In our comparison of ThreatConnect vs. Trellix, ThreatConnect is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
For a small team, ThreatConnect proved effective in scaling and managing enterprise threat intelligence and threat hunting capabilities. However, as the complexity of Playbook design and integration increased, the software's potential was hindered, preventing the team from fully maximizing its benefits.
ThreatConnect offered the ability to gather, analyze, enhance, and distribute various types of data related to cybersecurity incidents and indicators of compromise across different customer environments. It allowed for tasks such as uploading a domain name, checking it against threat feeds, and enriching the data with additional information like news articles, reports, attribution, and determining the domain's prevalence across multiple client setups.
One of the drawbacks we encountered was the confusion and lack of proper documentation regarding the Playbooks that facilitated enrichment and integration with third-party tools like SIEM. The visual representation of coding concepts, where blocks were connected to one another, was intended to assist non-programmers in developing their capabilities. In reality, a more code-centric approach to Playbook development would have been more beneficial. We found ourselves with numerous questions and minimal guidance on how to address simple problems that could be easily tackled using Python.
For a complete security package for the entire company from all threats from any possible direction, this is a great protection tool.
There is protection for all actions over the Internet or even the internal network that connects different machines. It protects the individual machine from all threats from emails, files, other computers, hackers and websites, etc. It also protects the entire network from all ends, internally and external threats as well. It is complete, updated and works seamlessly in the background. It is easy to manage despite being such a comprehensive product. In short, it is one of the best, if not the best security options that are out there.
It is expensive, but then it is really a solution for an enterprise. Some files and software require special permission to open and use, which can be annoying, but a price for protection. The system slows down, and the PCs especially do experience a slower relaunch time.
Consider this risk management system that offers numerous possibilities for effortless detection of high-risk threats and a platform for record-keeping.
It is convenient for any company to efficiently prioritize potential high-risk issues. Additionally, it simplifies record maintenance, and ThreatConnect facilitates easy threat detection through actionable analysis.
There were no significant issues encountered during the implementation of ThreatConnect, and it even facilitated learning about the tools.
A cost-effective, simple and flexible app.
I don’t like auto re-start and pop-ups.
For a small team, ThreatConnect proved effective in scaling and managing enterprise threat intelligence and threat hunting capabilities. However, as the complexity of Playbook design and integration increased, the software's potential was hindered, preventing the team from fully maximizing its benefits.
ThreatConnect offered the ability to gather, analyze, enhance, and distribute various types of data related to cybersecurity incidents and indicators of compromise across different customer environments. It allowed for tasks such as uploading a domain name, checking it against threat feeds, and enriching the data with additional information like news articles, reports, attribution, and determining the domain's prevalence across multiple client setups.
One of the drawbacks we encountered was the confusion and lack of proper documentation regarding the Playbooks that facilitated enrichment and integration with third-party tools like SIEM. The visual representation of coding concepts, where blocks were connected to one another, was intended to assist non-programmers in developing their capabilities. In reality, a more code-centric approach to Playbook development would have been more beneficial. We found ourselves with numerous questions and minimal guidance on how to address simple problems that could be easily tackled using Python.
Consider this risk management system that offers numerous possibilities for effortless detection of high-risk threats and a platform for record-keeping.
It is convenient for any company to efficiently prioritize potential high-risk issues. Additionally, it simplifies record maintenance, and ThreatConnect facilitates easy threat detection through actionable analysis.
There were no significant issues encountered during the implementation of ThreatConnect, and it even facilitated learning about the tools.
For a complete security package for the entire company from all threats from any possible direction, this is a great protection tool.
There is protection for all actions over the Internet or even the internal network that connects different machines. It protects the individual machine from all threats from emails, files, other computers, hackers and websites, etc. It also protects the entire network from all ends, internally and external threats as well. It is complete, updated and works seamlessly in the background. It is easy to manage despite being such a comprehensive product. In short, it is one of the best, if not the best security options that are out there.
It is expensive, but then it is really a solution for an enterprise. Some files and software require special permission to open and use, which can be annoying, but a price for protection. The system slows down, and the PCs especially do experience a slower relaunch time.
A cost-effective, simple and flexible app.
I don’t like auto re-start and pop-ups.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of ThreatConnect vs. Trellix, Trellix has 28 user reviews and ThreatConnect has 2. The average star rating for Trellix is 4.32 while ThreatConnect has an average rating of 3.5. Trellix has more positive reviews than ThreatConnect. Comparing ThreatConnect vs. Trellix reviews, Trellix has stronger overall reviews.
ThreatConnect vs. Trellix both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Reporting & Analytics, Reminders/Alerts, Systems/Administrative, Risk Management, Workflow Automation, Drag-and-Drop Builders/Designers, Collaboration Tools, Report Management, Customizable Items, Integration Options, Compliance Accreditations, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of ThreatConnect vs. Trellix, ThreatConnect offers more of the most popular features and tools than Trellix.
In our pricing comparison of ThreatConnect vs. Trellix, Trellix's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to Trellix's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of ThreatConnect vs. Trellix shows that ThreatConnect scores higher in usability for ease of use, learning curve, ease of admin. Trellix scores higher in meets requirements, setup & support, quality of support, but ThreatConnect has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
