In our comparison of Cisco Secure vs. Proofpoint, Proofpoint is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
The provider, Cisco, solves the problem of ensuring high flexibility, scalability, and robust security during the cloud migration process. Their services deliver numerous benefits, including seamless migration without downtime, enhanced security measures, and reliable support. The team's guidance and support contribute to a successful and secure migration experience.
I appreciate the end-to-end security solutions provided by Cisco, along with the support they offer to the existing infrastructure. The professional team demonstrated their expertise and provided robust support throughout the migration process. They addressed all queries promptly with minimal turnaround time.
It appears that there is nothing to dislike about the provider's services. The integration with the existing system was smooth, and all the anticipated benefits were realized even after full production. As of now, there are no dislikes.
Stopping spam and malicious emails, but requires continual training and user management. Wanted to use SPF, DKIM, and DMARC features but couldn't get help from support.
The system works well with regular training and use of quarantine and daily digest for suspect emails.
Lack of initial and ongoing training, difficult sales rep, and poor support after the person managing the system left.
The provider, Cisco, solves the problem of ensuring high flexibility, scalability, and robust security during the cloud migration process. Their services deliver numerous benefits, including seamless migration without downtime, enhanced security measures, and reliable support. The team's guidance and support contribute to a successful and secure migration experience.
I appreciate the end-to-end security solutions provided by Cisco, along with the support they offer to the existing infrastructure. The professional team demonstrated their expertise and provided robust support throughout the migration process. They addressed all queries promptly with minimal turnaround time.
It appears that there is nothing to dislike about the provider's services. The integration with the existing system was smooth, and all the anticipated benefits were realized even after full production. As of now, there are no dislikes.
It's a reliable product that delivers on its promises.
Great coverage against phishing, malware, impersonation, and business exploits
The documentation for Google Workspace is notably deficient. This led to complications during our go-live phase due to conflicting information. Additionally, it took 45 minutes to connect with a resource through P1 support.
The provider, Cisco, solves the problem of ensuring high flexibility, scalability, and robust security during the cloud migration process. Their services deliver numerous benefits, including seamless migration without downtime, enhanced security measures, and reliable support. The team's guidance and support contribute to a successful and secure migration experience.
I appreciate the end-to-end security solutions provided by Cisco, along with the support they offer to the existing infrastructure. The professional team demonstrated their expertise and provided robust support throughout the migration process. They addressed all queries promptly with minimal turnaround time.
It appears that there is nothing to dislike about the provider's services. The integration with the existing system was smooth, and all the anticipated benefits were realized even after full production. As of now, there are no dislikes.
The provider, Cisco, solves the problem of ensuring high flexibility, scalability, and robust security during the cloud migration process. Their services deliver numerous benefits, including seamless migration without downtime, enhanced security measures, and reliable support. The team's guidance and support contribute to a successful and secure migration experience.
I appreciate the end-to-end security solutions provided by Cisco, along with the support they offer to the existing infrastructure. The professional team demonstrated their expertise and provided robust support throughout the migration process. They addressed all queries promptly with minimal turnaround time.
It appears that there is nothing to dislike about the provider's services. The integration with the existing system was smooth, and all the anticipated benefits were realized even after full production. As of now, there are no dislikes.
Stopping spam and malicious emails, but requires continual training and user management. Wanted to use SPF, DKIM, and DMARC features but couldn't get help from support.
The system works well with regular training and use of quarantine and daily digest for suspect emails.
Lack of initial and ongoing training, difficult sales rep, and poor support after the person managing the system left.
It's a reliable product that delivers on its promises.
Great coverage against phishing, malware, impersonation, and business exploits
The documentation for Google Workspace is notably deficient. This led to complications during our go-live phase due to conflicting information. Additionally, it took 45 minutes to connect with a resource through P1 support.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Cisco Secure vs. Proofpoint, Cisco Secure has 16 user reviews and Proofpoint has 15. The average star rating for Cisco Secure is 4.75 while Proofpoint has an average rating of 4.66. Cisco Secure has more positive reviews than Proofpoint. Comparing Cisco Secure vs. Proofpoint reviews, Cisco Secure has stronger overall reviews.
Cisco Secure vs. Proofpoint both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Reporting & Analytics, Cloud Management, Device Management, Application Management, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Systems/Administrative, Configuration Management, Supported Technologies, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of Cisco Secure vs. Proofpoint, Proofpoint offers more of the most popular features and tools than Cisco Secure.
In our pricing comparison of Cisco Secure vs. Proofpoint, Proofpoint's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to Proofpoint's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of Cisco Secure vs. Proofpoint shows that Proofpoint scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, learning curve, setup & support, ease of admin. Cisco Secure scores higher in , but Proofpoint has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.