In our comparison of Jira vs. Targetprocess, Targetprocess is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
JIRA is great for bug tracking, managing hours, and sprints in a user-friendly way
I think it would be beneficial to have an email notification option when a task is assigned or changed for a user
We’re able to monitor the mistakes viewed on our websites and pages using TargetProcess.
The update is fairly irregular.
Using it is extremely simple, it has pleasant and exceptional graphics for all users, a very quick and organized manner to move cards regarding our work procedures, and using Target Process, we’re able to easily create, edit and allocate cards.
A really helpful tool to manage our internal approvals. To track the status, complete cross border approvals, reduce manual work, minimize the time, and manage a huge volume of approvals by the stakeholders is amazing.
It is a web-based program that can be accessed from anywhere in the world. Both versions work in the best manner. It offers various options like assigning to different users, obtaining their comments, attaching supporting documents, printing the ticket, reports, and dashboards which can be customized by the users, option to download, link the ticket with other tickets, etc. We can create various workflows as per the requirements of the users. The email alerts, reminder emails, option to close the ticket, clone the ticket, revoke the ticket, customizing the reports and dashboards is great.
The graphical reports can’t be generated easily. The note which is created allows only text inputs. It does not allow for the creation of a table or column. The ticket can not be generated from the reports automatically. Also, it takes so much time for loading the contents.
All our business requirements are supported by TP while practicing a few agile methodologies in our tasks. Its blog is amazing and plays a great role in helping new staff learn the onboard process.
System downtime is extremely rare, its blogs are helpful, the “follow” option on products in TP is good, has adaptable licensing which makes it simple to add/remove team members, the systems DSL used in filters and search is nice, my adaptability with user administration as an admin is great, and it has a natural UI despite being extremely complex.
It is pricey, picking up and installing some reports, graphs, and dashboards is extremely difficult, it is at times slow to paste pictures to descriptions, descriptions on products are sometimes unsteady, and a few incorporations that other systems support is lacking
JIRA is great for bug tracking, managing hours, and sprints in a user-friendly way
I think it would be beneficial to have an email notification option when a task is assigned or changed for a user
A really helpful tool to manage our internal approvals. To track the status, complete cross border approvals, reduce manual work, minimize the time, and manage a huge volume of approvals by the stakeholders is amazing.
It is a web-based program that can be accessed from anywhere in the world. Both versions work in the best manner. It offers various options like assigning to different users, obtaining their comments, attaching supporting documents, printing the ticket, reports, and dashboards which can be customized by the users, option to download, link the ticket with other tickets, etc. We can create various workflows as per the requirements of the users. The email alerts, reminder emails, option to close the ticket, clone the ticket, revoke the ticket, customizing the reports and dashboards is great.
The graphical reports can’t be generated easily. The note which is created allows only text inputs. It does not allow for the creation of a table or column. The ticket can not be generated from the reports automatically. Also, it takes so much time for loading the contents.
We’re able to monitor the mistakes viewed on our websites and pages using TargetProcess.
The update is fairly irregular.
Using it is extremely simple, it has pleasant and exceptional graphics for all users, a very quick and organized manner to move cards regarding our work procedures, and using Target Process, we’re able to easily create, edit and allocate cards.
All our business requirements are supported by TP while practicing a few agile methodologies in our tasks. Its blog is amazing and plays a great role in helping new staff learn the onboard process.
System downtime is extremely rare, its blogs are helpful, the “follow” option on products in TP is good, has adaptable licensing which makes it simple to add/remove team members, the systems DSL used in filters and search is nice, my adaptability with user administration as an admin is great, and it has a natural UI despite being extremely complex.
It is pricey, picking up and installing some reports, graphs, and dashboards is extremely difficult, it is at times slow to paste pictures to descriptions, descriptions on products are sometimes unsteady, and a few incorporations that other systems support is lacking
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Jira vs. Targetprocess, Targetprocess has 135 user reviews and Jira has 148. The average star rating for Targetprocess is 4.58 while Jira has an average rating of 4.42. Targetprocess has more positive reviews than Jira. Comparing Jira vs. Targetprocess reviews, Targetprocess has stronger overall reviews.
Jira vs. Targetprocess both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Project Management Features, Task Management, Project Management Methodology, Layout Types, Reporting & Analytics, Integration Options, Third-Party Integrations, Microsoft 365, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of Jira vs. Targetprocess, Targetprocess offers more of the most popular features and tools than Jira.
In our pricing comparison of Jira vs. Targetprocess, Targetprocess's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to Targetprocess's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of Jira vs. Targetprocess shows that Targetprocess scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, learning curve, quality of support. Jira scores higher in setup & support, ease of admin, but Targetprocess has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
