In our comparison of Blumira vs. ThreatConnect, ThreatConnect is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
Blumira stands out for its simple setup and easy configuration. It was quite easy to add our secured applications. But sometimes, because of its reliance on the cloud, alerts are delayed, which could lead to security flaws. In spite of this, Blumira's integration with our analytics platform improved our security posture greatly by giving us visibility into AD and other unsupported programs.
Simple to use, strongly secure
Slow alerts
For a small team, ThreatConnect proved effective in scaling and managing enterprise threat intelligence and threat hunting capabilities. However, as the complexity of Playbook design and integration increased, the software's potential was hindered, preventing the team from fully maximizing its benefits.
ThreatConnect offered the ability to gather, analyze, enhance, and distribute various types of data related to cybersecurity incidents and indicators of compromise across different customer environments. It allowed for tasks such as uploading a domain name, checking it against threat feeds, and enriching the data with additional information like news articles, reports, attribution, and determining the domain's prevalence across multiple client setups.
One of the drawbacks we encountered was the confusion and lack of proper documentation regarding the Playbooks that facilitated enrichment and integration with third-party tools like SIEM. The visual representation of coding concepts, where blocks were connected to one another, was intended to assist non-programmers in developing their capabilities. In reality, a more code-centric approach to Playbook development would have been more beneficial. We found ourselves with numerous questions and minimal guidance on how to address simple problems that could be easily tackled using Python.
Blumira effectively addresses the need to monitor remote users and VPN connections, allowing me to keep a close eye on these critical aspects of our network security.
The instant reports provided by Blumira are excellent, as they promptly alert me to potential security issues. Additionally, I find the weekly summary reports to be highly valuable.
While it's not necessarily a negative aspect, Blumira offers a wide range of sensors to choose from, which can be overwhelming at times. However, having a variety of options can also be advantageous.
Consider this risk management system that offers numerous possibilities for effortless detection of high-risk threats and a platform for record-keeping.
It is convenient for any company to efficiently prioritize potential high-risk issues. Additionally, it simplifies record maintenance, and ThreatConnect facilitates easy threat detection through actionable analysis.
There were no significant issues encountered during the implementation of ThreatConnect, and it even facilitated learning about the tools.
Blumira stands out for its simple setup and easy configuration. It was quite easy to add our secured applications. But sometimes, because of its reliance on the cloud, alerts are delayed, which could lead to security flaws. In spite of this, Blumira's integration with our analytics platform improved our security posture greatly by giving us visibility into AD and other unsupported programs.
Simple to use, strongly secure
Slow alerts
Blumira effectively addresses the need to monitor remote users and VPN connections, allowing me to keep a close eye on these critical aspects of our network security.
The instant reports provided by Blumira are excellent, as they promptly alert me to potential security issues. Additionally, I find the weekly summary reports to be highly valuable.
While it's not necessarily a negative aspect, Blumira offers a wide range of sensors to choose from, which can be overwhelming at times. However, having a variety of options can also be advantageous.
For a small team, ThreatConnect proved effective in scaling and managing enterprise threat intelligence and threat hunting capabilities. However, as the complexity of Playbook design and integration increased, the software's potential was hindered, preventing the team from fully maximizing its benefits.
ThreatConnect offered the ability to gather, analyze, enhance, and distribute various types of data related to cybersecurity incidents and indicators of compromise across different customer environments. It allowed for tasks such as uploading a domain name, checking it against threat feeds, and enriching the data with additional information like news articles, reports, attribution, and determining the domain's prevalence across multiple client setups.
One of the drawbacks we encountered was the confusion and lack of proper documentation regarding the Playbooks that facilitated enrichment and integration with third-party tools like SIEM. The visual representation of coding concepts, where blocks were connected to one another, was intended to assist non-programmers in developing their capabilities. In reality, a more code-centric approach to Playbook development would have been more beneficial. We found ourselves with numerous questions and minimal guidance on how to address simple problems that could be easily tackled using Python.
Consider this risk management system that offers numerous possibilities for effortless detection of high-risk threats and a platform for record-keeping.
It is convenient for any company to efficiently prioritize potential high-risk issues. Additionally, it simplifies record maintenance, and ThreatConnect facilitates easy threat detection through actionable analysis.
There were no significant issues encountered during the implementation of ThreatConnect, and it even facilitated learning about the tools.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Blumira vs. ThreatConnect, Blumira has 11 user reviews and ThreatConnect has 2. The average star rating for Blumira is 4.27 while ThreatConnect has an average rating of 3.5. Blumira has more positive reviews than ThreatConnect. Comparing Blumira vs. ThreatConnect reviews, Blumira has stronger overall reviews.
Blumira vs. ThreatConnect both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Reporting & Analytics, Systems/Administrative, Reminders/Alerts, Risk Management, Workflow Automation, Drag-and-Drop Builders/Designers, Collaboration Tools, Report Management, Customizable Items, Integration Options, Compliance Accreditations, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of Blumira vs. ThreatConnect, ThreatConnect offers more of the most popular features and tools than Blumira.
In our pricing comparison of Blumira vs. ThreatConnect, ThreatConnect's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to ThreatConnect's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of Blumira vs. ThreatConnect shows that ThreatConnect scores higher in usability for meets requirements, learning curve, ease of admin. Blumira scores higher in ease of use, setup & support, quality of support, but ThreatConnect has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
