In our comparison of AVG vs. CylanceENDPOINT, AVG is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
The protection offered by this inexpensive software is robust.
Has nice and satisfactory occasional background scans. The price is fair for the robust security it offers.
Has fairly irritating and intrusive ads promoting updates or other solution from a like developer.
This cybersecurity solution is excellent, in my opinion. It offers thorough coverage for a range of operating systems and is simple to install and maintain across a big network of devices. A significant benefit is the simplicity with which whitelists can be established up and mass quarantined. Reporting on and keeping an eye on malware families and threat patterns is made simple by the intuitive console. But occasionally, the script module might generate false positives, and if you're not careful, handling exceptions can be challenging. Real-time sandbox features are something else I would want to see included in the product.
Easy to deploy and manage policies, has coverage for various OS platforms, bulk quarantine across all hosts for a known threat and user friendly console for reporting
No real-time sandbox capabilities and false positive for the script module and could get tricky
My computer has been functioning seamlessly since I installed AVG, operating it is simple, and it is user friendly.
While searching viruses, it runs terribly slowly.
n/a
CylanceProtect has consistently been regarded as the top choice for endpoint protection in the market. It offers exceptional security for both Windows and Mac endpoints, delivering outstanding protection.
However, since its acquisition by Blackberry in 2019, the integration of the two companies has been somewhat clumsy. While the Cylance website dashboard was clean and user-friendly, the Blackberry website design feels outdated. Additionally, there have been delays in releasing the endpoint client for Mac OS Big Sur, which should have been available earlier with Catalina. The frequent false positives for Adobe CS updates have also been a source of frustration. As our licensing is set to expire next summer, I will be exploring alternative options
The protection offered by this inexpensive software is robust.
Has nice and satisfactory occasional background scans. The price is fair for the robust security it offers.
Has fairly irritating and intrusive ads promoting updates or other solution from a like developer.
My computer has been functioning seamlessly since I installed AVG, operating it is simple, and it is user friendly.
While searching viruses, it runs terribly slowly.
This cybersecurity solution is excellent, in my opinion. It offers thorough coverage for a range of operating systems and is simple to install and maintain across a big network of devices. A significant benefit is the simplicity with which whitelists can be established up and mass quarantined. Reporting on and keeping an eye on malware families and threat patterns is made simple by the intuitive console. But occasionally, the script module might generate false positives, and if you're not careful, handling exceptions can be challenging. Real-time sandbox features are something else I would want to see included in the product.
Easy to deploy and manage policies, has coverage for various OS platforms, bulk quarantine across all hosts for a known threat and user friendly console for reporting
No real-time sandbox capabilities and false positive for the script module and could get tricky
n/a
CylanceProtect has consistently been regarded as the top choice for endpoint protection in the market. It offers exceptional security for both Windows and Mac endpoints, delivering outstanding protection.
However, since its acquisition by Blackberry in 2019, the integration of the two companies has been somewhat clumsy. While the Cylance website dashboard was clean and user-friendly, the Blackberry website design feels outdated. Additionally, there have been delays in releasing the endpoint client for Mac OS Big Sur, which should have been available earlier with Catalina. The frequent false positives for Adobe CS updates have also been a source of frustration. As our licensing is set to expire next summer, I will be exploring alternative options
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of AVG vs. CylanceENDPOINT, AVG has 162 user reviews and CylanceENDPOINT has 10. The average star rating for AVG is 4.35 while CylanceENDPOINT has an average rating of 4. AVG has more positive reviews than CylanceENDPOINT. Comparing AVG vs. CylanceENDPOINT reviews, AVG has stronger overall reviews.
AVG vs. CylanceENDPOINT both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Reporting & Analytics, Device Management, Disaster Recovery, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Password Management, Systems/Administrative, Reminders/Alerts, Integration Options, After-Sales Service, Limits, File Management. In our feature comparison of AVG vs. CylanceENDPOINT, AVG offers more of the most popular features and tools than CylanceENDPOINT.
In our pricing comparison of AVG vs. CylanceENDPOINT, CylanceENDPOINT's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to CylanceENDPOINT's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of AVG vs. CylanceENDPOINT shows that CylanceENDPOINT scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, learning curve, quality of support, ease of admin. AVG scores higher in setup & support, but CylanceENDPOINT has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
