In our comparison of Canto vs. Concrete5, Canto is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
My little team enjoyed the benefits of Canto because it has helped us save time and access the resources we need. Prior to Canto, we outsourced a lot of work and had to comb through email to identify several Google Drives, WeTransfers, and Dropboxes in order to get the materials we required. This was cumbersome and ineffective. Canto now lets me choose who sees what and what is preserved, plus it's a simple application to navigate. We gain from Canto's solution to the problem of disorganized media files since it helps us identify the materials we need faster and more easily.
Easy to organize and store all media files in one place, centralized location, control over who sees and what is saved, and saves time and effort
None
Concrete5 is a powerful yet user-friendly CMS that offers dynamic solutions for various projects. Its cost-efficient marketplace, robust e-commerce features, and quick deployment capabilities make it valuable for web development needs. While a learning curve exists, the platform's benefits far outweigh occasional challenges.
For those requiring multi-language displays, Concrete5 seamlessly handles internationalization, catering to a global audience. Sites can be swiftly deployed with minimal costs, and end-users often require only minutes, not hours or days, for training. The platform's user-friendly nature contributes to swift adoption.
The technology underpinning Concrete5 has evolved over the years, introducing increased complexity. However, this doesn't impede less technical users from utilizing the platform effectively.
The app integrations have been key for us.
All assets are easier to find now
Cropping can cause distortion in images and I don't care for the general look of the library
This is a powerful system for web developers for developing a content management system without building a solution from the start or tricking a blog into a website.
Installation and having the system functioning takes some time.
My little team enjoyed the benefits of Canto because it has helped us save time and access the resources we need. Prior to Canto, we outsourced a lot of work and had to comb through email to identify several Google Drives, WeTransfers, and Dropboxes in order to get the materials we required. This was cumbersome and ineffective. Canto now lets me choose who sees what and what is preserved, plus it's a simple application to navigate. We gain from Canto's solution to the problem of disorganized media files since it helps us identify the materials we need faster and more easily.
Easy to organize and store all media files in one place, centralized location, control over who sees and what is saved, and saves time and effort
None
The app integrations have been key for us.
All assets are easier to find now
Cropping can cause distortion in images and I don't care for the general look of the library
Concrete5 is a powerful yet user-friendly CMS that offers dynamic solutions for various projects. Its cost-efficient marketplace, robust e-commerce features, and quick deployment capabilities make it valuable for web development needs. While a learning curve exists, the platform's benefits far outweigh occasional challenges.
For those requiring multi-language displays, Concrete5 seamlessly handles internationalization, catering to a global audience. Sites can be swiftly deployed with minimal costs, and end-users often require only minutes, not hours or days, for training. The platform's user-friendly nature contributes to swift adoption.
The technology underpinning Concrete5 has evolved over the years, introducing increased complexity. However, this doesn't impede less technical users from utilizing the platform effectively.
This is a powerful system for web developers for developing a content management system without building a solution from the start or tricking a blog into a website.
Installation and having the system functioning takes some time.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Canto vs. Concrete5, Concrete5 has 14 user reviews and Canto has 16. The average star rating for Concrete5 is 4.64 while Canto has an average rating of 4.12. Concrete5 has more positive reviews than Canto. Comparing Canto vs. Concrete5 reviews, Concrete5 has stronger overall reviews.
Canto vs. Concrete5 both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Content Management System (CMS) Features, File Management, Supported File Formats, Signature Management, Data Management, Supported Content Types, Search Tools, Customizable Items, Reporting & Analytics, Systems/Administrative, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Cybersecurity Features, Third-Party Integrations, Microsoft 365, Compliance Accreditations, Supported Technologies, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of Canto vs. Concrete5, Canto offers more of the most popular features and tools than Concrete5.
In our pricing comparison of Canto vs. Concrete5, Concrete5's pricing starts at 0/month and is more affordable compared to Concrete5's starting cost of 0/month.
Our comparison of Canto vs. Concrete5 shows that Canto scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, learning curve, ease of admin. Concrete5 scores higher in setup & support, quality of support, but Canto has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
