In our comparison of QRadar SIEM vs. Reciprocity, QRadar SIEM is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
QRadar effectively addresses the need to monitor, investigate, detect, and respond to threats on devices and endpoints within the environment. Its logs retention capability is commendable, and it efficiently collates and analyzes large amounts of data from both cloud and on-site sources, providing valuable insights for security operations.
One of the best aspects of QRadar is its ability to assist in threat detection and response, providing a comprehensive solution for remediating threats. Its open architecture allows for deployment on various platforms, including on-premises, cloud, or as a service. The integration capabilities with EDR, SIEM, SOAR, and other threat intelligence tools enable a unified and comprehensive XDR approach.
There are a few areas that could be improved. The EPS cap, which limits the number of logs that can be integrated into QRadar, can sometimes result in generating false positives. Additionally, the user-friendliness of the platform could be enhanced, especially in terms of setting rules, which can be a bit challenging.
Reciprocity ROAR Platform is a fantastic tool to handle various GRC initiatives, supporting widely-used risk management frameworks, and offering the essential elements and functionality for effectively overseeing tricky compliance initiatives. Although HITRUST can be set up and maintained within the platform, one disadvantage is that it is not an outside the box framework.
Flexible, and easy to use
Not very unique
IBM QRadar serves as a valuable SIEM tool that enhances the portfolio of offerings, especially when used alongside MDR services. It provides valuable insights into the latest cyber threats and offers various log types for the monitoring team, benefiting the overall security and threat detection capabilities.
The integration of threat intelligence feeds with QRadar is outstanding, providing valuable and insightful information. Additionally, the graphical user interface (GUI) of the tool is impressive and well-designed, catering to the needs of analysts.
One drawback of QRadar is its high license cost, which can be expensive for organizations. Additionally, customization requests and configuring specific use cases incur additional charges. Another aspect that could be improved is the response time of the support team, as they tend to take longer to address queries or issues.
The RiskOptics ROAR Platform is my favorite because it is simple and fast to use. We had a pressing requirement and the RiskOptics team was able to get us up and run within a week. In comparison, other technologies may take months to yield any useful results. It has been a pleasure to work with a company that is open-minded and genuinely cares about the success of its customers, and the team has also been incredibly accommodating and helpful.
Easy to use, efficient and supportive team
None
QRadar effectively addresses the need to monitor, investigate, detect, and respond to threats on devices and endpoints within the environment. Its logs retention capability is commendable, and it efficiently collates and analyzes large amounts of data from both cloud and on-site sources, providing valuable insights for security operations.
One of the best aspects of QRadar is its ability to assist in threat detection and response, providing a comprehensive solution for remediating threats. Its open architecture allows for deployment on various platforms, including on-premises, cloud, or as a service. The integration capabilities with EDR, SIEM, SOAR, and other threat intelligence tools enable a unified and comprehensive XDR approach.
There are a few areas that could be improved. The EPS cap, which limits the number of logs that can be integrated into QRadar, can sometimes result in generating false positives. Additionally, the user-friendliness of the platform could be enhanced, especially in terms of setting rules, which can be a bit challenging.
IBM QRadar serves as a valuable SIEM tool that enhances the portfolio of offerings, especially when used alongside MDR services. It provides valuable insights into the latest cyber threats and offers various log types for the monitoring team, benefiting the overall security and threat detection capabilities.
The integration of threat intelligence feeds with QRadar is outstanding, providing valuable and insightful information. Additionally, the graphical user interface (GUI) of the tool is impressive and well-designed, catering to the needs of analysts.
One drawback of QRadar is its high license cost, which can be expensive for organizations. Additionally, customization requests and configuring specific use cases incur additional charges. Another aspect that could be improved is the response time of the support team, as they tend to take longer to address queries or issues.
Reciprocity ROAR Platform is a fantastic tool to handle various GRC initiatives, supporting widely-used risk management frameworks, and offering the essential elements and functionality for effectively overseeing tricky compliance initiatives. Although HITRUST can be set up and maintained within the platform, one disadvantage is that it is not an outside the box framework.
Flexible, and easy to use
Not very unique
The RiskOptics ROAR Platform is my favorite because it is simple and fast to use. We had a pressing requirement and the RiskOptics team was able to get us up and run within a week. In comparison, other technologies may take months to yield any useful results. It has been a pleasure to work with a company that is open-minded and genuinely cares about the success of its customers, and the team has also been incredibly accommodating and helpful.
Easy to use, efficient and supportive team
None
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of QRadar SIEM vs. Reciprocity, Reciprocity has 2 user reviews and QRadar SIEM has 26. The average star rating for Reciprocity is 5 while QRadar SIEM has an average rating of 4.15. Reciprocity has more positive reviews than QRadar SIEM. Comparing QRadar SIEM vs. Reciprocity reviews, Reciprocity has stronger overall reviews.
QRadar SIEM vs. Reciprocity both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Reporting & Analytics, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Password Management, Disaster Recovery, Device Management, Reminders/Alerts, Workflow Automation, Systems/Administrative, Configuration Management, Integration Options, Supported Technologies, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of QRadar SIEM vs. Reciprocity, QRadar SIEM offers more of the most popular features and tools than Reciprocity.
In our pricing comparison of QRadar SIEM vs. Reciprocity, Reciprocity's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to Reciprocity's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of QRadar SIEM vs. Reciprocity shows that Reciprocity scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements. QRadar SIEM scores higher in setup & support, quality of support, ease of admin, but Reciprocity has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
