In our comparison of Nucleus vs. OmniNet, Nucleus is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
The product effectively helps me identify vulnerabilities and issues in applications and infrastructure. By providing solutions, it enables me to address these vulnerabilities and improve the security posture of our systems. The comprehensive tracking capabilities assist in proactively managing cyber risks.
I appreciate the multiple tracking options available in the product, including assets, compliance, vulnerabilities, risk factors, active vulnerabilities, top risks, and trends. These features allow me to stay on top of my application and infrastructure vulnerabilities effectively, supporting my role as a cyber ninja.
One drawback I've encountered is the inconvenience of filters. It would be beneficial to have a way to save filters for future use, as this would enhance efficiency and ease of use.
N/A
The product provides observability and a centralized view of vulnerabilities across assets. The dashboard, equipped with numerous out-of-the-box filters, enables quick report generation and insights into all assets. The risk score feature is particularly helpful in prioritizing workloads.
I appreciate the vulnerability overview with different classifications and the ability to filter by environment and project. The interface is user-friendly, requiring minimal training. The template section is helpful for understanding different vulnerabilities and the CWSS score. Additionally, the ease of downloading asset lists in various formats and the centralized view of vulnerabilities and compliance are valuable features. The integration with SSO adds convenience.
While the documentation is good, providing university/academy classes to learn how to use the tool, especially for customization of reports and integration with enterprise tools, would be beneficial. Some minor enhancements to the preference section, such as retaining filters and scope, would also improve the user experience.
N/A
The product effectively helps me identify vulnerabilities and issues in applications and infrastructure. By providing solutions, it enables me to address these vulnerabilities and improve the security posture of our systems. The comprehensive tracking capabilities assist in proactively managing cyber risks.
I appreciate the multiple tracking options available in the product, including assets, compliance, vulnerabilities, risk factors, active vulnerabilities, top risks, and trends. These features allow me to stay on top of my application and infrastructure vulnerabilities effectively, supporting my role as a cyber ninja.
One drawback I've encountered is the inconvenience of filters. It would be beneficial to have a way to save filters for future use, as this would enhance efficiency and ease of use.
The product provides observability and a centralized view of vulnerabilities across assets. The dashboard, equipped with numerous out-of-the-box filters, enables quick report generation and insights into all assets. The risk score feature is particularly helpful in prioritizing workloads.
I appreciate the vulnerability overview with different classifications and the ability to filter by environment and project. The interface is user-friendly, requiring minimal training. The template section is helpful for understanding different vulnerabilities and the CWSS score. Additionally, the ease of downloading asset lists in various formats and the centralized view of vulnerabilities and compliance are valuable features. The integration with SSO adds convenience.
While the documentation is good, providing university/academy classes to learn how to use the tool, especially for customization of reports and integration with enterprise tools, would be beneficial. Some minor enhancements to the preference section, such as retaining filters and scope, would also improve the user experience.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Nucleus vs. OmniNet, Nucleus has 17 user reviews and OmniNet has 0. The average star rating for Nucleus is 4.29 while OmniNet has an average rating of 0.0. Nucleus has more positive reviews than OmniNet. Comparing Nucleus vs. OmniNet reviews, Nucleus has stronger overall reviews.
Nucleus vs. OmniNet both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Reporting & Analytics, Governance, Risk, & Compliance (GRC), Reminders/Alerts, Systems/Administrative, Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC) Integrations, Integration Options, Third-Party Integrations, Microsoft 365, Cisco. In our feature comparison of Nucleus vs. OmniNet, Nucleus offers more of the most popular features and tools than OmniNet.
In our pricing comparison of Nucleus vs. OmniNet, OmniNet's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to OmniNet's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of Nucleus vs. OmniNet shows that Nucleus scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, learning curve, ease of admin. OmniNet scores higher in , but Nucleus has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
