In our comparison of Datapine vs. IBM Planning Analytics, IBM Planning Analytics is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
I value how easy it is to develop and distribute engaging dashboards thanks to the user-friendly design. Additionally, Datapine provides a range of charts to display different indicators, which enables me to more effectively monitor my strategic and operational processes. Additionally, being able to create automated reports frees up my time. For the purpose of creating my own inquiries in the near future, I would like to see more tutorials regarding how to use the SQL box.
Simple interface, very effective, attractive dashboards, and automates reports
Tutorials are'nt given enough
Experience in building complex models: The user has successfully built complex models in TM1 for both management and statutory accounts. They have applied TM1 in diverse areas such as property valuations, ship building project costing, airline route profitability, currency conversion, activity-based costing, and public finance initiative scenario comparison.
Real-time data consolidation: TM1 allows for real-time consolidation of data, enabling users to see the immediate impact of changes made to budget figures at different levels of the hierarchy. Calculations defined in TM1's rules language can be applied to related values, ensuring accurate and up-to-date results.
Limitations of Planning Analytics Workbench (PAW): The user mentions that PAW may not match the capabilities of Power BI when it comes to dashboarding. However, TM1's modeling and planning capabilities are considered superior to those of Power BI.
My team is now more productive because of this trustworthy and user-friendly data visualization and analytics application. It helps us track and evaluate data from many sources in support of our initiative on the sustainability of the automobile sector. Our team finds the real-time dashboards to be a useful solution because they are simple to make and share. Although some of our non-technical users find the SQL box to be too complex, we manage quite fine without it.
Intuitive user interface, easy to create dashboards, variety of templates and efficient
SQL box is too advanced for non-technical users
Experience in building complex models: The user has successfully built complex models in TM1 for both management and statutory accounts. They have applied TM1 in diverse areas such as property valuations, ship building project costing, airline route profitability, currency conversion, activity-based costing, and public finance initiative scenario comparison.
Real-time data consolidation: TM1 allows for real-time consolidation of data, enabling users to see the immediate impact of changes made to budget figures at different levels of the hierarchy. Calculations defined in TM1's rules language can be applied to related values, ensuring accurate and up-to-date results.
Limitations of Planning Analytics Workbench (PAW): The user mentions that PAW may not match the capabilities of Power BI when it comes to dashboarding. However, TM1's modeling and planning capabilities are considered superior to those of Power BI.
I value how easy it is to develop and distribute engaging dashboards thanks to the user-friendly design. Additionally, Datapine provides a range of charts to display different indicators, which enables me to more effectively monitor my strategic and operational processes. Additionally, being able to create automated reports frees up my time. For the purpose of creating my own inquiries in the near future, I would like to see more tutorials regarding how to use the SQL box.
Simple interface, very effective, attractive dashboards, and automates reports
Tutorials are'nt given enough
My team is now more productive because of this trustworthy and user-friendly data visualization and analytics application. It helps us track and evaluate data from many sources in support of our initiative on the sustainability of the automobile sector. Our team finds the real-time dashboards to be a useful solution because they are simple to make and share. Although some of our non-technical users find the SQL box to be too complex, we manage quite fine without it.
Intuitive user interface, easy to create dashboards, variety of templates and efficient
SQL box is too advanced for non-technical users
Experience in building complex models: The user has successfully built complex models in TM1 for both management and statutory accounts. They have applied TM1 in diverse areas such as property valuations, ship building project costing, airline route profitability, currency conversion, activity-based costing, and public finance initiative scenario comparison.
Real-time data consolidation: TM1 allows for real-time consolidation of data, enabling users to see the immediate impact of changes made to budget figures at different levels of the hierarchy. Calculations defined in TM1's rules language can be applied to related values, ensuring accurate and up-to-date results.
Limitations of Planning Analytics Workbench (PAW): The user mentions that PAW may not match the capabilities of Power BI when it comes to dashboarding. However, TM1's modeling and planning capabilities are considered superior to those of Power BI.
Experience in building complex models: The user has successfully built complex models in TM1 for both management and statutory accounts. They have applied TM1 in diverse areas such as property valuations, ship building project costing, airline route profitability, currency conversion, activity-based costing, and public finance initiative scenario comparison.
Real-time data consolidation: TM1 allows for real-time consolidation of data, enabling users to see the immediate impact of changes made to budget figures at different levels of the hierarchy. Calculations defined in TM1's rules language can be applied to related values, ensuring accurate and up-to-date results.
Limitations of Planning Analytics Workbench (PAW): The user mentions that PAW may not match the capabilities of Power BI when it comes to dashboarding. However, TM1's modeling and planning capabilities are considered superior to those of Power BI.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Datapine vs. IBM Planning Analytics, Datapine has 18 user reviews and IBM Planning Analytics has 31. The average star rating for Datapine is 4.94 while IBM Planning Analytics has an average rating of 4.35. Datapine has more positive reviews than IBM Planning Analytics. Comparing Datapine vs. IBM Planning Analytics reviews, Datapine has stronger overall reviews.
Datapine vs. IBM Planning Analytics both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Data Management, Data Migration, Report Management, Reporting & Analytics, Drag-and-Drop Builders/Designers, Layout Types, Chart Types, Customizable Items, Appointments/Scheduling, Reminders/Alerts, Systems/Administrative, Identity and Access Management (IAM). In our feature comparison of Datapine vs. IBM Planning Analytics, Datapine offers more of the most popular features and tools than IBM Planning Analytics.
In our pricing comparison of Datapine vs. IBM Planning Analytics, IBM Planning Analytics's pricing starts at $150/month and is more affordable compared to IBM Planning Analytics's starting cost of $150/month.
Our comparison of Datapine vs. IBM Planning Analytics shows that IBM Planning Analytics scores higher in usability for quality of support. Datapine scores higher in ease of use, meets requirements, learning curve, setup & support, ease of admin, but IBM Planning Analytics has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
