In our comparison of AdaptiveWork vs. Jira, Jira is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
plenty of functionality and features, customizing PM workflows is possible in many ways, has a few agile and all choices for waterfall projects management.
Agile features, especially the Kanban board, could be better
JIRA is great for bug tracking, managing hours, and sprints in a user-friendly way
I think it would be beneficial to have an email notification option when a task is assigned or changed for a user
User-friendly, customizable to many-use scenarios, web access, and scaling is simple as our corporation and departments evolve.
Functions poorly with detailed project plans, pushing the dates of a project out or changing a plan is hard if there are very many activities.
A really helpful tool to manage our internal approvals. To track the status, complete cross border approvals, reduce manual work, minimize the time, and manage a huge volume of approvals by the stakeholders is amazing.
It is a web-based program that can be accessed from anywhere in the world. Both versions work in the best manner. It offers various options like assigning to different users, obtaining their comments, attaching supporting documents, printing the ticket, reports, and dashboards which can be customized by the users, option to download, link the ticket with other tickets, etc. We can create various workflows as per the requirements of the users. The email alerts, reminder emails, option to close the ticket, clone the ticket, revoke the ticket, customizing the reports and dashboards is great.
The graphical reports can’t be generated easily. The note which is created allows only text inputs. It does not allow for the creation of a table or column. The ticket can not be generated from the reports automatically. Also, it takes so much time for loading the contents.
plenty of functionality and features, customizing PM workflows is possible in many ways, has a few agile and all choices for waterfall projects management.
Agile features, especially the Kanban board, could be better
User-friendly, customizable to many-use scenarios, web access, and scaling is simple as our corporation and departments evolve.
Functions poorly with detailed project plans, pushing the dates of a project out or changing a plan is hard if there are very many activities.
JIRA is great for bug tracking, managing hours, and sprints in a user-friendly way
I think it would be beneficial to have an email notification option when a task is assigned or changed for a user
A really helpful tool to manage our internal approvals. To track the status, complete cross border approvals, reduce manual work, minimize the time, and manage a huge volume of approvals by the stakeholders is amazing.
It is a web-based program that can be accessed from anywhere in the world. Both versions work in the best manner. It offers various options like assigning to different users, obtaining their comments, attaching supporting documents, printing the ticket, reports, and dashboards which can be customized by the users, option to download, link the ticket with other tickets, etc. We can create various workflows as per the requirements of the users. The email alerts, reminder emails, option to close the ticket, clone the ticket, revoke the ticket, customizing the reports and dashboards is great.
The graphical reports can’t be generated easily. The note which is created allows only text inputs. It does not allow for the creation of a table or column. The ticket can not be generated from the reports automatically. Also, it takes so much time for loading the contents.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of AdaptiveWork vs. Jira, Jira has 148 user reviews and AdaptiveWork has 42. The average star rating for Jira is 4.42 while AdaptiveWork has an average rating of 4.35. Jira has more positive reviews than AdaptiveWork. Comparing AdaptiveWork vs. Jira reviews, Jira has stronger overall reviews.
AdaptiveWork vs. Jira both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Project Management Features, Task Management, Resource Management, Project Management Methodology, Customizable Items, Drag-and-Drop Builders/Designers, Layout Types, Reporting & Analytics, Systems/Administrative, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Password Management, Cybersecurity Features, Third-Party Integrations, After-Sales Service, Limits. In our feature comparison of AdaptiveWork vs. Jira, Jira offers more of the most popular features and tools than AdaptiveWork.
In our pricing comparison of AdaptiveWork vs. Jira, Jira's pricing starts at Free/month and is more affordable compared to Jira's starting cost of Free/month.
Our comparison of AdaptiveWork vs. Jira shows that AdaptiveWork scores higher in usability for ease of use, learning curve, setup & support. Jira scores higher in meets requirements, quality of support, ease of admin, but AdaptiveWork has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
