In our comparison of IBM Planning Analytics vs. TIBCO Jaspersoft, IBM Planning Analytics is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
N/A
* Vendor does not share prices.
Experience in building complex models: The user has successfully built complex models in TM1 for both management and statutory accounts. They have applied TM1 in diverse areas such as property valuations, ship building project costing, airline route profitability, currency conversion, activity-based costing, and public finance initiative scenario comparison.
Real-time data consolidation: TM1 allows for real-time consolidation of data, enabling users to see the immediate impact of changes made to budget figures at different levels of the hierarchy. Calculations defined in TM1's rules language can be applied to related values, ensuring accurate and up-to-date results.
Limitations of Planning Analytics Workbench (PAW): The user mentions that PAW may not match the capabilities of Power BI when it comes to dashboarding. However, TM1's modeling and planning capabilities are considered superior to those of Power BI.
We primarily utilize Jaspersoft for crafting analytical reports. Initially, the product offered significant benefits, especially with its capability to export and print PDF reports.
The user interface is easy to navigate, making report design a straightforward process.
Absence of a cloud platform to share and create customer dashboards.
Experience in building complex models: The user has successfully built complex models in TM1 for both management and statutory accounts. They have applied TM1 in diverse areas such as property valuations, ship building project costing, airline route profitability, currency conversion, activity-based costing, and public finance initiative scenario comparison.
Real-time data consolidation: TM1 allows for real-time consolidation of data, enabling users to see the immediate impact of changes made to budget figures at different levels of the hierarchy. Calculations defined in TM1's rules language can be applied to related values, ensuring accurate and up-to-date results.
Limitations of Planning Analytics Workbench (PAW): The user mentions that PAW may not match the capabilities of Power BI when it comes to dashboarding. However, TM1's modeling and planning capabilities are considered superior to those of Power BI.
We use the product for statewide reporting of Community College applications, handling a substantial volume of 2.3 million applications annually. The system's strong performance has been a significant advantage, but the complexity of report design remains a hurdle.
The system's performance under heavy loads is outstanding, and we seldom encounter performance-related problems.
Designing and creating new reports can be challenging and time-consuming, requiring the dedication of two full-time employees.
Experience in building complex models: The user has successfully built complex models in TM1 for both management and statutory accounts. They have applied TM1 in diverse areas such as property valuations, ship building project costing, airline route profitability, currency conversion, activity-based costing, and public finance initiative scenario comparison.
Real-time data consolidation: TM1 allows for real-time consolidation of data, enabling users to see the immediate impact of changes made to budget figures at different levels of the hierarchy. Calculations defined in TM1's rules language can be applied to related values, ensuring accurate and up-to-date results.
Limitations of Planning Analytics Workbench (PAW): The user mentions that PAW may not match the capabilities of Power BI when it comes to dashboarding. However, TM1's modeling and planning capabilities are considered superior to those of Power BI.
Experience in building complex models: The user has successfully built complex models in TM1 for both management and statutory accounts. They have applied TM1 in diverse areas such as property valuations, ship building project costing, airline route profitability, currency conversion, activity-based costing, and public finance initiative scenario comparison.
Real-time data consolidation: TM1 allows for real-time consolidation of data, enabling users to see the immediate impact of changes made to budget figures at different levels of the hierarchy. Calculations defined in TM1's rules language can be applied to related values, ensuring accurate and up-to-date results.
Limitations of Planning Analytics Workbench (PAW): The user mentions that PAW may not match the capabilities of Power BI when it comes to dashboarding. However, TM1's modeling and planning capabilities are considered superior to those of Power BI.
We primarily utilize Jaspersoft for crafting analytical reports. Initially, the product offered significant benefits, especially with its capability to export and print PDF reports.
The user interface is easy to navigate, making report design a straightforward process.
Absence of a cloud platform to share and create customer dashboards.
We use the product for statewide reporting of Community College applications, handling a substantial volume of 2.3 million applications annually. The system's strong performance has been a significant advantage, but the complexity of report design remains a hurdle.
The system's performance under heavy loads is outstanding, and we seldom encounter performance-related problems.
Designing and creating new reports can be challenging and time-consuming, requiring the dedication of two full-time employees.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of IBM Planning Analytics vs. TIBCO Jaspersoft, IBM Planning Analytics has 31 user reviews and TIBCO Jaspersoft has 8. The average star rating for IBM Planning Analytics is 4.35 while TIBCO Jaspersoft has an average rating of 3.87. IBM Planning Analytics has more positive reviews than TIBCO Jaspersoft. Comparing IBM Planning Analytics vs. TIBCO Jaspersoft reviews, IBM Planning Analytics has stronger overall reviews.
IBM Planning Analytics vs. TIBCO Jaspersoft both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Data Management, Data Migration, Report Management, Reporting & Analytics, Drag-and-Drop Builders/Designers, Layout Types, Chart Types, Customizable Items, Appointments/Scheduling, Reminders/Alerts, Systems/Administrative, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, Supported Technologies. In our feature comparison of IBM Planning Analytics vs. TIBCO Jaspersoft, IBM Planning Analytics offers more of the most popular features and tools than TIBCO Jaspersoft.
In our pricing comparison of IBM Planning Analytics vs. TIBCO Jaspersoft, TIBCO Jaspersoft's pricing starts at 0/month and is more affordable compared to TIBCO Jaspersoft's starting cost of 0/month.
Our comparison of IBM Planning Analytics vs. TIBCO Jaspersoft shows that IBM Planning Analytics scores higher in usability for meets requirements, setup & support. TIBCO Jaspersoft scores higher in ease of use, quality of support, ease of admin, but IBM Planning Analytics has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
