In our comparison of IBM Planning Analytics vs. Looker, Looker is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
Experience in building complex models: The user has successfully built complex models in TM1 for both management and statutory accounts. They have applied TM1 in diverse areas such as property valuations, ship building project costing, airline route profitability, currency conversion, activity-based costing, and public finance initiative scenario comparison.
Real-time data consolidation: TM1 allows for real-time consolidation of data, enabling users to see the immediate impact of changes made to budget figures at different levels of the hierarchy. Calculations defined in TM1's rules language can be applied to related values, ensuring accurate and up-to-date results.
Limitations of Planning Analytics Workbench (PAW): The user mentions that PAW may not match the capabilities of Power BI when it comes to dashboarding. However, TM1's modeling and planning capabilities are considered superior to those of Power BI.
Ability to develop PDTs, plan looks to be emailed out on a particular frequency, and standardize metrics over the board
It's not possible to do a select distinct on through the explore and it's something you have to perform that on the backend.
Experience in building complex models: The user has successfully built complex models in TM1 for both management and statutory accounts. They have applied TM1 in diverse areas such as property valuations, ship building project costing, airline route profitability, currency conversion, activity-based costing, and public finance initiative scenario comparison.
Real-time data consolidation: TM1 allows for real-time consolidation of data, enabling users to see the immediate impact of changes made to budget figures at different levels of the hierarchy. Calculations defined in TM1's rules language can be applied to related values, ensuring accurate and up-to-date results.
Limitations of Planning Analytics Workbench (PAW): The user mentions that PAW may not match the capabilities of Power BI when it comes to dashboarding. However, TM1's modeling and planning capabilities are considered superior to those of Power BI.
An astounding ability to save looks to a dashboard to work with every morning. It is a helpful system for presentation and analysis thanks to the custom calculations, data input adaptability, and the quite unlimited creative chances.
The ability to develop precise data groups by saving data “looks” to dashboards that are customized.
Adding computations with data inside the platform is naturally complicated as compared to the data warehouse.
Experience in building complex models: The user has successfully built complex models in TM1 for both management and statutory accounts. They have applied TM1 in diverse areas such as property valuations, ship building project costing, airline route profitability, currency conversion, activity-based costing, and public finance initiative scenario comparison.
Real-time data consolidation: TM1 allows for real-time consolidation of data, enabling users to see the immediate impact of changes made to budget figures at different levels of the hierarchy. Calculations defined in TM1's rules language can be applied to related values, ensuring accurate and up-to-date results.
Limitations of Planning Analytics Workbench (PAW): The user mentions that PAW may not match the capabilities of Power BI when it comes to dashboarding. However, TM1's modeling and planning capabilities are considered superior to those of Power BI.
Experience in building complex models: The user has successfully built complex models in TM1 for both management and statutory accounts. They have applied TM1 in diverse areas such as property valuations, ship building project costing, airline route profitability, currency conversion, activity-based costing, and public finance initiative scenario comparison.
Real-time data consolidation: TM1 allows for real-time consolidation of data, enabling users to see the immediate impact of changes made to budget figures at different levels of the hierarchy. Calculations defined in TM1's rules language can be applied to related values, ensuring accurate and up-to-date results.
Limitations of Planning Analytics Workbench (PAW): The user mentions that PAW may not match the capabilities of Power BI when it comes to dashboarding. However, TM1's modeling and planning capabilities are considered superior to those of Power BI.
Ability to develop PDTs, plan looks to be emailed out on a particular frequency, and standardize metrics over the board
It's not possible to do a select distinct on through the explore and it's something you have to perform that on the backend.
An astounding ability to save looks to a dashboard to work with every morning. It is a helpful system for presentation and analysis thanks to the custom calculations, data input adaptability, and the quite unlimited creative chances.
The ability to develop precise data groups by saving data “looks” to dashboards that are customized.
Adding computations with data inside the platform is naturally complicated as compared to the data warehouse.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of IBM Planning Analytics vs. Looker, Looker has 37 user reviews and IBM Planning Analytics has 31. The average star rating for Looker is 4.59 while IBM Planning Analytics has an average rating of 4.35. Looker has more positive reviews than IBM Planning Analytics. Comparing IBM Planning Analytics vs. Looker reviews, Looker has stronger overall reviews.
IBM Planning Analytics vs. Looker both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Data Management, Data Migration, Report Management, Reporting & Analytics, Drag-and-Drop Builders/Designers, Layout Types, Chart Types, Customizable Items, Appointments/Scheduling, Reminders/Alerts, Workflow Automation, File Management, Systems/Administrative, Cybersecurity Features, Disaster Recovery, Integration Options, After-Sales Service, Limits. In our feature comparison of IBM Planning Analytics vs. Looker, Looker offers more of the most popular features and tools than IBM Planning Analytics.
In our pricing comparison of IBM Planning Analytics vs. Looker, IBM Planning Analytics's pricing starts at $150/month and is more affordable compared to Looker's starting cost of $5000/month.
Our comparison of IBM Planning Analytics vs. Looker shows that Looker scores higher in usability for ease of use, learning curve, setup & support, quality of support, ease of admin. IBM Planning Analytics scores higher in meets requirements, but Looker has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
