In our comparison of Canto vs. Webdam, Canto is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
My little team enjoyed the benefits of Canto because it has helped us save time and access the resources we need. Prior to Canto, we outsourced a lot of work and had to comb through email to identify several Google Drives, WeTransfers, and Dropboxes in order to get the materials we required. This was cumbersome and ineffective. Canto now lets me choose who sees what and what is preserved, plus it's a simple application to navigate. We gain from Canto's solution to the problem of disorganized media files since it helps us identify the materials we need faster and more easily.
Easy to organize and store all media files in one place, centralized location, control over who sees and what is saved, and saves time and effort
None
The platform is stable and in helping large companies share assets, it gets the job done. However, it has some fairly annoying upload processes and interface options.
Finding and sharing resources in a large team is eased by Bynder and navigating the rather friendly interface is simple.
Upload options for allocating photo metadata to fields in Bynder or auto-tagging assets based on metadata could be better. Has a frequently confusing “related assets” feature, compared to other systems it is expensive, and the display of file versions could be in a more friendly manner.
The app integrations have been key for us.
All assets are easier to find now
Cropping can cause distortion in images and I don't care for the general look of the library
It is a fantastic system.
Lacks a system app.
My little team enjoyed the benefits of Canto because it has helped us save time and access the resources we need. Prior to Canto, we outsourced a lot of work and had to comb through email to identify several Google Drives, WeTransfers, and Dropboxes in order to get the materials we required. This was cumbersome and ineffective. Canto now lets me choose who sees what and what is preserved, plus it's a simple application to navigate. We gain from Canto's solution to the problem of disorganized media files since it helps us identify the materials we need faster and more easily.
Easy to organize and store all media files in one place, centralized location, control over who sees and what is saved, and saves time and effort
None
The app integrations have been key for us.
All assets are easier to find now
Cropping can cause distortion in images and I don't care for the general look of the library
The platform is stable and in helping large companies share assets, it gets the job done. However, it has some fairly annoying upload processes and interface options.
Finding and sharing resources in a large team is eased by Bynder and navigating the rather friendly interface is simple.
Upload options for allocating photo metadata to fields in Bynder or auto-tagging assets based on metadata could be better. Has a frequently confusing “related assets” feature, compared to other systems it is expensive, and the display of file versions could be in a more friendly manner.
It is a fantastic system.
Lacks a system app.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Canto vs. Webdam, Canto has 16 user reviews and Webdam has 24. The average star rating for Canto is 4.12 while Webdam has an average rating of 4. Canto has more positive reviews than Webdam. Comparing Canto vs. Webdam reviews, Canto has stronger overall reviews.
Canto vs. Webdam both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Content Management System (CMS) Features, File Management, Supported File Formats, Signature Management, Data Management, Supported Content Types, Search Tools, Customizable Items, Reporting & Analytics, Systems/Administrative, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Cybersecurity Features, Third-Party Integrations, Microsoft 365, Compliance Accreditations, Supported Technologies, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of Canto vs. Webdam, Canto offers more of the most popular features and tools than Webdam.
In our pricing comparison of Canto vs. Webdam, Webdam's pricing starts at 0/month and is more affordable compared to Webdam's starting cost of 0/month.
Our comparison of Canto vs. Webdam shows that Canto scores higher in usability for meets requirements, learning curve, quality of support. Webdam scores higher in ease of use, setup & support, ease of admin, but Canto has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
