In our comparison of QRadar SIEM vs. SailPoint, QRadar SIEM is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
QRadar effectively addresses the need to monitor, investigate, detect, and respond to threats on devices and endpoints within the environment. Its logs retention capability is commendable, and it efficiently collates and analyzes large amounts of data from both cloud and on-site sources, providing valuable insights for security operations.
One of the best aspects of QRadar is its ability to assist in threat detection and response, providing a comprehensive solution for remediating threats. Its open architecture allows for deployment on various platforms, including on-premises, cloud, or as a service. The integration capabilities with EDR, SIEM, SOAR, and other threat intelligence tools enable a unified and comprehensive XDR approach.
There are a few areas that could be improved. The EPS cap, which limits the number of logs that can be integrated into QRadar, can sometimes result in generating false positives. Additionally, the user-friendliness of the platform could be enhanced, especially in terms of setting rules, which can be a bit challenging.
I value its capacity to automate certification procedures, life cycle events, and to offer a thorough overview of a user's access inside the organization. Although maintaining IdentityIQ upgrades can be difficult, SailPoint's total advantages exceed this disadvantage.
Provides visibility into user access across the company, enhances control over admin access, and resolves JML issues
Managing upgrades for IdentityIQ is challenging
IBM QRadar serves as a valuable SIEM tool that enhances the portfolio of offerings, especially when used alongside MDR services. It provides valuable insights into the latest cyber threats and offers various log types for the monitoring team, benefiting the overall security and threat detection capabilities.
The integration of threat intelligence feeds with QRadar is outstanding, providing valuable and insightful information. Additionally, the graphical user interface (GUI) of the tool is impressive and well-designed, catering to the needs of analysts.
One drawback of QRadar is its high license cost, which can be expensive for organizations. Additionally, customization requests and configuring specific use cases incur additional charges. Another aspect that could be improved is the response time of the support team, as they tend to take longer to address queries or issues.
SailPoint is an innovative business with a top-notch staff that creates tools to address difficult identity and access management problems. The advantages of SailPoint, such as centralized access reviews, automation of new hiring and terminations, and insights into role-based access control, make the effort to implement it worthwhile.
Centralized access, great customer employees and valuable insights
Requires a shift in thinking for software investments and exposes challenges
QRadar effectively addresses the need to monitor, investigate, detect, and respond to threats on devices and endpoints within the environment. Its logs retention capability is commendable, and it efficiently collates and analyzes large amounts of data from both cloud and on-site sources, providing valuable insights for security operations.
One of the best aspects of QRadar is its ability to assist in threat detection and response, providing a comprehensive solution for remediating threats. Its open architecture allows for deployment on various platforms, including on-premises, cloud, or as a service. The integration capabilities with EDR, SIEM, SOAR, and other threat intelligence tools enable a unified and comprehensive XDR approach.
There are a few areas that could be improved. The EPS cap, which limits the number of logs that can be integrated into QRadar, can sometimes result in generating false positives. Additionally, the user-friendliness of the platform could be enhanced, especially in terms of setting rules, which can be a bit challenging.
IBM QRadar serves as a valuable SIEM tool that enhances the portfolio of offerings, especially when used alongside MDR services. It provides valuable insights into the latest cyber threats and offers various log types for the monitoring team, benefiting the overall security and threat detection capabilities.
The integration of threat intelligence feeds with QRadar is outstanding, providing valuable and insightful information. Additionally, the graphical user interface (GUI) of the tool is impressive and well-designed, catering to the needs of analysts.
One drawback of QRadar is its high license cost, which can be expensive for organizations. Additionally, customization requests and configuring specific use cases incur additional charges. Another aspect that could be improved is the response time of the support team, as they tend to take longer to address queries or issues.
I value its capacity to automate certification procedures, life cycle events, and to offer a thorough overview of a user's access inside the organization. Although maintaining IdentityIQ upgrades can be difficult, SailPoint's total advantages exceed this disadvantage.
Provides visibility into user access across the company, enhances control over admin access, and resolves JML issues
Managing upgrades for IdentityIQ is challenging
SailPoint is an innovative business with a top-notch staff that creates tools to address difficult identity and access management problems. The advantages of SailPoint, such as centralized access reviews, automation of new hiring and terminations, and insights into role-based access control, make the effort to implement it worthwhile.
Centralized access, great customer employees and valuable insights
Requires a shift in thinking for software investments and exposes challenges
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of QRadar SIEM vs. SailPoint, SailPoint has 18 user reviews and QRadar SIEM has 26. The average star rating for SailPoint is 4.27 while QRadar SIEM has an average rating of 4.15. SailPoint has more positive reviews than QRadar SIEM. Comparing QRadar SIEM vs. SailPoint reviews, SailPoint has stronger overall reviews.
QRadar SIEM vs. SailPoint both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Reporting & Analytics, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Password Management, Device Management, Disaster Recovery, Reminders/Alerts, Workflow Automation, Systems/Administrative, Configuration Management, Integration Options, Supported Technologies, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of QRadar SIEM vs. SailPoint, QRadar SIEM offers more of the most popular features and tools than SailPoint.
In our pricing comparison of QRadar SIEM vs. SailPoint, SailPoint's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to SailPoint's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of QRadar SIEM vs. SailPoint shows that QRadar SIEM scores higher in usability for setup & support, quality of support, ease of admin. SailPoint scores higher in ease of use, meets requirements, learning curve, but QRadar SIEM has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
