In our comparison of IBM Planning Analytics vs. Zoho Analytics, IBM Planning Analytics is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
Experience in building complex models: The user has successfully built complex models in TM1 for both management and statutory accounts. They have applied TM1 in diverse areas such as property valuations, ship building project costing, airline route profitability, currency conversion, activity-based costing, and public finance initiative scenario comparison.
Real-time data consolidation: TM1 allows for real-time consolidation of data, enabling users to see the immediate impact of changes made to budget figures at different levels of the hierarchy. Calculations defined in TM1's rules language can be applied to related values, ensuring accurate and up-to-date results.
Limitations of Planning Analytics Workbench (PAW): The user mentions that PAW may not match the capabilities of Power BI when it comes to dashboarding. However, TM1's modeling and planning capabilities are considered superior to those of Power BI.
Zoho Analytics is groundbreaking! It changed our perception of and behavior with regard to our company data. Its easy-to-use interface and lucid visuals increased productivity for all users, including analysts and executives. We can now quickly identify the main revenue-generating sectors, spot stagnant inventories, and make defensible judgments based on factual information. Although there should be more options for charts and flowcharts, the ones that are already available are very adjustable, so we can customize dashboards to meet our own requirements.
Experience in building complex models: The user has successfully built complex models in TM1 for both management and statutory accounts. They have applied TM1 in diverse areas such as property valuations, ship building project costing, airline route profitability, currency conversion, activity-based costing, and public finance initiative scenario comparison.
Real-time data consolidation: TM1 allows for real-time consolidation of data, enabling users to see the immediate impact of changes made to budget figures at different levels of the hierarchy. Calculations defined in TM1's rules language can be applied to related values, ensuring accurate and up-to-date results.
Limitations of Planning Analytics Workbench (PAW): The user mentions that PAW may not match the capabilities of Power BI when it comes to dashboarding. However, TM1's modeling and planning capabilities are considered superior to those of Power BI.
Not only does Zoho Analytics seamlessly integrate with various Zoho tools, but it also excels in connecting with a diverse range of data sources, services, databases, and repositories. The provision of multiple workspaces further adds to its functionality.
The ease of integration is truly impressive.
It would be beneficial to have the option of linking a single data source to multiple workspaces or establishing multiple connections to a single data source.
Experience in building complex models: The user has successfully built complex models in TM1 for both management and statutory accounts. They have applied TM1 in diverse areas such as property valuations, ship building project costing, airline route profitability, currency conversion, activity-based costing, and public finance initiative scenario comparison.
Real-time data consolidation: TM1 allows for real-time consolidation of data, enabling users to see the immediate impact of changes made to budget figures at different levels of the hierarchy. Calculations defined in TM1's rules language can be applied to related values, ensuring accurate and up-to-date results.
Limitations of Planning Analytics Workbench (PAW): The user mentions that PAW may not match the capabilities of Power BI when it comes to dashboarding. However, TM1's modeling and planning capabilities are considered superior to those of Power BI.
Experience in building complex models: The user has successfully built complex models in TM1 for both management and statutory accounts. They have applied TM1 in diverse areas such as property valuations, ship building project costing, airline route profitability, currency conversion, activity-based costing, and public finance initiative scenario comparison.
Real-time data consolidation: TM1 allows for real-time consolidation of data, enabling users to see the immediate impact of changes made to budget figures at different levels of the hierarchy. Calculations defined in TM1's rules language can be applied to related values, ensuring accurate and up-to-date results.
Limitations of Planning Analytics Workbench (PAW): The user mentions that PAW may not match the capabilities of Power BI when it comes to dashboarding. However, TM1's modeling and planning capabilities are considered superior to those of Power BI.
Zoho Analytics is groundbreaking! It changed our perception of and behavior with regard to our company data. Its easy-to-use interface and lucid visuals increased productivity for all users, including analysts and executives. We can now quickly identify the main revenue-generating sectors, spot stagnant inventories, and make defensible judgments based on factual information. Although there should be more options for charts and flowcharts, the ones that are already available are very adjustable, so we can customize dashboards to meet our own requirements.
Not only does Zoho Analytics seamlessly integrate with various Zoho tools, but it also excels in connecting with a diverse range of data sources, services, databases, and repositories. The provision of multiple workspaces further adds to its functionality.
The ease of integration is truly impressive.
It would be beneficial to have the option of linking a single data source to multiple workspaces or establishing multiple connections to a single data source.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of IBM Planning Analytics vs. Zoho Analytics, IBM Planning Analytics has 31 user reviews and Zoho Analytics has 11. The average star rating for IBM Planning Analytics is 4.35 while Zoho Analytics has an average rating of 4.18. IBM Planning Analytics has more positive reviews than Zoho Analytics. Comparing IBM Planning Analytics vs. Zoho Analytics reviews, IBM Planning Analytics has stronger overall reviews.
IBM Planning Analytics vs. Zoho Analytics both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Data Management, Data Migration, Report Management, Reporting & Analytics, Drag-and-Drop Builders/Designers, Layout Types, Chart Types, Customizable Items, Collaboration Tools, Chat/IM Management, Appointments/Scheduling, Reminders/Alerts, File Management, Systems/Administrative, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Cybersecurity Features, Disaster Recovery, Integration Options, Third-Party Integrations, Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, Zoho, After-Sales Service, Limits. In our feature comparison of IBM Planning Analytics vs. Zoho Analytics, Zoho Analytics offers more of the most popular features and tools than IBM Planning Analytics.
In our pricing comparison of IBM Planning Analytics vs. Zoho Analytics, Zoho Analytics's pricing starts at Free/month and is more affordable compared to Zoho Analytics's starting cost of Free/month.
Our comparison of IBM Planning Analytics vs. Zoho Analytics shows that Zoho Analytics scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, learning curve, quality of support, ease of admin. IBM Planning Analytics scores higher in setup & support, but Zoho Analytics has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
