In our comparison of Canto vs. Joomla!, Canto is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
N/A
My little team enjoyed the benefits of Canto because it has helped us save time and access the resources we need. Prior to Canto, we outsourced a lot of work and had to comb through email to identify several Google Drives, WeTransfers, and Dropboxes in order to get the materials we required. This was cumbersome and ineffective. Canto now lets me choose who sees what and what is preserved, plus it's a simple application to navigate. We gain from Canto's solution to the problem of disorganized media files since it helps us identify the materials we need faster and more easily.
Easy to organize and store all media files in one place, centralized location, control over who sees and what is saved, and saves time and effort
None
From the PHP to the SQL database, Joomla offers the programmer the chance to debug simpler, manipulating and developing new templates, module spaces, and global modifications is simple, ability to maintain the updates thanks to the three separate sites on a single set up, and continuous software enhancement from the software’s developers. Our systems now run much faster as Joomla is becoming more restructured and less bloated.
Recently, the security updates have crashed our systems, the developers providing components and modules are minimal and the ones available haven’t been updating for years which is worrying, and the software’s core has some bloat.
The app integrations have been key for us.
All assets are easier to find now
Cropping can cause distortion in images and I don't care for the general look of the library
The admin panel is great. We can engage in professional development because of plenty of time. The availability of open-source code and many extensions available for different tasks are great.
A longer time is required to study the platform and fully understand the capabilities of Joomla.
My little team enjoyed the benefits of Canto because it has helped us save time and access the resources we need. Prior to Canto, we outsourced a lot of work and had to comb through email to identify several Google Drives, WeTransfers, and Dropboxes in order to get the materials we required. This was cumbersome and ineffective. Canto now lets me choose who sees what and what is preserved, plus it's a simple application to navigate. We gain from Canto's solution to the problem of disorganized media files since it helps us identify the materials we need faster and more easily.
Easy to organize and store all media files in one place, centralized location, control over who sees and what is saved, and saves time and effort
None
The app integrations have been key for us.
All assets are easier to find now
Cropping can cause distortion in images and I don't care for the general look of the library
From the PHP to the SQL database, Joomla offers the programmer the chance to debug simpler, manipulating and developing new templates, module spaces, and global modifications is simple, ability to maintain the updates thanks to the three separate sites on a single set up, and continuous software enhancement from the software’s developers. Our systems now run much faster as Joomla is becoming more restructured and less bloated.
Recently, the security updates have crashed our systems, the developers providing components and modules are minimal and the ones available haven’t been updating for years which is worrying, and the software’s core has some bloat.
The admin panel is great. We can engage in professional development because of plenty of time. The availability of open-source code and many extensions available for different tasks are great.
A longer time is required to study the platform and fully understand the capabilities of Joomla.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Canto vs. Joomla!, Joomla! has 30 user reviews and Canto has 16. The average star rating for Joomla! is 4.16 while Canto has an average rating of 4.12. Joomla! has more positive reviews than Canto. Comparing Canto vs. Joomla! reviews, Joomla! has stronger overall reviews.
Canto vs. Joomla! both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Content Management System (CMS) Features, File Management, Supported Content Types, Drag-and-Drop Builders/Designers, Language & Speech, Customizable Items, Systems/Administrative, Identity and Access Management (IAM), After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of Canto vs. Joomla!, Joomla! offers more of the most popular features and tools than Canto.
In our pricing comparison of Canto vs. Joomla!, Joomla!'s pricing starts at 0/month and is more affordable compared to Joomla!'s starting cost of 0/month.
Our comparison of Canto vs. Joomla! shows that Canto scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, learning curve, quality of support, ease of admin. Joomla! scores higher in setup & support, but Canto has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
