In our comparison of AT&T Managed Threat Detection and Response vs. ThreatConnect, ThreatConnect is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
N/A
* Vendor does not share prices.
By relieving the team from the exhaustive task of investigating all alerts, the product allows them to allocate their time and efforts towards more specific tasks and projects, leading to enhanced productivity.
The most valuable aspect is the ability to release the team from the burden of investigating every alert, enabling them to concentrate on more targeted tasks and projects. Moreover, the communication aspect is also commendable.
Limited storage quotas pose a challenge, especially for those operating on a tight budget.
For a small team, ThreatConnect proved effective in scaling and managing enterprise threat intelligence and threat hunting capabilities. However, as the complexity of Playbook design and integration increased, the software's potential was hindered, preventing the team from fully maximizing its benefits.
ThreatConnect offered the ability to gather, analyze, enhance, and distribute various types of data related to cybersecurity incidents and indicators of compromise across different customer environments. It allowed for tasks such as uploading a domain name, checking it against threat feeds, and enriching the data with additional information like news articles, reports, attribution, and determining the domain's prevalence across multiple client setups.
One of the drawbacks we encountered was the confusion and lack of proper documentation regarding the Playbooks that facilitated enrichment and integration with third-party tools like SIEM. The visual representation of coding concepts, where blocks were connected to one another, was intended to assist non-programmers in developing their capabilities. In reality, a more code-centric approach to Playbook development would have been more beneficial. We found ourselves with numerous questions and minimal guidance on how to address simple problems that could be easily tackled using Python.
By relieving the team from the exhaustive task of investigating all alerts, the product allows them to allocate their time and efforts towards more specific tasks and projects, leading to enhanced productivity.
The most valuable aspect is the ability to release the team from the burden of investigating every alert, enabling them to concentrate on more targeted tasks and projects. Moreover, the communication aspect is also commendable.
Limited storage quotas pose a challenge, especially for those operating on a tight budget.
Consider this risk management system that offers numerous possibilities for effortless detection of high-risk threats and a platform for record-keeping.
It is convenient for any company to efficiently prioritize potential high-risk issues. Additionally, it simplifies record maintenance, and ThreatConnect facilitates easy threat detection through actionable analysis.
There were no significant issues encountered during the implementation of ThreatConnect, and it even facilitated learning about the tools.
By relieving the team from the exhaustive task of investigating all alerts, the product allows them to allocate their time and efforts towards more specific tasks and projects, leading to enhanced productivity.
The most valuable aspect is the ability to release the team from the burden of investigating every alert, enabling them to concentrate on more targeted tasks and projects. Moreover, the communication aspect is also commendable.
Limited storage quotas pose a challenge, especially for those operating on a tight budget.
By relieving the team from the exhaustive task of investigating all alerts, the product allows them to allocate their time and efforts towards more specific tasks and projects, leading to enhanced productivity.
The most valuable aspect is the ability to release the team from the burden of investigating every alert, enabling them to concentrate on more targeted tasks and projects. Moreover, the communication aspect is also commendable.
Limited storage quotas pose a challenge, especially for those operating on a tight budget.
For a small team, ThreatConnect proved effective in scaling and managing enterprise threat intelligence and threat hunting capabilities. However, as the complexity of Playbook design and integration increased, the software's potential was hindered, preventing the team from fully maximizing its benefits.
ThreatConnect offered the ability to gather, analyze, enhance, and distribute various types of data related to cybersecurity incidents and indicators of compromise across different customer environments. It allowed for tasks such as uploading a domain name, checking it against threat feeds, and enriching the data with additional information like news articles, reports, attribution, and determining the domain's prevalence across multiple client setups.
One of the drawbacks we encountered was the confusion and lack of proper documentation regarding the Playbooks that facilitated enrichment and integration with third-party tools like SIEM. The visual representation of coding concepts, where blocks were connected to one another, was intended to assist non-programmers in developing their capabilities. In reality, a more code-centric approach to Playbook development would have been more beneficial. We found ourselves with numerous questions and minimal guidance on how to address simple problems that could be easily tackled using Python.
Consider this risk management system that offers numerous possibilities for effortless detection of high-risk threats and a platform for record-keeping.
It is convenient for any company to efficiently prioritize potential high-risk issues. Additionally, it simplifies record maintenance, and ThreatConnect facilitates easy threat detection through actionable analysis.
There were no significant issues encountered during the implementation of ThreatConnect, and it even facilitated learning about the tools.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of AT&T Managed Threat Detection and Response vs. ThreatConnect, AT&T Managed Threat Detection and Response has 4 user reviews and ThreatConnect has 2. The average star rating for AT&T Managed Threat Detection and Response is 4.75 while ThreatConnect has an average rating of 3.5. AT&T Managed Threat Detection and Response has more positive reviews than ThreatConnect. Comparing AT&T Managed Threat Detection and Response vs. ThreatConnect reviews, AT&T Managed Threat Detection and Response has stronger overall reviews.
AT&T Managed Threat Detection and Response vs. ThreatConnect both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Reporting & Analytics, Workflow Automation, Compliance Accreditations, Drag-and-Drop Builders/Designers, Collaboration Tools, Reminders/Alerts, Report Management, Systems/Administrative, Customizable Items, Integration Options, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of AT&T Managed Threat Detection and Response vs. ThreatConnect, ThreatConnect offers more of the most popular features and tools than AT&T Managed Threat Detection and Response.
In our pricing comparison of AT&T Managed Threat Detection and Response vs. ThreatConnect, ThreatConnect's pricing starts at 0/month and is more affordable compared to ThreatConnect's starting cost of 0/month.
Our comparison of AT&T Managed Threat Detection and Response vs. ThreatConnect shows that ThreatConnect scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, learning curve, ease of admin. AT&T Managed Threat Detection and Response scores higher in setup & support, but ThreatConnect has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
