In our comparison of SAP Enterprise Portfolio and Project Management vs. Targetprocess, SAP Enterprise Portfolio and Project Management is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
N/A
* Vendor does not share prices.
The experience of learning the modules of this software was great. The purchasing, manufacturing, and quality control modules are some of the modules I have used on a regular basis for my teams operations. Professionals in large institutions are highly encouraged to license this software.
The most interesting feature of this software is the multi-dimensional utility for various departments. From shipping, receiving, planning, insurance, manufacturing, etc. this tool is very useful, it offers a transparent system for a processes’ overview via disparate modules, when it comes to inventory management, quality metrics, batch scheduling, etc. it is very productive, and in order to streamline operations this solution is essential for all large institutions.
Limited availability of software experts to teach on the software and novices find it complicated to learn the software.
We’re able to monitor the mistakes viewed on our websites and pages using TargetProcess.
The update is fairly irregular.
Using it is extremely simple, it has pleasant and exceptional graphics for all users, a very quick and organized manner to move cards regarding our work procedures, and using Target Process, we’re able to easily create, edit and allocate cards.
All in all, we’re contented with the final tool and we’ve had a great and pleasant experience. However, in order to offer a more comprehensive tool to their customers and attract more prospective customers to join their portfolio, much more needs to be done to this software.
Using it is easy, it is extremely functional, has well designed integrations, very useful in maintaining your business’s accounting control, and regarding linking your customers and providers with their individual invoices, it is extremely useful.
Extremely terrible client care support-very slow when updating the system.
All our business requirements are supported by TP while practicing a few agile methodologies in our tasks. Its blog is amazing and plays a great role in helping new staff learn the onboard process.
System downtime is extremely rare, its blogs are helpful, the “follow” option on products in TP is good, has adaptable licensing which makes it simple to add/remove team members, the systems DSL used in filters and search is nice, my adaptability with user administration as an admin is great, and it has a natural UI despite being extremely complex.
It is pricey, picking up and installing some reports, graphs, and dashboards is extremely difficult, it is at times slow to paste pictures to descriptions, descriptions on products are sometimes unsteady, and a few incorporations that other systems support is lacking
The experience of learning the modules of this software was great. The purchasing, manufacturing, and quality control modules are some of the modules I have used on a regular basis for my teams operations. Professionals in large institutions are highly encouraged to license this software.
The most interesting feature of this software is the multi-dimensional utility for various departments. From shipping, receiving, planning, insurance, manufacturing, etc. this tool is very useful, it offers a transparent system for a processes’ overview via disparate modules, when it comes to inventory management, quality metrics, batch scheduling, etc. it is very productive, and in order to streamline operations this solution is essential for all large institutions.
Limited availability of software experts to teach on the software and novices find it complicated to learn the software.
All in all, we’re contented with the final tool and we’ve had a great and pleasant experience. However, in order to offer a more comprehensive tool to their customers and attract more prospective customers to join their portfolio, much more needs to be done to this software.
Using it is easy, it is extremely functional, has well designed integrations, very useful in maintaining your business’s accounting control, and regarding linking your customers and providers with their individual invoices, it is extremely useful.
Extremely terrible client care support-very slow when updating the system.
We’re able to monitor the mistakes viewed on our websites and pages using TargetProcess.
The update is fairly irregular.
Using it is extremely simple, it has pleasant and exceptional graphics for all users, a very quick and organized manner to move cards regarding our work procedures, and using Target Process, we’re able to easily create, edit and allocate cards.
All our business requirements are supported by TP while practicing a few agile methodologies in our tasks. Its blog is amazing and plays a great role in helping new staff learn the onboard process.
System downtime is extremely rare, its blogs are helpful, the “follow” option on products in TP is good, has adaptable licensing which makes it simple to add/remove team members, the systems DSL used in filters and search is nice, my adaptability with user administration as an admin is great, and it has a natural UI despite being extremely complex.
It is pricey, picking up and installing some reports, graphs, and dashboards is extremely difficult, it is at times slow to paste pictures to descriptions, descriptions on products are sometimes unsteady, and a few incorporations that other systems support is lacking
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of SAP Enterprise Portfolio and Project Management vs. Targetprocess, Targetprocess has 134 user reviews and SAP Enterprise Portfolio and Project Management has 75. The average star rating for Targetprocess is 4.58 while SAP Enterprise Portfolio and Project Management has an average rating of 4.24. Targetprocess has more positive reviews than SAP Enterprise Portfolio and Project Management. Comparing SAP Enterprise Portfolio and Project Management vs. Targetprocess reviews, Targetprocess has stronger overall reviews.
SAP Enterprise Portfolio and Project Management vs. Targetprocess both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Project Management Features, Task Management, Resource Management, Project Management Methodology, Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC) Integrations, Customizable Items, Collaboration Tools, File Management, Chat/IM Management, Appointments/Scheduling, Cash Flow Management, Chart Types, Reporting & Analytics, Customer Management, Systems/Administrative, Integration Options, Third-Party Integrations, Governance, Risk, & Compliance (GRC), After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of SAP Enterprise Portfolio and Project Management vs. Targetprocess, SAP Enterprise Portfolio and Project Management offers more of the most popular features and tools than Targetprocess.
In our pricing comparison of SAP Enterprise Portfolio and Project Management vs. Targetprocess, Targetprocess's pricing starts at 0/month and is more affordable compared to Targetprocess's starting cost of 0/month.
Our comparison of SAP Enterprise Portfolio and Project Management vs. Targetprocess shows that SAP Enterprise Portfolio and Project Management scores higher in usability for setup & support, ease of admin. Targetprocess scores higher in ease of use, meets requirements, learning curve, quality of support, but SAP Enterprise Portfolio and Project Management has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
