In our comparison of Keysight vs. QRadar SIEM, QRadar SIEM is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
With a single view of all accounts and free trial information, Keysight Network Test is an excellent tool for managing multiple accounts. It also offers an overview of each account's past purchases and the ability to prioritize accounts. It also includes Looker for data on product usage. The most annoying thing, though, is that I have to log back in every day.
All-in-one accounts dashboard, free trials are very functional, access to usage statistics, third-party integration
Daily login required
QRadar effectively addresses the need to monitor, investigate, detect, and respond to threats on devices and endpoints within the environment. Its logs retention capability is commendable, and it efficiently collates and analyzes large amounts of data from both cloud and on-site sources, providing valuable insights for security operations.
One of the best aspects of QRadar is its ability to assist in threat detection and response, providing a comprehensive solution for remediating threats. Its open architecture allows for deployment on various platforms, including on-premises, cloud, or as a service. The integration capabilities with EDR, SIEM, SOAR, and other threat intelligence tools enable a unified and comprehensive XDR approach.
There are a few areas that could be improved. The EPS cap, which limits the number of logs that can be integrated into QRadar, can sometimes result in generating false positives. Additionally, the user-friendliness of the platform could be enhanced, especially in terms of setting rules, which can be a bit challenging.
The Keysight Network Test is an effective tool that I use to monitor consumption, target renewals, and find upsell opportunities. It is simple to use and offers insightful data on usage trends. But the tool could need more AI-powered functionality, and the user interface could be updated. All things considered, Keysight Network Test is an invaluable tool for any company looking to boost sales and marketing.
Easy to use, analysis of usage history, domain tracking, new sign-up management and analysis
Lacks AI-based features, interface looks basic, limited third-party integration
IBM QRadar serves as a valuable SIEM tool that enhances the portfolio of offerings, especially when used alongside MDR services. It provides valuable insights into the latest cyber threats and offers various log types for the monitoring team, benefiting the overall security and threat detection capabilities.
The integration of threat intelligence feeds with QRadar is outstanding, providing valuable and insightful information. Additionally, the graphical user interface (GUI) of the tool is impressive and well-designed, catering to the needs of analysts.
One drawback of QRadar is its high license cost, which can be expensive for organizations. Additionally, customization requests and configuring specific use cases incur additional charges. Another aspect that could be improved is the response time of the support team, as they tend to take longer to address queries or issues.
With a single view of all accounts and free trial information, Keysight Network Test is an excellent tool for managing multiple accounts. It also offers an overview of each account's past purchases and the ability to prioritize accounts. It also includes Looker for data on product usage. The most annoying thing, though, is that I have to log back in every day.
All-in-one accounts dashboard, free trials are very functional, access to usage statistics, third-party integration
Daily login required
The Keysight Network Test is an effective tool that I use to monitor consumption, target renewals, and find upsell opportunities. It is simple to use and offers insightful data on usage trends. But the tool could need more AI-powered functionality, and the user interface could be updated. All things considered, Keysight Network Test is an invaluable tool for any company looking to boost sales and marketing.
Easy to use, analysis of usage history, domain tracking, new sign-up management and analysis
Lacks AI-based features, interface looks basic, limited third-party integration
QRadar effectively addresses the need to monitor, investigate, detect, and respond to threats on devices and endpoints within the environment. Its logs retention capability is commendable, and it efficiently collates and analyzes large amounts of data from both cloud and on-site sources, providing valuable insights for security operations.
One of the best aspects of QRadar is its ability to assist in threat detection and response, providing a comprehensive solution for remediating threats. Its open architecture allows for deployment on various platforms, including on-premises, cloud, or as a service. The integration capabilities with EDR, SIEM, SOAR, and other threat intelligence tools enable a unified and comprehensive XDR approach.
There are a few areas that could be improved. The EPS cap, which limits the number of logs that can be integrated into QRadar, can sometimes result in generating false positives. Additionally, the user-friendliness of the platform could be enhanced, especially in terms of setting rules, which can be a bit challenging.
IBM QRadar serves as a valuable SIEM tool that enhances the portfolio of offerings, especially when used alongside MDR services. It provides valuable insights into the latest cyber threats and offers various log types for the monitoring team, benefiting the overall security and threat detection capabilities.
The integration of threat intelligence feeds with QRadar is outstanding, providing valuable and insightful information. Additionally, the graphical user interface (GUI) of the tool is impressive and well-designed, catering to the needs of analysts.
One drawback of QRadar is its high license cost, which can be expensive for organizations. Additionally, customization requests and configuring specific use cases incur additional charges. Another aspect that could be improved is the response time of the support team, as they tend to take longer to address queries or issues.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Keysight vs. QRadar SIEM, Keysight has 3 user reviews and QRadar SIEM has 26. The average star rating for Keysight is 4.33 while QRadar SIEM has an average rating of 4.15. Keysight has more positive reviews than QRadar SIEM. Comparing Keysight vs. QRadar SIEM reviews, Keysight has stronger overall reviews.
Keysight vs. QRadar SIEM both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Reporting & Analytics, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Password Management, Disaster Recovery, Device Management, Reminders/Alerts, Workflow Automation, Systems/Administrative, Configuration Management, Integration Options, Supported Technologies, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of Keysight vs. QRadar SIEM, QRadar SIEM offers more of the most popular features and tools than Keysight.
In our pricing comparison of Keysight vs. QRadar SIEM, QRadar SIEM's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to QRadar SIEM's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of Keysight vs. QRadar SIEM shows that QRadar SIEM scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, quality of support, ease of admin. Keysight scores higher in learning curve, setup & support, but QRadar SIEM has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
