Free/month.
Our comparison of Coro vs. SecurityScorecard shows that SecurityScorecard scores higher in usability for ease of use, learning curve, setup & support, quality of support, ease of admin. Coro scores higher in meets requirements, but SecurityScorecard has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
