In our comparison of Concrete5 vs. DocuShare, DocuShare is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
Concrete5 is a powerful yet user-friendly CMS that offers dynamic solutions for various projects. Its cost-efficient marketplace, robust e-commerce features, and quick deployment capabilities make it valuable for web development needs. While a learning curve exists, the platform's benefits far outweigh occasional challenges.
For those requiring multi-language displays, Concrete5 seamlessly handles internationalization, catering to a global audience. Sites can be swiftly deployed with minimal costs, and end-users often require only minutes, not hours or days, for training. The platform's user-friendly nature contributes to swift adoption.
The technology underpinning Concrete5 has evolved over the years, introducing increased complexity. However, this doesn't impede less technical users from utilizing the platform effectively.
Using it is fantastic, helpful for maintaining vital documents for any company after uploading them, it is a great effort and time saver system, the use and functionality are exceptional, and documents can be accessed promptly by any of our team members.
A high price for small companies
This is a powerful system for web developers for developing a content management system without building a solution from the start or tricking a blog into a website.
Installation and having the system functioning takes some time.
DocuShare proves to be incredibly beneficial for my team and business. Its collaborative features enable smooth cooperation among users in terms of documents, files, and images for publication on the community. The platform not only simplifies document management, saving time, but, most importantly, it enhances communication and management within the workplace.**
The platform facilitates seamless sharing of files, capturing images, and posting them on the internet, enabling effective collaboration within my team and among individuals with shared goals.
The only drawback is related to the "Upgrade Wizard," which requires registered users to be notified when the site is inactive.
Concrete5 is a powerful yet user-friendly CMS that offers dynamic solutions for various projects. Its cost-efficient marketplace, robust e-commerce features, and quick deployment capabilities make it valuable for web development needs. While a learning curve exists, the platform's benefits far outweigh occasional challenges.
For those requiring multi-language displays, Concrete5 seamlessly handles internationalization, catering to a global audience. Sites can be swiftly deployed with minimal costs, and end-users often require only minutes, not hours or days, for training. The platform's user-friendly nature contributes to swift adoption.
The technology underpinning Concrete5 has evolved over the years, introducing increased complexity. However, this doesn't impede less technical users from utilizing the platform effectively.
This is a powerful system for web developers for developing a content management system without building a solution from the start or tricking a blog into a website.
Installation and having the system functioning takes some time.
Using it is fantastic, helpful for maintaining vital documents for any company after uploading them, it is a great effort and time saver system, the use and functionality are exceptional, and documents can be accessed promptly by any of our team members.
A high price for small companies
DocuShare proves to be incredibly beneficial for my team and business. Its collaborative features enable smooth cooperation among users in terms of documents, files, and images for publication on the community. The platform not only simplifies document management, saving time, but, most importantly, it enhances communication and management within the workplace.**
The platform facilitates seamless sharing of files, capturing images, and posting them on the internet, enabling effective collaboration within my team and among individuals with shared goals.
The only drawback is related to the "Upgrade Wizard," which requires registered users to be notified when the site is inactive.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Concrete5 vs. DocuShare, Concrete5 has 14 user reviews and DocuShare has 15. The average star rating for Concrete5 is 4.64 while DocuShare has an average rating of 4.2. Concrete5 has more positive reviews than DocuShare. Comparing Concrete5 vs. DocuShare reviews, Concrete5 has stronger overall reviews.
Concrete5 vs. DocuShare both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Content Management System (CMS) Features, File Management, Supported File Formats, Signature Management, Data Management, Supported Content Types, Search Tools, Collaboration Tools, Customizable Items, Reporting & Analytics, Systems/Administrative, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Cybersecurity Features, Supported Technologies. In our feature comparison of Concrete5 vs. DocuShare, DocuShare offers more of the most popular features and tools than Concrete5.
In our pricing comparison of Concrete5 vs. DocuShare, DocuShare's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to DocuShare's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of Concrete5 vs. DocuShare shows that DocuShare scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, setup & support, ease of admin. Concrete5 scores higher in learning curve, quality of support, but DocuShare has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
