In our comparison of Cerner vs. ChartLogic, ChartLogic is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
Using it is simple, the features are nicely connected.
It is old-fashioned.
Nice support.
Setup, processing, editing, and medications through electronics is easy.
Sometimes there are a few connectivity issues.
This is a normal program and I could deal it with all its shortcomings. But luckily there are better ones also available in the market.
It was great for the mental health side. The comprehensive assessments, releases, and forms could be customized into the system in the way we want it to be. Customer support was prompt in case there was any problem, especially with the super users.
The program is good, but it is outdated. The version did not work for all the departments. We would have preferred something like behavioral health overall, at least substance abuse could be included.
The program is user-friendly, intuitive, and packed with a lot of amazing features. I like that it lets me use smart fields, templates, and more. It also helps me save time when doing charting tasks as some of the template fields are already filled automatically.
E-Prescribing is terrible. It requires a lot of steps since this part of the program is not intuitive.
Using it is simple, the features are nicely connected.
It is old-fashioned.
This is a normal program and I could deal it with all its shortcomings. But luckily there are better ones also available in the market.
It was great for the mental health side. The comprehensive assessments, releases, and forms could be customized into the system in the way we want it to be. Customer support was prompt in case there was any problem, especially with the super users.
The program is good, but it is outdated. The version did not work for all the departments. We would have preferred something like behavioral health overall, at least substance abuse could be included.
Nice support.
Setup, processing, editing, and medications through electronics is easy.
Sometimes there are a few connectivity issues.
The program is user-friendly, intuitive, and packed with a lot of amazing features. I like that it lets me use smart fields, templates, and more. It also helps me save time when doing charting tasks as some of the template fields are already filled automatically.
E-Prescribing is terrible. It requires a lot of steps since this part of the program is not intuitive.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Cerner vs. ChartLogic, Cerner has 15 user reviews and ChartLogic has 8. The average star rating for Cerner is 3.93 while ChartLogic has an average rating of 3.12. Cerner has more positive reviews than ChartLogic. Comparing Cerner vs. ChartLogic reviews, Cerner has stronger overall reviews.
Cerner vs. ChartLogic both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Medical Practice Management Features, Patient Management, eRX, Medical Charting, Laboratory Management, Insurance Claim Management, Accounting Features, Cash Flow Management, Portal Types, Customizable Items, File Management, Appointments/Scheduling, Reporting & Analytics, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Compliance Accreditations, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of Cerner vs. ChartLogic, ChartLogic offers more of the most popular features and tools than Cerner.
In our pricing comparison of Cerner vs. ChartLogic, ChartLogic's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to ChartLogic's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of Cerner vs. ChartLogic shows that ChartLogic scores higher in usability for . Cerner scores higher in ease of use, meets requirements, learning curve, setup & support, quality of support, ease of admin, but ChartLogic has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
