In our comparison of A10 vs. ThreatConnect, ThreatConnect is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
The product provides a comprehensive solution for safeguarding against DDoS and similar attacks. Users can rely on this software to protect their databases, as it actively monitors potential threats, offering peace of mind.
User-friendly and can be easily integrated into existing systems. It stands out with its superior traffic control capabilities, effectively limiting access to suspicious visitors. Additionally, it offers excellent website and infrastructure protection.
The subscription cost is relatively high, and the technical support team is not very responsive. The IT alert system could use improvement to effectively capture important events. Furthermore, the anomaly detection feature occasionally experiences performance issues.
For a small team, ThreatConnect proved effective in scaling and managing enterprise threat intelligence and threat hunting capabilities. However, as the complexity of Playbook design and integration increased, the software's potential was hindered, preventing the team from fully maximizing its benefits.
ThreatConnect offered the ability to gather, analyze, enhance, and distribute various types of data related to cybersecurity incidents and indicators of compromise across different customer environments. It allowed for tasks such as uploading a domain name, checking it against threat feeds, and enriching the data with additional information like news articles, reports, attribution, and determining the domain's prevalence across multiple client setups.
One of the drawbacks we encountered was the confusion and lack of proper documentation regarding the Playbooks that facilitated enrichment and integration with third-party tools like SIEM. The visual representation of coding concepts, where blocks were connected to one another, was intended to assist non-programmers in developing their capabilities. In reality, a more code-centric approach to Playbook development would have been more beneficial. We found ourselves with numerous questions and minimal guidance on how to address simple problems that could be easily tackled using Python.
Using the A10 Thunder TPS DDOS Service, I no longer have to worry about getting bored, as its automation allows me to anticipate and handle potential threats. I am delighted to have accomplished such a feat and overcome a significant challenge.
I find all the modules to be comfortable in terms of providing enhanced security against denial-of-service attacks.
I have not encountered any disadvantages so far.
Consider this risk management system that offers numerous possibilities for effortless detection of high-risk threats and a platform for record-keeping.
It is convenient for any company to efficiently prioritize potential high-risk issues. Additionally, it simplifies record maintenance, and ThreatConnect facilitates easy threat detection through actionable analysis.
There were no significant issues encountered during the implementation of ThreatConnect, and it even facilitated learning about the tools.
The product provides a comprehensive solution for safeguarding against DDoS and similar attacks. Users can rely on this software to protect their databases, as it actively monitors potential threats, offering peace of mind.
User-friendly and can be easily integrated into existing systems. It stands out with its superior traffic control capabilities, effectively limiting access to suspicious visitors. Additionally, it offers excellent website and infrastructure protection.
The subscription cost is relatively high, and the technical support team is not very responsive. The IT alert system could use improvement to effectively capture important events. Furthermore, the anomaly detection feature occasionally experiences performance issues.
Using the A10 Thunder TPS DDOS Service, I no longer have to worry about getting bored, as its automation allows me to anticipate and handle potential threats. I am delighted to have accomplished such a feat and overcome a significant challenge.
I find all the modules to be comfortable in terms of providing enhanced security against denial-of-service attacks.
I have not encountered any disadvantages so far.
For a small team, ThreatConnect proved effective in scaling and managing enterprise threat intelligence and threat hunting capabilities. However, as the complexity of Playbook design and integration increased, the software's potential was hindered, preventing the team from fully maximizing its benefits.
ThreatConnect offered the ability to gather, analyze, enhance, and distribute various types of data related to cybersecurity incidents and indicators of compromise across different customer environments. It allowed for tasks such as uploading a domain name, checking it against threat feeds, and enriching the data with additional information like news articles, reports, attribution, and determining the domain's prevalence across multiple client setups.
One of the drawbacks we encountered was the confusion and lack of proper documentation regarding the Playbooks that facilitated enrichment and integration with third-party tools like SIEM. The visual representation of coding concepts, where blocks were connected to one another, was intended to assist non-programmers in developing their capabilities. In reality, a more code-centric approach to Playbook development would have been more beneficial. We found ourselves with numerous questions and minimal guidance on how to address simple problems that could be easily tackled using Python.
Consider this risk management system that offers numerous possibilities for effortless detection of high-risk threats and a platform for record-keeping.
It is convenient for any company to efficiently prioritize potential high-risk issues. Additionally, it simplifies record maintenance, and ThreatConnect facilitates easy threat detection through actionable analysis.
There were no significant issues encountered during the implementation of ThreatConnect, and it even facilitated learning about the tools.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of A10 vs. ThreatConnect, A10 has 2 user reviews and ThreatConnect has 2. The average star rating for A10 is 4 while ThreatConnect has an average rating of 3.5. A10 has more positive reviews than ThreatConnect. Comparing A10 vs. ThreatConnect reviews, A10 has stronger overall reviews.
A10 vs. ThreatConnect both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Reporting & Analytics, Workflow Automation, Drag-and-Drop Builders/Designers, Collaboration Tools, Reminders/Alerts, Report Management, Systems/Administrative, Customizable Items, Integration Options, Compliance Accreditations, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of A10 vs. ThreatConnect, ThreatConnect offers more of the most popular features and tools than A10.
In our pricing comparison of A10 vs. ThreatConnect, ThreatConnect's pricing starts at 0/month and is more affordable compared to ThreatConnect's starting cost of 0/month.
Our comparison of A10 vs. ThreatConnect shows that ThreatConnect scores higher in usability for ease of use, learning curve, ease of admin. A10 scores higher in meets requirements, quality of support, but ThreatConnect has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
