Acquia CMS vs. M-Files: Which is Best? - Wheelhouse

Acquia CMS vs. M-Files: Which is Best?

Acquia CMS vs. M-Files Best Overall: M-Files

In our comparison of Acquia CMS vs. M-Files, M-Files is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.

Quick Info

Acquia CMS Quick Info
WH Score:
8.1
Pricing Score:
8.0
Feature Score:
7.6
Usability Score:
8.1
Company Size:All Sizes
Platforms:
M-Files Quick Info
WH Score:
8.2
Pricing Score:
7.9
Feature Score:
7.6
Usability Score:
7.7
Company Size:All Sizes
Platforms:

Pricing

Acquia CMS Pricing
Price Range
Contact Us

* Vendor does not share prices.

M-Files Pricing
Price Range
Contact Us

* Vendor does not share prices.

Features

Acquia CMS Features
  • Multimedia Management
  • Digital Experience Platform (DXP)
  • Website/App Development
  • Search Engine Optimization (SEO)
  • Content Lifecycle Management
  • Document Display
  • Document Tagging
  • Document Scanning
  • File Sharing
  • Version Control
  • Contract Lifecycle Management
  • PDF
  • JPG
  • PNG
  • MP4
M-Files Features
  • Multimedia Management
  • Digital Experience Platform (DXP)
  • Website/App Development
  • Search Engine Optimization (SEO)
  • Content Lifecycle Management
  • Document Display
  • Document Tagging
  • Document Scanning
  • File Sharing
  • Version Control
  • Contract Lifecycle Management
  • PDF
  • JPG
  • PNG
  • MP4

Pros & Cons

Acquia CMS Pros & Cons
Pros
  • For those considering this software, it is important to weigh the costs and benefits to determine if it is the right choice for your business
  • .
Cons
  • It is not free.
M-Files Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Using it is simple, the interface looks modest, perfectly functioning collaboration with MS Office apps, when added to the software, add-ons for M-Files are functioning well, workflows are customizable, M-Files functions on disparate platforms, and through M-Files, you can save and share documents.
Cons
  • Extremely terrible client support.

Reviews

Acquia CMS Reviews
Top Favorable Review
R
Ruby
Reviewed on Jul 2, 2021

Overall, investing in digital technology can greatly improve business processes and allow for growth and customer relationship-building.

For those considering this software, it is important to weigh the costs and benefits to determine if it is the right choice for your business.

Although it has a high cost of 100k per year, the software has numerous benefits. It is easy to use and provides technical assistance, making it one of the best in its field. Additionally, it offers excellent technical support and is very reliable.

Top Critical Review
G
Gregory
Reviewed on Jul 2, 2021

Getting non-technical personnel in our company involved in our current websites management is simpler and the user experience functionality is enhanced.

It is not free.

M-Files Reviews
Top Favorable Review
L
Lorene
Reviewed on Jul 2, 2021

File accessibility through your computers main software, a web browser or mobile app is possible using this software. The way of working on documents are changing and becoming more effective using the aid of digital workflows. Documents can hardly get lost, stolen, or unauthorized access trials as you can get security for your private or company files using M-Files.

Using it is simple, the interface looks modest, perfectly functioning collaboration with MS Office apps, when added to the software, add-ons for M-Files are functioning well, workflows are customizable, M-Files functions on disparate platforms, and through M-Files, you can save and share documents.

An extremely tedious process of locating documents or files-to get the right search outcomes, you have to use the right keyword.

Top Critical Review
G
Gay
Reviewed on Jul 2, 2021

I cannot regret using M-files as it is affordable and it the best when it comes to organizing and saving office documents.

Implementing and working with M-Files is simple, it is an extremely quick software, searching for documents is simple, it is an essential software for any office as it is incredibly secure, and it provides a simple method to maintain organization of items and in the correct place in the office.

Extremely terrible client support.

Alternatives

Acquia CMS Alternatives
M-Files Alternatives
Add to Compare

Add suggested to comparison

Acquia CMS vs. M-Files: Detailed Comparison

Acquia CMS vs. M-Files Top Ratings & Reviews: M-Files

In our rating and review comparison of Acquia CMS vs. M-Files, M-Files has 19 user reviews and Acquia CMS has 9. The average star rating for M-Files is 4.42 while Acquia CMS has an average rating of 3.77. M-Files has more positive reviews than Acquia CMS. Comparing Acquia CMS vs. M-Files reviews, M-Files has stronger overall reviews.

Acquia CMS vs. M-Files Best Features & Functionality: Acquia CMS

Acquia CMS vs. M-Files both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Content Management System (CMS) Features, Supported File Formats, Data Management, Supported Content Types, Language & Speech, Customizable Items, Reporting & Analytics, Systems/Administrative, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Password Management, Cybersecurity Features, Disaster Recovery, Integration Options, Third-Party Integrations, Adobe. In our feature comparison of Acquia CMS vs. M-Files, Acquia CMS offers more of the most popular features and tools than M-Files.

Acquia CMS vs. M-Files Best Pricing: M-Files

In our pricing comparison of Acquia CMS vs. M-Files, M-Files's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to M-Files's starting cost of N/A/month.

Acquia CMS vs. M-Files Best Usability: Acquia CMS

Our comparison of Acquia CMS vs. M-Files shows that Acquia CMS scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, learning curve, setup & support, quality of support, ease of admin. M-Files scores higher in , but Acquia CMS has the best scores overall for system usability.

The right software for your business

Get your personalized recommendations now.