In our comparison of .LRN vs. Sakai, Sakai is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
The LRN Catalyst Platform is a user-friendly platform for managing ethics and compliance that is attractive to the eye. It is an effective tool for yearly compliance training since it is simple to use and has a strong recordkeeping database. But by incorporating an artificially intelligent voiceover program, expanding the selection of images, and introducing more narration, the platform might be made better.
Pleasant to use and easy to navigate and create slides
More reading is needed, limited narration and image selection should be improved
Since 2012, we are using Sakai. It is very much liked by all in our company because of ease of use, accessibility, and reliability. To create quality courses we can have all the tools here with Sakai.
It is a great platform and all who ever used it will definitely recommend it.
The team is very efficient and willing to make it better. They are cooperative, dynamic, talented and committed to make Sakai a real success. Meeting all of the W3C Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 Level A and AA Success Criteria.
You need to wait until the money and resources are available to work on the project you want. Their community is good enough to find out the resources to solve all the issues we ever met on our way.
Vault is a reliable, well-coded platform that rarely causes problems during mergers. It features an excellent diffmerge tool and interfaces with Visual Studio effectively. Because it is stand-alone and offline compatible, this may not work well if a different team member has to upload a file that is checked out. With Vault, branching and forking are not very reliable.
Excellect customer support, option for SSO, third-party integration, training resources available
None
Great opportunity.
Have a trial before making a purchase.
Can be connected to the faculty. The interface is easy to use and browse.
Difficult interface with poor communication.
The LRN Catalyst Platform is a user-friendly platform for managing ethics and compliance that is attractive to the eye. It is an effective tool for yearly compliance training since it is simple to use and has a strong recordkeeping database. But by incorporating an artificially intelligent voiceover program, expanding the selection of images, and introducing more narration, the platform might be made better.
Pleasant to use and easy to navigate and create slides
More reading is needed, limited narration and image selection should be improved
Vault is a reliable, well-coded platform that rarely causes problems during mergers. It features an excellent diffmerge tool and interfaces with Visual Studio effectively. Because it is stand-alone and offline compatible, this may not work well if a different team member has to upload a file that is checked out. With Vault, branching and forking are not very reliable.
Excellect customer support, option for SSO, third-party integration, training resources available
None
Since 2012, we are using Sakai. It is very much liked by all in our company because of ease of use, accessibility, and reliability. To create quality courses we can have all the tools here with Sakai.
It is a great platform and all who ever used it will definitely recommend it.
The team is very efficient and willing to make it better. They are cooperative, dynamic, talented and committed to make Sakai a real success. Meeting all of the W3C Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 Level A and AA Success Criteria.
You need to wait until the money and resources are available to work on the project you want. Their community is good enough to find out the resources to solve all the issues we ever met on our way.
Great opportunity.
Have a trial before making a purchase.
Can be connected to the faculty. The interface is easy to use and browse.
Difficult interface with poor communication.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of .LRN vs. Sakai, Sakai has 17 user reviews and .LRN has 2. The average star rating for Sakai is 4.05 while .LRN has an average rating of 3.5. Sakai has more positive reviews than .LRN. Comparing .LRN vs. Sakai reviews, Sakai has stronger overall reviews.
.LRN vs. Sakai both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Learning Management System (LMS) Features, Course Management, Supported Content Types, Appointments/Scheduling, Customizable Items, Reporting & Analytics, Systems/Administrative, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Integration Options, Third-Party Integrations. In our feature comparison of .LRN vs. Sakai, Sakai offers more of the most popular features and tools than .LRN.
In our pricing comparison of .LRN vs. Sakai, Sakai's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to Sakai's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of .LRN vs. Sakai shows that Sakai scores higher in usability for ease of use, learning curve, setup & support, quality of support, ease of admin. .LRN scores higher in meets requirements, but Sakai has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
