In our comparison of CATS vs. SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
My company uses CATS daily for its recruiting database. It is the most comprehensive and flexible software that we have found so far.
Pros are great customer service, extensive info database, of information and flexibility to adapt to your needs.
No way to preview the cover page in a job pipeline, can't email multiple people to ask for reviews on multiple candidates.
Its user-friendly interface and various customization options make it a valuable asset for any organization.
Whether it's posting jobs for external or internal candidates, the process is incredibly straightforward. The option to control the visibility of job postings, whether public or private, adds a fantastic level of flexibility.
None
Intuitive and simple. Main motto is to get the job done.
No cons worth mentioning so far.
It has brought efficiency and structure to these essential aspects of our operations.
This solution provides a comprehensive platform for managing performance management and salary review efficiently.
There are instances where the platform is not as user-friendly as one would hope. Occasional mistakes can occur, which can be a source of frustration.
My company uses CATS daily for its recruiting database. It is the most comprehensive and flexible software that we have found so far.
Pros are great customer service, extensive info database, of information and flexibility to adapt to your needs.
No way to preview the cover page in a job pipeline, can't email multiple people to ask for reviews on multiple candidates.
Intuitive and simple. Main motto is to get the job done.
No cons worth mentioning so far.
Its user-friendly interface and various customization options make it a valuable asset for any organization.
Whether it's posting jobs for external or internal candidates, the process is incredibly straightforward. The option to control the visibility of job postings, whether public or private, adds a fantastic level of flexibility.
None
It has brought efficiency and structure to these essential aspects of our operations.
This solution provides a comprehensive platform for managing performance management and salary review efficiently.
There are instances where the platform is not as user-friendly as one would hope. Occasional mistakes can occur, which can be a source of frustration.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of CATS vs. SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, CATS has 52 user reviews and SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting has 13. The average star rating for CATS is 4.38 while SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting has an average rating of 4. CATS has more positive reviews than SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting. Comparing CATS vs. SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting reviews, CATS has stronger overall reviews.
CATS vs. SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Talent Management , Supported Channels, Language & Speech, Reporting & Analytics, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of CATS vs. SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting offers more of the most popular features and tools than CATS.
In our pricing comparison of CATS vs. SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting's pricing starts at $3/month and is more affordable compared to CATS's starting cost of $69/month.
Our comparison of CATS vs. SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting shows that SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, learning curve, setup & support. CATS scores higher in quality of support, ease of admin, but SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
