In our comparison of AVG vs. Digital Guardian, AVG is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
The protection offered by this inexpensive software is robust.
Has nice and satisfactory occasional background scans. The price is fair for the robust security it offers.
Has fairly irritating and intrusive ads promoting updates or other solution from a like developer.
DG primarily addresses endpoint Data Loss Prevention (DLP) and DAR scanning. It helps to protect sensitive data on endpoints, ensuring compliance and preventing data leakage. The product's capabilities in these areas benefit me by providing greater control and security over my data assets.
I appreciate the level of support I have received while using Digital Guardian (DG). The support team has been helpful and responsive, enhancing my experience with the product.
One drawback is the lack of management of DAR (Data at Rest) scanners within the DG Management Console (DGMC). This limitation can be inconvenient when it comes to managing and configuring the scanners.
My computer has been functioning seamlessly since I installed AVG, operating it is simple, and it is user friendly.
While searching viruses, it runs terribly slowly.
Digital Guardian addresses issues related to agent communication and provides data loss prevention and enhanced security measures. The DLP process effectively blocks the unauthorized transfer of confidential data, ensuring data protection and reducing the risk of data breaches.
I appreciate that Digital Guardian's Data Loss Prevention (DLP) tool plays a vital role in secure data transmission. It effectively assigns policies to individual users, ensuring data protection.
There is room for improvement in the Helpdesk Support regarding technical aspects. Customized policies for groups of applications or people are currently unavailable. The console's GUI could be more user-friendly.
The protection offered by this inexpensive software is robust.
Has nice and satisfactory occasional background scans. The price is fair for the robust security it offers.
Has fairly irritating and intrusive ads promoting updates or other solution from a like developer.
My computer has been functioning seamlessly since I installed AVG, operating it is simple, and it is user friendly.
While searching viruses, it runs terribly slowly.
DG primarily addresses endpoint Data Loss Prevention (DLP) and DAR scanning. It helps to protect sensitive data on endpoints, ensuring compliance and preventing data leakage. The product's capabilities in these areas benefit me by providing greater control and security over my data assets.
I appreciate the level of support I have received while using Digital Guardian (DG). The support team has been helpful and responsive, enhancing my experience with the product.
One drawback is the lack of management of DAR (Data at Rest) scanners within the DG Management Console (DGMC). This limitation can be inconvenient when it comes to managing and configuring the scanners.
Digital Guardian addresses issues related to agent communication and provides data loss prevention and enhanced security measures. The DLP process effectively blocks the unauthorized transfer of confidential data, ensuring data protection and reducing the risk of data breaches.
I appreciate that Digital Guardian's Data Loss Prevention (DLP) tool plays a vital role in secure data transmission. It effectively assigns policies to individual users, ensuring data protection.
There is room for improvement in the Helpdesk Support regarding technical aspects. Customized policies for groups of applications or people are currently unavailable. The console's GUI could be more user-friendly.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of AVG vs. Digital Guardian, Digital Guardian has 16 user reviews and AVG has 161. The average star rating for Digital Guardian is 4.43 while AVG has an average rating of 4.36. Digital Guardian has more positive reviews than AVG. Comparing AVG vs. Digital Guardian reviews, Digital Guardian has stronger overall reviews.
AVG vs. Digital Guardian both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Reporting & Analytics, Device Management, Disaster Recovery, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Password Management, Systems/Administrative, Reminders/Alerts, Integration Options, After-Sales Service, Limits, Document Management. In our feature comparison of AVG vs. Digital Guardian, AVG offers more of the most popular features and tools than Digital Guardian.
In our pricing comparison of AVG vs. Digital Guardian, Digital Guardian's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to Digital Guardian's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of AVG vs. Digital Guardian shows that AVG scores higher in usability for setup & support. Digital Guardian scores higher in ease of use, meets requirements, learning curve, quality of support, ease of admin, but AVG has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
