In our comparison of Teamwork vs. Workfront, Teamwork is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
General Comments: As I’ve learned it so it is a breeze to me.
Tracking the tasks and milestones, and managing all related to my project is easy with it.
At the start, it seems difficult but with the passage of time it becomes easy.
Extremely hard interaction and acquisition.
Has an amazing appearance, operating it is simple, and befitting functionality to our company.
Installing and operating it is hard, missing detailed resourcing practicality, and it is hard to know the product deciding the client’s trail.
Great organizer of tasks and schedules. Not much training stuff is available which is a bit frustrating. Third-party professionals are referred for resolving the issues. Though customer service is quick but not helpful. The mobile app is clunky.
Teamwork is with us for many years and I simply love it. To-do list, goal, team, commenting, communication threads, chaining tasks together, assigning tasks, connecting the drive, and logging time is some of its great features.
The team's workload can not be predicted weekly. Very little functionality regarding tracking time. Dragging the tasks is required. Workload view should be there to see the hours logged. Working on multiple tasks simultaneously is cumbersome with Teamwork.
Our exclusive PM software is Workfront. Using it, we handle internal projects, customer-facing, and submit new projects via it, and we do hour reporting every month.
Tagging internal task proprietors with notifications and queries is a vital ability, the ability to view if a project is on course for the timeline that is agreed upon in a customer-facing job, exporting hours at the end when we look back on resource reporting after submission and approval of projects via the software is done is possible thanks to the main functionalities, and the ability to see the development status of a project, the person responsible, and the problems that should be addressed if any during high level project management is great.
Failure to at times notice the action awaiting you if you have numerous projects in Workfront as the software has a very tiny Notifications button, a learning curve exists.
General Comments: As I’ve learned it so it is a breeze to me.
Tracking the tasks and milestones, and managing all related to my project is easy with it.
At the start, it seems difficult but with the passage of time it becomes easy.
Great organizer of tasks and schedules. Not much training stuff is available which is a bit frustrating. Third-party professionals are referred for resolving the issues. Though customer service is quick but not helpful. The mobile app is clunky.
Teamwork is with us for many years and I simply love it. To-do list, goal, team, commenting, communication threads, chaining tasks together, assigning tasks, connecting the drive, and logging time is some of its great features.
The team's workload can not be predicted weekly. Very little functionality regarding tracking time. Dragging the tasks is required. Workload view should be there to see the hours logged. Working on multiple tasks simultaneously is cumbersome with Teamwork.
Extremely hard interaction and acquisition.
Has an amazing appearance, operating it is simple, and befitting functionality to our company.
Installing and operating it is hard, missing detailed resourcing practicality, and it is hard to know the product deciding the client’s trail.
Our exclusive PM software is Workfront. Using it, we handle internal projects, customer-facing, and submit new projects via it, and we do hour reporting every month.
Tagging internal task proprietors with notifications and queries is a vital ability, the ability to view if a project is on course for the timeline that is agreed upon in a customer-facing job, exporting hours at the end when we look back on resource reporting after submission and approval of projects via the software is done is possible thanks to the main functionalities, and the ability to see the development status of a project, the person responsible, and the problems that should be addressed if any during high level project management is great.
Failure to at times notice the action awaiting you if you have numerous projects in Workfront as the software has a very tiny Notifications button, a learning curve exists.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Teamwork vs. Workfront, Teamwork has 163 user reviews and Workfront has 178. The average star rating for Teamwork is 4.55 while Workfront has an average rating of 4.43. Teamwork has more positive reviews than Workfront. Comparing Teamwork vs. Workfront reviews, Teamwork has stronger overall reviews.
Teamwork vs. Workfront both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Project Management Features, Task Management, Customizable Items, Portal Types, Attendance Management, Collaboration Tools, Appointments/Scheduling, Layout Types, Chart Types, Reporting & Analytics, Systems/Administrative, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Integration Options, Third-Party Integrations, Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, Accounting Features, After-Sales Service, Limits, Business Units/Areas Covered. In our feature comparison of Teamwork vs. Workfront, Teamwork offers more of the most popular features and tools than Workfront.
In our pricing comparison of Teamwork vs. Workfront, Workfront's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to Workfront's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of Teamwork vs. Workfront shows that Teamwork scores higher in usability for ease of use, learning curve, quality of support. Workfront scores higher in meets requirements, setup & support, ease of admin, but Teamwork has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
