In our comparison of Check Point Next Generation Firewalls (NGFW) vs. SecurityScorecard, SecurityScorecard is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
N/A
Check Point excels with its quick setup, easy management tools, and lightning-fast performance. Additionally, the reports are simple. It's amazing how much their new Maestro technology pushes hardware efficiency. The expensive price is my sole complaint. However, Check Point is hard to surpass for seamless scalability and rock-solid stability.
Ease of deployment, friendly management and reporting GUI
High price
Companies can access real-time security scores from Security Scorecard, which is routinely updated to reflect changes to their networks and apps. Customers that wish to initiate discussions about their security posture and buy additional services will find this useful. However, for new businesses, the first discovery phase can last up to 7 days, so a 24-hour-earlier report would be advantageous.
Real-time scoring from multiple sources and score is updated over time to track changes in security posture
Initial discovery can take up to 7 days for new companies, and 24-hour earlier reports would be a useful feature
I was quite satisfied with Checkpoint's firewall because of its very simple setup wizard and informative security reports. Although these functions are standard, Checkpoint performs them incredibly effectively. Administrators are provided with a comprehensive overview of their network's security by the straightforward and comprehensive reports. However, there is room for improvement in the log storage capacity, particularly for SMB clients who want all-in-one solutions. More internal storage may be desired by some users, even though integration with external log servers is a benefit.
Simple Installation, centralized security
Limited Log Holding Capacity
Clear and concise security metrics are provided by this software, making it simple for senior management to understand and implement low-hanging security adjustments. Despite the possibility of some false positives as a result of shared cloud resources, the product offers a quick and efficient way to identify security issues and spur change.
Easy to understand, and allows you to push for security changes
False positives
Check Point excels with its quick setup, easy management tools, and lightning-fast performance. Additionally, the reports are simple. It's amazing how much their new Maestro technology pushes hardware efficiency. The expensive price is my sole complaint. However, Check Point is hard to surpass for seamless scalability and rock-solid stability.
Ease of deployment, friendly management and reporting GUI
High price
I was quite satisfied with Checkpoint's firewall because of its very simple setup wizard and informative security reports. Although these functions are standard, Checkpoint performs them incredibly effectively. Administrators are provided with a comprehensive overview of their network's security by the straightforward and comprehensive reports. However, there is room for improvement in the log storage capacity, particularly for SMB clients who want all-in-one solutions. More internal storage may be desired by some users, even though integration with external log servers is a benefit.
Simple Installation, centralized security
Limited Log Holding Capacity
Companies can access real-time security scores from Security Scorecard, which is routinely updated to reflect changes to their networks and apps. Customers that wish to initiate discussions about their security posture and buy additional services will find this useful. However, for new businesses, the first discovery phase can last up to 7 days, so a 24-hour-earlier report would be advantageous.
Real-time scoring from multiple sources and score is updated over time to track changes in security posture
Initial discovery can take up to 7 days for new companies, and 24-hour earlier reports would be a useful feature
Clear and concise security metrics are provided by this software, making it simple for senior management to understand and implement low-hanging security adjustments. Despite the possibility of some false positives as a result of shared cloud resources, the product offers a quick and efficient way to identify security issues and spur change.
Easy to understand, and allows you to push for security changes
False positives
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Check Point Next Generation Firewalls (NGFW) vs. SecurityScorecard, Check Point Next Generation Firewalls (NGFW) has 9 user reviews and SecurityScorecard has 18. The average star rating for Check Point Next Generation Firewalls (NGFW) is 4.33 while SecurityScorecard has an average rating of 4.05. Check Point Next Generation Firewalls (NGFW) has more positive reviews than SecurityScorecard. Comparing Check Point Next Generation Firewalls (NGFW) vs. SecurityScorecard reviews, Check Point Next Generation Firewalls (NGFW) has stronger overall reviews.
Check Point Next Generation Firewalls (NGFW) vs. SecurityScorecard both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Reporting & Analytics, Cloud Management, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Governance, Risk, & Compliance (GRC), Reminders/Alerts, Systems/Administrative, Customizable Items, Integration Options, Language & Speech, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of Check Point Next Generation Firewalls (NGFW) vs. SecurityScorecard, SecurityScorecard offers more of the most popular features and tools than Check Point Next Generation Firewalls (NGFW).
In our pricing comparison of Check Point Next Generation Firewalls (NGFW) vs. SecurityScorecard, SecurityScorecard's pricing starts at 0/month and is more affordable compared to SecurityScorecard's starting cost of 0/month.
Our comparison of Check Point Next Generation Firewalls (NGFW) vs. SecurityScorecard shows that SecurityScorecard scores higher in usability for setup & support, quality of support, ease of admin. Check Point Next Generation Firewalls (NGFW) scores higher in ease of use, meets requirements, learning curve, but SecurityScorecard has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
