In our comparison of Juniper Networks vs. Keeper, Juniper Networks is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
Juniper routers highlights their impressive size and visual design, scalability, integration, reliability, and the extensive features they offer. Although their syntax may be a bit complicated and they require careful handling, Juniper routers are an excellent choice for enterprise networks. They solve various problems by catering to both enterprises and non-commercial solutions, providing aggregated and integrated services, offering a secure Linux-based system, supporting diverse applications, and streamlining operations through automation. In conclusion, I highly recommend Juniper routers for anyone seeking a reliable and powerful networking solution.
I really appreciate the size and visual design of the Juniper routers. They have a sleek and appealing appearance. Additionally, the routers are scalable, integrated, and reliable, which is a major advantage. When it comes to Enterprise Networks, Juniper routers are an excellent choice. They offer a good range of features that cater to the needs of enterprise-level networks. Moreover, the Junos operating system is impressive and provides a seamless user experience.
I find the syntax of Juniper routers a bit complicated compared to other vendors. It may require some additional effort to get familiar with the syntax. Another aspect to consider is that Juniper routers are more sensitive, so they need to be handled with care. Proper precautions should be taken to ensure their longevity and performance.
Allows us to share credentials with users assigned to Okta and other SSO systems quickly and easily. Users and teams can easily share credentials, and admins can add new ones. Logging in through SAML is quick and easy, and provisioning is automated using SCIM, which saves time and streamlines the process.
Keeper's easy-to-use and easy-to-administer features solved some problems for us. Account provisioning is also straightforward, and there's no need to spin up additional server instances to manage logins or provision coworkers. We first used Keeper during the early phase of their latest SSO cloud rollout and experienced some difficulties, but admins added features and were highly responsive.
Users are unable to share forms related to identity and payments.
Juniper Mist Wireless has been a tremendous help to us in resolving wireless issues and addressing common WiFi problems. The Mist AL solution has significantly improved the efficiency of our wireless devices and expanded WiFi coverage.
One of the aspects I appreciate the most about Juniper is their range of products, including SRX, MX, QFX, and EX series, all running on JUNOS OS. The config rollback feature has proven to be invaluable for network engineers and administrators. Additionally, working with JUNOS is remarkably convenient and straightforward, thanks to the set command, which simplifies network configuration.
While Juniper's network products are highly effective, some of them can be on the pricier side compared to the value they provide.
Allows us to share credentials with users assigned to Okta and other SSO systems quickly and easily. Users and teams can easily share credentials, and admins can add new ones. Logging in through SAML is quick and easy, and provisioning is automated using SCIM, which saves time and streamlines the process.
Keeper's easy-to-use and easy-to-administer features solved some problems for us. Account provisioning is also straightforward, and there's no need to spin up additional server instances to manage logins or provision coworkers. We first used Keeper during the early phase of their latest SSO cloud rollout and experienced some difficulties, but admins added features and were highly responsive.
Users are unable to share forms related to identity and payments.
Juniper routers highlights their impressive size and visual design, scalability, integration, reliability, and the extensive features they offer. Although their syntax may be a bit complicated and they require careful handling, Juniper routers are an excellent choice for enterprise networks. They solve various problems by catering to both enterprises and non-commercial solutions, providing aggregated and integrated services, offering a secure Linux-based system, supporting diverse applications, and streamlining operations through automation. In conclusion, I highly recommend Juniper routers for anyone seeking a reliable and powerful networking solution.
I really appreciate the size and visual design of the Juniper routers. They have a sleek and appealing appearance. Additionally, the routers are scalable, integrated, and reliable, which is a major advantage. When it comes to Enterprise Networks, Juniper routers are an excellent choice. They offer a good range of features that cater to the needs of enterprise-level networks. Moreover, the Junos operating system is impressive and provides a seamless user experience.
I find the syntax of Juniper routers a bit complicated compared to other vendors. It may require some additional effort to get familiar with the syntax. Another aspect to consider is that Juniper routers are more sensitive, so they need to be handled with care. Proper precautions should be taken to ensure their longevity and performance.
Juniper Mist Wireless has been a tremendous help to us in resolving wireless issues and addressing common WiFi problems. The Mist AL solution has significantly improved the efficiency of our wireless devices and expanded WiFi coverage.
One of the aspects I appreciate the most about Juniper is their range of products, including SRX, MX, QFX, and EX series, all running on JUNOS OS. The config rollback feature has proven to be invaluable for network engineers and administrators. Additionally, working with JUNOS is remarkably convenient and straightforward, thanks to the set command, which simplifies network configuration.
While Juniper's network products are highly effective, some of them can be on the pricier side compared to the value they provide.
Allows us to share credentials with users assigned to Okta and other SSO systems quickly and easily. Users and teams can easily share credentials, and admins can add new ones. Logging in through SAML is quick and easy, and provisioning is automated using SCIM, which saves time and streamlines the process.
Keeper's easy-to-use and easy-to-administer features solved some problems for us. Account provisioning is also straightforward, and there's no need to spin up additional server instances to manage logins or provision coworkers. We first used Keeper during the early phase of their latest SSO cloud rollout and experienced some difficulties, but admins added features and were highly responsive.
Users are unable to share forms related to identity and payments.
Allows us to share credentials with users assigned to Okta and other SSO systems quickly and easily. Users and teams can easily share credentials, and admins can add new ones. Logging in through SAML is quick and easy, and provisioning is automated using SCIM, which saves time and streamlines the process.
Keeper's easy-to-use and easy-to-administer features solved some problems for us. Account provisioning is also straightforward, and there's no need to spin up additional server instances to manage logins or provision coworkers. We first used Keeper during the early phase of their latest SSO cloud rollout and experienced some difficulties, but admins added features and were highly responsive.
Users are unable to share forms related to identity and payments.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Juniper Networks vs. Keeper, Keeper has 3 user reviews and Juniper Networks has 7. The average star rating for Keeper is 4.66 while Juniper Networks has an average rating of 4.28. Keeper has more positive reviews than Juniper Networks. Comparing Juniper Networks vs. Keeper reviews, Keeper has stronger overall reviews.
Juniper Networks vs. Keeper both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Reporting & Analytics, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Third-Party Integrations, Device Management, Network Management, Application Management, Systems/Administrative, Sync/Refresh. In our feature comparison of Juniper Networks vs. Keeper, Juniper Networks offers more of the most popular features and tools than Keeper.
In our pricing comparison of Juniper Networks vs. Keeper, Keeper's pricing starts at $24/month and is more affordable compared to Keeper's starting cost of $24/month.
Our comparison of Juniper Networks vs. Keeper shows that Juniper Networks scores higher in usability for ease of use. Keeper scores higher in meets requirements, ease of admin, but Juniper Networks has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
