In our comparison of Endpoint Protector vs. OmniNet, Endpoint Protector is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
For most businesses, Endpoint Protector is a lifesaver when it comes to managing USB access and averting data leaks. It's a game-changer because we can now readily ban or allow USBs based on individual needs. Even yet, there are still certain license nuances that need to be resolved. The incompatibility with FIPS 140-2 is the largest disappointment. It would be an unbeatable combination of data security if they could create their own FIPS 140-2 USBs or even apply policies to these high-security devices.
Easy to implement
Licensing issues, Missing feature
N/A
For most businesses, Endpoint Protector is a lifesaver when it comes to managing USB access and averting data leaks. It's a game-changer because we can now readily ban or allow USBs based on individual needs. Even yet, there are still certain license nuances that need to be resolved. The incompatibility with FIPS 140-2 is the largest disappointment. It would be an unbeatable combination of data security if they could create their own FIPS 140-2 USBs or even apply policies to these high-security devices.
Easy to implement
Licensing issues, Missing feature
N/A
For most businesses, Endpoint Protector is a lifesaver when it comes to managing USB access and averting data leaks. It's a game-changer because we can now readily ban or allow USBs based on individual needs. Even yet, there are still certain license nuances that need to be resolved. The incompatibility with FIPS 140-2 is the largest disappointment. It would be an unbeatable combination of data security if they could create their own FIPS 140-2 USBs or even apply policies to these high-security devices.
Easy to implement
Licensing issues, Missing feature
For most businesses, Endpoint Protector is a lifesaver when it comes to managing USB access and averting data leaks. It's a game-changer because we can now readily ban or allow USBs based on individual needs. Even yet, there are still certain license nuances that need to be resolved. The incompatibility with FIPS 140-2 is the largest disappointment. It would be an unbeatable combination of data security if they could create their own FIPS 140-2 USBs or even apply policies to these high-security devices.
Easy to implement
Licensing issues, Missing feature
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Endpoint Protector vs. OmniNet, Endpoint Protector has 10 user reviews and OmniNet has 0. The average star rating for Endpoint Protector is 4.7 while OmniNet has an average rating of 0.0. Endpoint Protector has more positive reviews than OmniNet. Comparing Endpoint Protector vs. OmniNet reviews, Endpoint Protector has stronger overall reviews.
Endpoint Protector vs. OmniNet both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Reporting & Analytics, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Device Management, Data Management, Systems/Administrative, Third-Party Integrations, Compliance Accreditations. In our feature comparison of Endpoint Protector vs. OmniNet, Endpoint Protector offers more of the most popular features and tools than OmniNet.
In our pricing comparison of Endpoint Protector vs. OmniNet, OmniNet's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to OmniNet's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of Endpoint Protector vs. OmniNet shows that Endpoint Protector scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, learning curve, setup & support, quality of support, ease of admin. OmniNet scores higher in , but Endpoint Protector has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
