In our comparison of Infor Birst vs. Looker, Looker is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
This is a very wonderful system. We use it mainly for data modelling, generating reports, etc. and their client support is exceptional. However, despite the many stated cons, they’re mostly experienced by developers.
If the requirements are simple, it is easy to drag and drop reports, support and community are great, has an adaptable and robust BQL, using the API is simple, writing scripts to automate common roles is possible, and methods of processing data are both simple and complicated. Also, a section of the Admin tool has greatly eased troubleshooting reports thanks to the ability to view the BQL and final SQL query making it extremely simple to locate issues.
It’s not possible to copy and paste items. Copying dashboards and implanted reports isn’t possible. A few admin roles can’t work together with one another. For the admin monitors/screens, they work with FLASH. You can’t manage to have wonderful looking reports if you have needs for ADA approved readability as the fonts are small/medium/large and scrollbars, etc. will be on everything…etc.
Ability to develop PDTs, plan looks to be emailed out on a particular frequency, and standardize metrics over the board
It's not possible to do a select distinct on through the explore and it's something you have to perform that on the backend.
A new product that needs to enhance some items
Inexpensive, plenty of features to enhance the time to make the tasks operational, and incredible performance in assembling data, security and probability of learning.
Not so intuitive, no option to paste some data, and as times features don't function as initially advertised.
An astounding ability to save looks to a dashboard to work with every morning. It is a helpful system for presentation and analysis thanks to the custom calculations, data input adaptability, and the quite unlimited creative chances.
The ability to develop precise data groups by saving data “looks” to dashboards that are customized.
Adding computations with data inside the platform is naturally complicated as compared to the data warehouse.
This is a very wonderful system. We use it mainly for data modelling, generating reports, etc. and their client support is exceptional. However, despite the many stated cons, they’re mostly experienced by developers.
If the requirements are simple, it is easy to drag and drop reports, support and community are great, has an adaptable and robust BQL, using the API is simple, writing scripts to automate common roles is possible, and methods of processing data are both simple and complicated. Also, a section of the Admin tool has greatly eased troubleshooting reports thanks to the ability to view the BQL and final SQL query making it extremely simple to locate issues.
It’s not possible to copy and paste items. Copying dashboards and implanted reports isn’t possible. A few admin roles can’t work together with one another. For the admin monitors/screens, they work with FLASH. You can’t manage to have wonderful looking reports if you have needs for ADA approved readability as the fonts are small/medium/large and scrollbars, etc. will be on everything…etc.
A new product that needs to enhance some items
Inexpensive, plenty of features to enhance the time to make the tasks operational, and incredible performance in assembling data, security and probability of learning.
Not so intuitive, no option to paste some data, and as times features don't function as initially advertised.
Ability to develop PDTs, plan looks to be emailed out on a particular frequency, and standardize metrics over the board
It's not possible to do a select distinct on through the explore and it's something you have to perform that on the backend.
An astounding ability to save looks to a dashboard to work with every morning. It is a helpful system for presentation and analysis thanks to the custom calculations, data input adaptability, and the quite unlimited creative chances.
The ability to develop precise data groups by saving data “looks” to dashboards that are customized.
Adding computations with data inside the platform is naturally complicated as compared to the data warehouse.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Infor Birst vs. Looker, Looker has 37 user reviews and Infor Birst has 29. The average star rating for Looker is 4.59 while Infor Birst has an average rating of 4.24. Looker has more positive reviews than Infor Birst. Comparing Infor Birst vs. Looker reviews, Looker has stronger overall reviews.
Infor Birst vs. Looker both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Data Management, Data Migration, Report Management, Reporting & Analytics, Drag-and-Drop Builders/Designers, Layout Types, Chart Types, Customizable Items, Appointments/Scheduling, Reminders/Alerts, Workflow Automation, File Management, Systems/Administrative, Cybersecurity Features, Disaster Recovery, Integration Options, After-Sales Service, Limits. In our feature comparison of Infor Birst vs. Looker, Looker offers more of the most popular features and tools than Infor Birst.
In our pricing comparison of Infor Birst vs. Looker, Looker's pricing starts at $5000/month and is more affordable compared to Looker's starting cost of $5000/month.
Our comparison of Infor Birst vs. Looker shows that Infor Birst scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, setup & support, quality of support, ease of admin. Looker scores higher in learning curve, but Infor Birst has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
