In our comparison of AT&T Managed Threat Detection and Response vs. Perimeter 81, Perimeter 81 is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
N/A
N/A
By relieving the team from the exhaustive task of investigating all alerts, the product allows them to allocate their time and efforts towards more specific tasks and projects, leading to enhanced productivity.
The most valuable aspect is the ability to release the team from the burden of investigating every alert, enabling them to concentrate on more targeted tasks and projects. Moreover, the communication aspect is also commendable.
Limited storage quotas pose a challenge, especially for those operating on a tight budget.
Perimeter 81 assists me in safeguarding the personal and sensitive information of my customers. As someone who deals with such data, this product helps me ensure its security and protection.
The best aspect of Perimeter 81, as experienced by my company, is its flawless performance and speed. So far, I haven't encountered any issues, and everything has been working efficiently. I have no negative feedback to share.
There are no complaints or dislikes to mention at this time. Everything has been functioning well.
By relieving the team from the exhaustive task of investigating all alerts, the product allows them to allocate their time and efforts towards more specific tasks and projects, leading to enhanced productivity.
The most valuable aspect is the ability to release the team from the burden of investigating every alert, enabling them to concentrate on more targeted tasks and projects. Moreover, the communication aspect is also commendable.
Limited storage quotas pose a challenge, especially for those operating on a tight budget.
The product solves the problem of remote access by providing a SaaS solution with dedicated access points and IP address allocations. This greatly benefits our organization by ensuring secure and reliable remote access for our team members.
One of the standout features is how quickly and seamlessly we were able to replace our remote access solution during our SOC2 Type II process. Within just 15 minutes, we connected our G-Suite for SSO, implemented access restrictions for our GCP instances, configured IP whitelisting for our main SaaS services, and invited our entire team. The user-friendly native agent has made it easy for both technical and non-technical teams to use without any issues. Additionally, having access points in the specific geo-locations we needed (Israel, EMEA, and US) has greatly improved performance.
There isn't much to dislike, especially after exploring other solutions. However, it would be nice to have additional dashboards, bandwidth tracking, and more granular traffic control within the Perimeter 81 network as our company grows.
By relieving the team from the exhaustive task of investigating all alerts, the product allows them to allocate their time and efforts towards more specific tasks and projects, leading to enhanced productivity.
The most valuable aspect is the ability to release the team from the burden of investigating every alert, enabling them to concentrate on more targeted tasks and projects. Moreover, the communication aspect is also commendable.
Limited storage quotas pose a challenge, especially for those operating on a tight budget.
By relieving the team from the exhaustive task of investigating all alerts, the product allows them to allocate their time and efforts towards more specific tasks and projects, leading to enhanced productivity.
The most valuable aspect is the ability to release the team from the burden of investigating every alert, enabling them to concentrate on more targeted tasks and projects. Moreover, the communication aspect is also commendable.
Limited storage quotas pose a challenge, especially for those operating on a tight budget.
Perimeter 81 assists me in safeguarding the personal and sensitive information of my customers. As someone who deals with such data, this product helps me ensure its security and protection.
The best aspect of Perimeter 81, as experienced by my company, is its flawless performance and speed. So far, I haven't encountered any issues, and everything has been working efficiently. I have no negative feedback to share.
There are no complaints or dislikes to mention at this time. Everything has been functioning well.
The product solves the problem of remote access by providing a SaaS solution with dedicated access points and IP address allocations. This greatly benefits our organization by ensuring secure and reliable remote access for our team members.
One of the standout features is how quickly and seamlessly we were able to replace our remote access solution during our SOC2 Type II process. Within just 15 minutes, we connected our G-Suite for SSO, implemented access restrictions for our GCP instances, configured IP whitelisting for our main SaaS services, and invited our entire team. The user-friendly native agent has made it easy for both technical and non-technical teams to use without any issues. Additionally, having access points in the specific geo-locations we needed (Israel, EMEA, and US) has greatly improved performance.
There isn't much to dislike, especially after exploring other solutions. However, it would be nice to have additional dashboards, bandwidth tracking, and more granular traffic control within the Perimeter 81 network as our company grows.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of AT&T Managed Threat Detection and Response vs. Perimeter 81, Perimeter 81 has 15 user reviews and AT&T Managed Threat Detection and Response has 4. The average star rating for Perimeter 81 is 4.8 while AT&T Managed Threat Detection and Response has an average rating of 4.75. Perimeter 81 has more positive reviews than AT&T Managed Threat Detection and Response. Comparing AT&T Managed Threat Detection and Response vs. Perimeter 81 reviews, Perimeter 81 has stronger overall reviews.
AT&T Managed Threat Detection and Response vs. Perimeter 81 both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Reporting & Analytics, Device Management, Network Management, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Governance, Risk, & Compliance (GRC), Sync/Refresh, Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC) Integrations, After-Sales Service, Limits. In our feature comparison of AT&T Managed Threat Detection and Response vs. Perimeter 81, Perimeter 81 offers more of the most popular features and tools than AT&T Managed Threat Detection and Response.
In our pricing comparison of AT&T Managed Threat Detection and Response vs. Perimeter 81, Perimeter 81's pricing starts at 0/month and is more affordable compared to Perimeter 81's starting cost of 0/month.
Our comparison of AT&T Managed Threat Detection and Response vs. Perimeter 81 shows that Perimeter 81 scores higher in usability for learning curve, setup & support, quality of support, ease of admin. AT&T Managed Threat Detection and Response scores higher in ease of use, meets requirements, but Perimeter 81 has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
