In our comparison of ApplicantStack vs. ZipRecruiter, ZipRecruiter is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
The systems organizational design for assessing applicants.
Monitoring data is hard due to the two disparate hiring modules.
This platform is effective for advertising and spreading the word about available job positions.
I suggest utilizing this resource to attract potential candidates and assess their level of engagement.
The advantage of this platform is that it can attract active candidates who are actively searching for opportunities.
Even if candidates do not meet the criteria, their applications are still showcased. It would be convenient to have a dedicated space to review them at your convenience.
Fantastic! Simple to work with and trace previous candidates.
Covers a wide base of applicants and compared to former hiring systems, this system gives us better feedback.
It doesn’t download the applicants straight into ADP.
ZipRecruiter helps us to find quality candidates for interview and subsequently to recruit. We greatly endorse this software.
Powerful search, wonderful interface, ability to send messages to people within the site, and a very exceptional customer support team.
Quite aggressive follow-ups from the sales personnel, and the search occasionally pulls in useless candidates.
The systems organizational design for assessing applicants.
Monitoring data is hard due to the two disparate hiring modules.
Fantastic! Simple to work with and trace previous candidates.
Covers a wide base of applicants and compared to former hiring systems, this system gives us better feedback.
It doesn’t download the applicants straight into ADP.
This platform is effective for advertising and spreading the word about available job positions.
I suggest utilizing this resource to attract potential candidates and assess their level of engagement.
The advantage of this platform is that it can attract active candidates who are actively searching for opportunities.
Even if candidates do not meet the criteria, their applications are still showcased. It would be convenient to have a dedicated space to review them at your convenience.
ZipRecruiter helps us to find quality candidates for interview and subsequently to recruit. We greatly endorse this software.
Powerful search, wonderful interface, ability to send messages to people within the site, and a very exceptional customer support team.
Quite aggressive follow-ups from the sales personnel, and the search occasionally pulls in useless candidates.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of ApplicantStack vs. ZipRecruiter, ApplicantStack has 350 user reviews and ZipRecruiter has 112. The average star rating for ApplicantStack is 4.37 while ZipRecruiter has an average rating of 4.14. ApplicantStack has more positive reviews than ZipRecruiter. Comparing ApplicantStack vs. ZipRecruiter reviews, ApplicantStack has stronger overall reviews.
ApplicantStack vs. ZipRecruiter both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Reporting & Analytics. In our feature comparison of ApplicantStack vs. ZipRecruiter, ApplicantStack offers more of the most popular features and tools than ZipRecruiter.
In our pricing comparison of ApplicantStack vs. ZipRecruiter, ZipRecruiter's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to ZipRecruiter's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of ApplicantStack vs. ZipRecruiter shows that ZipRecruiter scores higher in usability for ease of use, learning curve, ease of admin. ApplicantStack scores higher in meets requirements, setup & support, quality of support, but ZipRecruiter has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
