In our comparison of ESET vs. Keeper, ESET is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
This system has been exceptional. Once the license ends, I intend to purchase another one.
Protection from the downloads and the internet while using my computer, the payment option of ESET internet security is safe.
None.
Allows us to share credentials with users assigned to Okta and other SSO systems quickly and easily. Users and teams can easily share credentials, and admins can add new ones. Logging in through SAML is quick and easy, and provisioning is automated using SCIM, which saves time and streamlines the process.
Keeper's easy-to-use and easy-to-administer features solved some problems for us. Account provisioning is also straightforward, and there's no need to spin up additional server instances to manage logins or provision coworkers. We first used Keeper during the early phase of their latest SSO cloud rollout and experienced some difficulties, but admins added features and were highly responsive.
Users are unable to share forms related to identity and payments.
The vendor with the ideal antivirus software out there is ESET. You get ideal security for your money despite the fact that it is costlier.
Updating the virus database is done every day, file system safety is in real time, and installing/managing/handling staffs tools via ERA is possible for system admins.
Paid licenses are quite expensive, apps for iOS devices are lacking, and at times valid web sites are blocked by web access security.
Allows us to share credentials with users assigned to Okta and other SSO systems quickly and easily. Users and teams can easily share credentials, and admins can add new ones. Logging in through SAML is quick and easy, and provisioning is automated using SCIM, which saves time and streamlines the process.
Keeper's easy-to-use and easy-to-administer features solved some problems for us. Account provisioning is also straightforward, and there's no need to spin up additional server instances to manage logins or provision coworkers. We first used Keeper during the early phase of their latest SSO cloud rollout and experienced some difficulties, but admins added features and were highly responsive.
Users are unable to share forms related to identity and payments.
This system has been exceptional. Once the license ends, I intend to purchase another one.
Protection from the downloads and the internet while using my computer, the payment option of ESET internet security is safe.
None.
The vendor with the ideal antivirus software out there is ESET. You get ideal security for your money despite the fact that it is costlier.
Updating the virus database is done every day, file system safety is in real time, and installing/managing/handling staffs tools via ERA is possible for system admins.
Paid licenses are quite expensive, apps for iOS devices are lacking, and at times valid web sites are blocked by web access security.
Allows us to share credentials with users assigned to Okta and other SSO systems quickly and easily. Users and teams can easily share credentials, and admins can add new ones. Logging in through SAML is quick and easy, and provisioning is automated using SCIM, which saves time and streamlines the process.
Keeper's easy-to-use and easy-to-administer features solved some problems for us. Account provisioning is also straightforward, and there's no need to spin up additional server instances to manage logins or provision coworkers. We first used Keeper during the early phase of their latest SSO cloud rollout and experienced some difficulties, but admins added features and were highly responsive.
Users are unable to share forms related to identity and payments.
Allows us to share credentials with users assigned to Okta and other SSO systems quickly and easily. Users and teams can easily share credentials, and admins can add new ones. Logging in through SAML is quick and easy, and provisioning is automated using SCIM, which saves time and streamlines the process.
Keeper's easy-to-use and easy-to-administer features solved some problems for us. Account provisioning is also straightforward, and there's no need to spin up additional server instances to manage logins or provision coworkers. We first used Keeper during the early phase of their latest SSO cloud rollout and experienced some difficulties, but admins added features and were highly responsive.
Users are unable to share forms related to identity and payments.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of ESET vs. Keeper, Keeper has 3 user reviews and ESET has 21. The average star rating for Keeper is 4.66 while ESET has an average rating of 4.66. Keeper has more positive reviews than ESET. Comparing ESET vs. Keeper reviews, Keeper has stronger overall reviews.
ESET vs. Keeper both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Reporting & Analytics, Systems/Administrative, Sync/Refresh, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Device Management, Network Management, Disaster Recovery, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of ESET vs. Keeper, ESET offers more of the most popular features and tools than Keeper.
In our pricing comparison of ESET vs. Keeper, Keeper's pricing starts at $24/month and is more affordable compared to Keeper's starting cost of $24/month.
Our comparison of ESET vs. Keeper shows that ESET scores higher in usability for ease of use, learning curve, setup & support, quality of support. Keeper scores higher in meets requirements, ease of admin, but ESET has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
