In our comparison of ATS OnDemand vs. ApplicantStack, ATS OnDemand is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
Ensure you're precise in your communications regarding how you'd like your job pages to appear. Converse with the support team via phone and writing.
Software has great functionality, its design is continually being enhanced by the development team, has an exceptional customer support team which is very responsive and communicates in a courteous manner.
None
The systems organizational design for assessing applicants.
Monitoring data is hard due to the two disparate hiring modules.
Generally great software with a very responsive and factual support team.
Quite a complete hiring software
Not very user-friendly in terms of sending emails. It's not possible to email applicants from ATS as they always go to the spam folder.
Fantastic! Simple to work with and trace previous candidates.
Covers a wide base of applicants and compared to former hiring systems, this system gives us better feedback.
It doesn’t download the applicants straight into ADP.
Ensure you're precise in your communications regarding how you'd like your job pages to appear. Converse with the support team via phone and writing.
Software has great functionality, its design is continually being enhanced by the development team, has an exceptional customer support team which is very responsive and communicates in a courteous manner.
None
Generally great software with a very responsive and factual support team.
Quite a complete hiring software
Not very user-friendly in terms of sending emails. It's not possible to email applicants from ATS as they always go to the spam folder.
The systems organizational design for assessing applicants.
Monitoring data is hard due to the two disparate hiring modules.
Fantastic! Simple to work with and trace previous candidates.
Covers a wide base of applicants and compared to former hiring systems, this system gives us better feedback.
It doesn’t download the applicants straight into ADP.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of ATS OnDemand vs. ApplicantStack, ApplicantStack has 350 user reviews and ATS OnDemand has 26. The average star rating for ApplicantStack is 4.37 while ATS OnDemand has an average rating of 4.30. ApplicantStack has more positive reviews than ATS OnDemand. Comparing ATS OnDemand vs. ApplicantStack reviews, ApplicantStack has stronger overall reviews.
ATS OnDemand vs. ApplicantStack both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Talent Management , Human Resources (HR) Features, Supported Channels, Customizable Items, Portal Types, Reporting & Analytics, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Compliance Accreditations, Supported Technologies. In our feature comparison of ATS OnDemand vs. ApplicantStack, ATS OnDemand offers more of the most popular features and tools than ApplicantStack.
In our pricing comparison of ATS OnDemand vs. ApplicantStack, ApplicantStack's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to ApplicantStack's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of ATS OnDemand vs. ApplicantStack shows that ATS OnDemand scores higher in usability for ease of use, quality of support. ApplicantStack scores higher in meets requirements, learning curve, setup & support, ease of admin, but ATS OnDemand has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
