In our comparison of CyberArk vs. Trellix, Trellix is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
For the PAS application, its scalability and redundancy options are outstanding. Adding another server behind the load balancer is a breeze. Regarding the EPM application, its high adjustability and flexibility make it suitable for a wide range of uses.
It has seamlessly transitioned into our production and infrastructure workflows after strong adoption by our R&D team.
PAS Application: The CPM component lacks easy scalability. Performance issues arise with large deployments. Requests may fail or not execute with a large pool of data.
For a complete security package for the entire company from all threats from any possible direction, this is a great protection tool.
There is protection for all actions over the Internet or even the internal network that connects different machines. It protects the individual machine from all threats from emails, files, other computers, hackers and websites, etc. It also protects the entire network from all ends, internally and external threats as well. It is complete, updated and works seamlessly in the background. It is easy to manage despite being such a comprehensive product. In short, it is one of the best, if not the best security options that are out there.
It is expensive, but then it is really a solution for an enterprise. Some files and software require special permission to open and use, which can be annoying, but a price for protection. The system slows down, and the PCs especially do experience a slower relaunch time.
The product effectively solves the challenge of integrating Cyberark with internal applications, allowing for session monitoring and identifying any unauthorized activity. It also facilitates onboarding of accounts and safes to streamline server administration tasks within the tool.
One of the standout features I like is the Privileged Session Manager (PSM) which allows monitoring of user connectivity in the backend. Additionally, the Central Policy Manager (CPM) is excellent for handling password management across required and pre-defined platforms.
One potential drawback is that beginners may find it challenging to start working with and learning the tool. However, once familiarized, it offers a great platform for development and exploration.
A cost-effective, simple and flexible app.
I don’t like auto re-start and pop-ups.
For the PAS application, its scalability and redundancy options are outstanding. Adding another server behind the load balancer is a breeze. Regarding the EPM application, its high adjustability and flexibility make it suitable for a wide range of uses.
It has seamlessly transitioned into our production and infrastructure workflows after strong adoption by our R&D team.
PAS Application: The CPM component lacks easy scalability. Performance issues arise with large deployments. Requests may fail or not execute with a large pool of data.
The product effectively solves the challenge of integrating Cyberark with internal applications, allowing for session monitoring and identifying any unauthorized activity. It also facilitates onboarding of accounts and safes to streamline server administration tasks within the tool.
One of the standout features I like is the Privileged Session Manager (PSM) which allows monitoring of user connectivity in the backend. Additionally, the Central Policy Manager (CPM) is excellent for handling password management across required and pre-defined platforms.
One potential drawback is that beginners may find it challenging to start working with and learning the tool. However, once familiarized, it offers a great platform for development and exploration.
For a complete security package for the entire company from all threats from any possible direction, this is a great protection tool.
There is protection for all actions over the Internet or even the internal network that connects different machines. It protects the individual machine from all threats from emails, files, other computers, hackers and websites, etc. It also protects the entire network from all ends, internally and external threats as well. It is complete, updated and works seamlessly in the background. It is easy to manage despite being such a comprehensive product. In short, it is one of the best, if not the best security options that are out there.
It is expensive, but then it is really a solution for an enterprise. Some files and software require special permission to open and use, which can be annoying, but a price for protection. The system slows down, and the PCs especially do experience a slower relaunch time.
A cost-effective, simple and flexible app.
I don’t like auto re-start and pop-ups.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of CyberArk vs. Trellix, Trellix has 28 user reviews and CyberArk has 9. The average star rating for Trellix is 4.32 while CyberArk has an average rating of 4.22. Trellix has more positive reviews than CyberArk. Comparing CyberArk vs. Trellix reviews, Trellix has stronger overall reviews.
CyberArk vs. Trellix both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Reporting & Analytics, Device Management, Network Management, Application Management, Data Management, Systems/Administrative, Configuration Management, Sync/Refresh, Governance, Risk, & Compliance (GRC), Collaboration Tools, Reminders/Alerts, Workflow Automation, Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC) Integrations, Supported Technologies. In our feature comparison of CyberArk vs. Trellix, Trellix offers more of the most popular features and tools than CyberArk.
In our pricing comparison of CyberArk vs. Trellix, Trellix's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to Trellix's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of CyberArk vs. Trellix shows that Trellix scores higher in usability for meets requirements, setup & support, quality of support, ease of admin. CyberArk scores higher in ease of use, but Trellix has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
