In our comparison of Cloudera vs. ThreatConnect, ThreatConnect is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
Regarding large-scale Hadoop and big data projects, Cloudera is the best. Their system is amazing; they have great support that sincerely wants you to succeed. Their cloud game, though, needs improvement. SaaS offerings should be expanded, especially on AWS and Azure, to further establish their supremacy. Portability is a significant disadvantage; it is difficult to switch platforms later on.
Helpful and supportive team
Limited SaaS offerings
For a small team, ThreatConnect proved effective in scaling and managing enterprise threat intelligence and threat hunting capabilities. However, as the complexity of Playbook design and integration increased, the software's potential was hindered, preventing the team from fully maximizing its benefits.
ThreatConnect offered the ability to gather, analyze, enhance, and distribute various types of data related to cybersecurity incidents and indicators of compromise across different customer environments. It allowed for tasks such as uploading a domain name, checking it against threat feeds, and enriching the data with additional information like news articles, reports, attribution, and determining the domain's prevalence across multiple client setups.
One of the drawbacks we encountered was the confusion and lack of proper documentation regarding the Playbooks that facilitated enrichment and integration with third-party tools like SIEM. The visual representation of coding concepts, where blocks were connected to one another, was intended to assist non-programmers in developing their capabilities. In reality, a more code-centric approach to Playbook development would have been more beneficial. We found ourselves with numerous questions and minimal guidance on how to address simple problems that could be easily tackled using Python.
Regarding large-scale Hadoop and big data projects, Cloudera is the best. Their system is amazing; they have great support that sincerely wants you to succeed. Their cloud game, though, needs improvement. SaaS offerings should be expanded, especially on AWS and Azure, to further establish their supremacy. Portability is a significant disadvantage; it is difficult to switch platforms later on.
Helpful and supportive team
Limited SaaS offerings
Consider this risk management system that offers numerous possibilities for effortless detection of high-risk threats and a platform for record-keeping.
It is convenient for any company to efficiently prioritize potential high-risk issues. Additionally, it simplifies record maintenance, and ThreatConnect facilitates easy threat detection through actionable analysis.
There were no significant issues encountered during the implementation of ThreatConnect, and it even facilitated learning about the tools.
Regarding large-scale Hadoop and big data projects, Cloudera is the best. Their system is amazing; they have great support that sincerely wants you to succeed. Their cloud game, though, needs improvement. SaaS offerings should be expanded, especially on AWS and Azure, to further establish their supremacy. Portability is a significant disadvantage; it is difficult to switch platforms later on.
Helpful and supportive team
Limited SaaS offerings
Regarding large-scale Hadoop and big data projects, Cloudera is the best. Their system is amazing; they have great support that sincerely wants you to succeed. Their cloud game, though, needs improvement. SaaS offerings should be expanded, especially on AWS and Azure, to further establish their supremacy. Portability is a significant disadvantage; it is difficult to switch platforms later on.
Helpful and supportive team
Limited SaaS offerings
For a small team, ThreatConnect proved effective in scaling and managing enterprise threat intelligence and threat hunting capabilities. However, as the complexity of Playbook design and integration increased, the software's potential was hindered, preventing the team from fully maximizing its benefits.
ThreatConnect offered the ability to gather, analyze, enhance, and distribute various types of data related to cybersecurity incidents and indicators of compromise across different customer environments. It allowed for tasks such as uploading a domain name, checking it against threat feeds, and enriching the data with additional information like news articles, reports, attribution, and determining the domain's prevalence across multiple client setups.
One of the drawbacks we encountered was the confusion and lack of proper documentation regarding the Playbooks that facilitated enrichment and integration with third-party tools like SIEM. The visual representation of coding concepts, where blocks were connected to one another, was intended to assist non-programmers in developing their capabilities. In reality, a more code-centric approach to Playbook development would have been more beneficial. We found ourselves with numerous questions and minimal guidance on how to address simple problems that could be easily tackled using Python.
Consider this risk management system that offers numerous possibilities for effortless detection of high-risk threats and a platform for record-keeping.
It is convenient for any company to efficiently prioritize potential high-risk issues. Additionally, it simplifies record maintenance, and ThreatConnect facilitates easy threat detection through actionable analysis.
There were no significant issues encountered during the implementation of ThreatConnect, and it even facilitated learning about the tools.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Cloudera vs. ThreatConnect, Cloudera has 12 user reviews and ThreatConnect has 2. The average star rating for Cloudera is 4.08 while ThreatConnect has an average rating of 3.5. Cloudera has more positive reviews than ThreatConnect. Comparing Cloudera vs. ThreatConnect reviews, Cloudera has stronger overall reviews.
Cloudera vs. ThreatConnect both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Reporting & Analytics, Workflow Automation, Drag-and-Drop Builders/Designers, Collaboration Tools, Reminders/Alerts, Report Management, Systems/Administrative, Customizable Items, Integration Options, Compliance Accreditations, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of Cloudera vs. ThreatConnect, ThreatConnect offers more of the most popular features and tools than Cloudera.
In our pricing comparison of Cloudera vs. ThreatConnect, ThreatConnect's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to ThreatConnect's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of Cloudera vs. ThreatConnect shows that ThreatConnect scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, ease of admin. Cloudera scores higher in learning curve, but ThreatConnect has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
