In our comparison of OneTrust vs. SecurityScorecard, SecurityScorecard is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
The product prioritizes cloud-based operations and allows for customization to meet specific needs.
The product addresses consent and preference management in accordance with compliance regulations such as GDPR, which includes the right to be forgotten
Although the interface is satisfactory, there is room for improvement
Companies can access real-time security scores from Security Scorecard, which is routinely updated to reflect changes to their networks and apps. Customers that wish to initiate discussions about their security posture and buy additional services will find this useful. However, for new businesses, the first discovery phase can last up to 7 days, so a 24-hour-earlier report would be advantageous.
Real-time scoring from multiple sources and score is updated over time to track changes in security posture
Initial discovery can take up to 7 days for new companies, and 24-hour earlier reports would be a useful feature
The software offers a sensible, well-informed, and cogent strategy for obtaining and upholding compliance with norms like ISO 27001. It drastically reduces the amount of time and work required to structure and achieve the standard. The reporting and dashboards should still be improved, and the automation is good but not yet amazing.
Time saving, solves the problem of automating the compliance process for ISO 27001 and great compliance management
Automation and reporting could improve
Clear and concise security metrics are provided by this software, making it simple for senior management to understand and implement low-hanging security adjustments. Despite the possibility of some false positives as a result of shared cloud resources, the product offers a quick and efficient way to identify security issues and spur change.
Easy to understand, and allows you to push for security changes
False positives
The product prioritizes cloud-based operations and allows for customization to meet specific needs.
The product addresses consent and preference management in accordance with compliance regulations such as GDPR, which includes the right to be forgotten
Although the interface is satisfactory, there is room for improvement
The software offers a sensible, well-informed, and cogent strategy for obtaining and upholding compliance with norms like ISO 27001. It drastically reduces the amount of time and work required to structure and achieve the standard. The reporting and dashboards should still be improved, and the automation is good but not yet amazing.
Time saving, solves the problem of automating the compliance process for ISO 27001 and great compliance management
Automation and reporting could improve
Companies can access real-time security scores from Security Scorecard, which is routinely updated to reflect changes to their networks and apps. Customers that wish to initiate discussions about their security posture and buy additional services will find this useful. However, for new businesses, the first discovery phase can last up to 7 days, so a 24-hour-earlier report would be advantageous.
Real-time scoring from multiple sources and score is updated over time to track changes in security posture
Initial discovery can take up to 7 days for new companies, and 24-hour earlier reports would be a useful feature
Clear and concise security metrics are provided by this software, making it simple for senior management to understand and implement low-hanging security adjustments. Despite the possibility of some false positives as a result of shared cloud resources, the product offers a quick and efficient way to identify security issues and spur change.
Easy to understand, and allows you to push for security changes
False positives
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of OneTrust vs. SecurityScorecard, OneTrust has 12 user reviews and SecurityScorecard has 18. The average star rating for OneTrust is 4.08 while SecurityScorecard has an average rating of 4.05. OneTrust has more positive reviews than SecurityScorecard. Comparing OneTrust vs. SecurityScorecard reviews, OneTrust has stronger overall reviews.
OneTrust vs. SecurityScorecard both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Reporting & Analytics, Risk Management, Systems/Administrative, Reminders/Alerts, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Cloud Management, Customizable Items, Integration Options, Language & Speech, After-Sales Service, Business Units/Areas Covered. In our feature comparison of OneTrust vs. SecurityScorecard, SecurityScorecard offers more of the most popular features and tools than OneTrust.
In our pricing comparison of OneTrust vs. SecurityScorecard, SecurityScorecard's pricing starts at Free/month and is more affordable compared to SecurityScorecard's starting cost of Free/month.
Our comparison of OneTrust vs. SecurityScorecard shows that SecurityScorecard scores higher in usability for learning curve, setup & support, quality of support, ease of admin. OneTrust scores higher in ease of use, meets requirements, but SecurityScorecard has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
