In our comparison of AT&T Managed Threat Detection and Response vs. Proofpoint, Proofpoint is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
N/A
* Vendor does not share prices.
By relieving the team from the exhaustive task of investigating all alerts, the product allows them to allocate their time and efforts towards more specific tasks and projects, leading to enhanced productivity.
The most valuable aspect is the ability to release the team from the burden of investigating every alert, enabling them to concentrate on more targeted tasks and projects. Moreover, the communication aspect is also commendable.
Limited storage quotas pose a challenge, especially for those operating on a tight budget.
Stopping spam and malicious emails, but requires continual training and user management. Wanted to use SPF, DKIM, and DMARC features but couldn't get help from support.
The system works well with regular training and use of quarantine and daily digest for suspect emails.
Lack of initial and ongoing training, difficult sales rep, and poor support after the person managing the system left.
By relieving the team from the exhaustive task of investigating all alerts, the product allows them to allocate their time and efforts towards more specific tasks and projects, leading to enhanced productivity.
The most valuable aspect is the ability to release the team from the burden of investigating every alert, enabling them to concentrate on more targeted tasks and projects. Moreover, the communication aspect is also commendable.
Limited storage quotas pose a challenge, especially for those operating on a tight budget.
It's a reliable product that delivers on its promises.
Great coverage against phishing, malware, impersonation, and business exploits
The documentation for Google Workspace is notably deficient. This led to complications during our go-live phase due to conflicting information. Additionally, it took 45 minutes to connect with a resource through P1 support.
By relieving the team from the exhaustive task of investigating all alerts, the product allows them to allocate their time and efforts towards more specific tasks and projects, leading to enhanced productivity.
The most valuable aspect is the ability to release the team from the burden of investigating every alert, enabling them to concentrate on more targeted tasks and projects. Moreover, the communication aspect is also commendable.
Limited storage quotas pose a challenge, especially for those operating on a tight budget.
By relieving the team from the exhaustive task of investigating all alerts, the product allows them to allocate their time and efforts towards more specific tasks and projects, leading to enhanced productivity.
The most valuable aspect is the ability to release the team from the burden of investigating every alert, enabling them to concentrate on more targeted tasks and projects. Moreover, the communication aspect is also commendable.
Limited storage quotas pose a challenge, especially for those operating on a tight budget.
Stopping spam and malicious emails, but requires continual training and user management. Wanted to use SPF, DKIM, and DMARC features but couldn't get help from support.
The system works well with regular training and use of quarantine and daily digest for suspect emails.
Lack of initial and ongoing training, difficult sales rep, and poor support after the person managing the system left.
It's a reliable product that delivers on its promises.
Great coverage against phishing, malware, impersonation, and business exploits
The documentation for Google Workspace is notably deficient. This led to complications during our go-live phase due to conflicting information. Additionally, it took 45 minutes to connect with a resource through P1 support.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of AT&T Managed Threat Detection and Response vs. Proofpoint, AT&T Managed Threat Detection and Response has 4 user reviews and Proofpoint has 15. The average star rating for AT&T Managed Threat Detection and Response is 4.75 while Proofpoint has an average rating of 4.66. AT&T Managed Threat Detection and Response has more positive reviews than Proofpoint. Comparing AT&T Managed Threat Detection and Response vs. Proofpoint reviews, AT&T Managed Threat Detection and Response has stronger overall reviews.
AT&T Managed Threat Detection and Response vs. Proofpoint both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Reporting & Analytics, Device Management, Cloud Management, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Application Management, Supported Technologies, Systems/Administrative, Configuration Management, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of AT&T Managed Threat Detection and Response vs. Proofpoint, Proofpoint offers more of the most popular features and tools than AT&T Managed Threat Detection and Response.
In our pricing comparison of AT&T Managed Threat Detection and Response vs. Proofpoint, Proofpoint's pricing starts at 0/month and is more affordable compared to Proofpoint's starting cost of 0/month.
Our comparison of AT&T Managed Threat Detection and Response vs. Proofpoint shows that Proofpoint scores higher in usability for ease of use, learning curve, setup & support, ease of admin. AT&T Managed Threat Detection and Response scores higher in meets requirements, but Proofpoint has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
