In our comparison of Acunetix vs. Webroot, Acunetix is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
We utilize Acunetix to conduct periodic scans of our product, ensuring that any new features added are scanned before their public release. The main benefit for us is the quick turnaround time for security scans, with the ability to receive a comprehensive Developers report. Additionally, the flexibility to generate reports in other formats, such as OWASP, proves valuable for our security team and business needs.
The best feature of Acunetix OVS is its ability to scan our product for vulnerabilities with every release. Setting up the scan and generating reports for developers is easy, providing them with a clear description of the identified vulnerabilities along with test cases. Additionally, running the tests and receiving the report within a few hours allows for quick iterations and rechecking of security after developers have addressed the issues.
Occasionally, the scan duration can be lengthy, prompting us to run it overnight. However, this is not a significant issue for us as it aligns with our infrastructure's optimization strategy, avoiding stress on it during working hours.
Webroot gives us the tools we need to be proactive in defending our clients from cyber attacks, and it is simple to setup and monitor. The support staff is also excellent, accommodating, and knowledgeable. Our only two criticisms are that updating software exceptions can occasionally be challenging and that, particularly in the healthcare sector, we still frequently need assistance from the support service.
Easy to deploy and monitor, proactive protection against threats
and fantastic support team
Difficulty in understanding how to update software exceptions
The product offers a quick and effective solution for rapidly testing websites for vulnerabilities. This saves time and allows for prompt identification and mitigation of security risks. Additionally, the availability of an API adds further convenience and flexibility for integrating the solution into existing workflows.
I appreciate that the product offers rapid scanning of websites with constantly updated vulnerability checks. It is particularly focused on platform-specific vulnerabilities, such as AEM-specific vulnerabilities. This ensures thorough scanning and protection.
The target license model can be a bit cumbersome. There are issues with deleting targets within a certain time frame and targets carrying over from previous years, which count against your total. It would be better if the target count could be reset and if there was an option to selectively count previous year's targets within a subsequent year.
A very light endpoint security solution with a rapid deployment process. It doesn't need virus definition updates and can be set to interact with EDR systems, making it the best choice for small organizations with low resources. Furthermore, Webroot BEP interacts with the majority of Remote Monitoring and Management solutions, making deployment and upkeep simpler. If malware does infiltrate a system, Webroot BEP might be resource-intensive throughout the quarantine and cleanup phase.
Lightweight, quick to deploy and no need for virus definition updates
Can be resource intensive during quarantine and cleanup
We utilize Acunetix to conduct periodic scans of our product, ensuring that any new features added are scanned before their public release. The main benefit for us is the quick turnaround time for security scans, with the ability to receive a comprehensive Developers report. Additionally, the flexibility to generate reports in other formats, such as OWASP, proves valuable for our security team and business needs.
The best feature of Acunetix OVS is its ability to scan our product for vulnerabilities with every release. Setting up the scan and generating reports for developers is easy, providing them with a clear description of the identified vulnerabilities along with test cases. Additionally, running the tests and receiving the report within a few hours allows for quick iterations and rechecking of security after developers have addressed the issues.
Occasionally, the scan duration can be lengthy, prompting us to run it overnight. However, this is not a significant issue for us as it aligns with our infrastructure's optimization strategy, avoiding stress on it during working hours.
The product offers a quick and effective solution for rapidly testing websites for vulnerabilities. This saves time and allows for prompt identification and mitigation of security risks. Additionally, the availability of an API adds further convenience and flexibility for integrating the solution into existing workflows.
I appreciate that the product offers rapid scanning of websites with constantly updated vulnerability checks. It is particularly focused on platform-specific vulnerabilities, such as AEM-specific vulnerabilities. This ensures thorough scanning and protection.
The target license model can be a bit cumbersome. There are issues with deleting targets within a certain time frame and targets carrying over from previous years, which count against your total. It would be better if the target count could be reset and if there was an option to selectively count previous year's targets within a subsequent year.
Webroot gives us the tools we need to be proactive in defending our clients from cyber attacks, and it is simple to setup and monitor. The support staff is also excellent, accommodating, and knowledgeable. Our only two criticisms are that updating software exceptions can occasionally be challenging and that, particularly in the healthcare sector, we still frequently need assistance from the support service.
Easy to deploy and monitor, proactive protection against threats
and fantastic support team
Difficulty in understanding how to update software exceptions
A very light endpoint security solution with a rapid deployment process. It doesn't need virus definition updates and can be set to interact with EDR systems, making it the best choice for small organizations with low resources. Furthermore, Webroot BEP interacts with the majority of Remote Monitoring and Management solutions, making deployment and upkeep simpler. If malware does infiltrate a system, Webroot BEP might be resource-intensive throughout the quarantine and cleanup phase.
Lightweight, quick to deploy and no need for virus definition updates
Can be resource intensive during quarantine and cleanup
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Acunetix vs. Webroot, Webroot has 15 user reviews and Acunetix has 19. The average star rating for Webroot is 4.53 while Acunetix has an average rating of 4.36. Webroot has more positive reviews than Acunetix. Comparing Acunetix vs. Webroot reviews, Webroot has stronger overall reviews.
Acunetix vs. Webroot both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Reporting & Analytics, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Device Management, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Application Management, Network Management, Compliance Accreditations, Systems/Administrative, Customizable Items, Third-Party Integrations, Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC) Integrations, Reminders/Alerts, Drag-and-Drop Builders/Designers, After-Sales Service, Limits. In our feature comparison of Acunetix vs. Webroot, Acunetix offers more of the most popular features and tools than Webroot.
In our pricing comparison of Acunetix vs. Webroot, Webroot's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to Webroot's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of Acunetix vs. Webroot shows that Webroot scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, learning curve, setup & support, quality of support, ease of admin. Acunetix scores higher in , but Webroot has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
