In our comparison of ClicData vs. IBM Planning Analytics, IBM Planning Analytics is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
N/A
N/A
I am in control of my data, and I can utilize the app to share it with other businesses. I can make use of the app to present my panels throughout our meetings. This enables me to cooperate on projects with other people and share my data in a clear and straightforward manner.
Presentations
None
Experience in building complex models: The user has successfully built complex models in TM1 for both management and statutory accounts. They have applied TM1 in diverse areas such as property valuations, ship building project costing, airline route profitability, currency conversion, activity-based costing, and public finance initiative scenario comparison.
Real-time data consolidation: TM1 allows for real-time consolidation of data, enabling users to see the immediate impact of changes made to budget figures at different levels of the hierarchy. Calculations defined in TM1's rules language can be applied to related values, ensuring accurate and up-to-date results.
Limitations of Planning Analytics Workbench (PAW): The user mentions that PAW may not match the capabilities of Power BI when it comes to dashboarding. However, TM1's modeling and planning capabilities are considered superior to those of Power BI.
It's possible to quickly and simply analyze the data in databases with this tool. Although the interface is user-friendly, at times it can be complicated. Overall, it is an effective tool for drawing conclusions from data.
Quick and easy to use
The interface is complicated sometimes
Experience in building complex models: The user has successfully built complex models in TM1 for both management and statutory accounts. They have applied TM1 in diverse areas such as property valuations, ship building project costing, airline route profitability, currency conversion, activity-based costing, and public finance initiative scenario comparison.
Real-time data consolidation: TM1 allows for real-time consolidation of data, enabling users to see the immediate impact of changes made to budget figures at different levels of the hierarchy. Calculations defined in TM1's rules language can be applied to related values, ensuring accurate and up-to-date results.
Limitations of Planning Analytics Workbench (PAW): The user mentions that PAW may not match the capabilities of Power BI when it comes to dashboarding. However, TM1's modeling and planning capabilities are considered superior to those of Power BI.
I am in control of my data, and I can utilize the app to share it with other businesses. I can make use of the app to present my panels throughout our meetings. This enables me to cooperate on projects with other people and share my data in a clear and straightforward manner.
Presentations
None
It's possible to quickly and simply analyze the data in databases with this tool. Although the interface is user-friendly, at times it can be complicated. Overall, it is an effective tool for drawing conclusions from data.
Quick and easy to use
The interface is complicated sometimes
Experience in building complex models: The user has successfully built complex models in TM1 for both management and statutory accounts. They have applied TM1 in diverse areas such as property valuations, ship building project costing, airline route profitability, currency conversion, activity-based costing, and public finance initiative scenario comparison.
Real-time data consolidation: TM1 allows for real-time consolidation of data, enabling users to see the immediate impact of changes made to budget figures at different levels of the hierarchy. Calculations defined in TM1's rules language can be applied to related values, ensuring accurate and up-to-date results.
Limitations of Planning Analytics Workbench (PAW): The user mentions that PAW may not match the capabilities of Power BI when it comes to dashboarding. However, TM1's modeling and planning capabilities are considered superior to those of Power BI.
Experience in building complex models: The user has successfully built complex models in TM1 for both management and statutory accounts. They have applied TM1 in diverse areas such as property valuations, ship building project costing, airline route profitability, currency conversion, activity-based costing, and public finance initiative scenario comparison.
Real-time data consolidation: TM1 allows for real-time consolidation of data, enabling users to see the immediate impact of changes made to budget figures at different levels of the hierarchy. Calculations defined in TM1's rules language can be applied to related values, ensuring accurate and up-to-date results.
Limitations of Planning Analytics Workbench (PAW): The user mentions that PAW may not match the capabilities of Power BI when it comes to dashboarding. However, TM1's modeling and planning capabilities are considered superior to those of Power BI.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of ClicData vs. IBM Planning Analytics, ClicData has 15 user reviews and IBM Planning Analytics has 31. The average star rating for ClicData is 4.6 while IBM Planning Analytics has an average rating of 4.35. ClicData has more positive reviews than IBM Planning Analytics. Comparing ClicData vs. IBM Planning Analytics reviews, ClicData has stronger overall reviews.
ClicData vs. IBM Planning Analytics both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Data Management, Data Migration, Reporting & Analytics, Layout Types, Chart Types, Customizable Items, Reminders/Alerts, File Management, Systems/Administrative, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Integration Options, Third-Party Integrations, Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of ClicData vs. IBM Planning Analytics, ClicData offers more of the most popular features and tools than IBM Planning Analytics.
In our pricing comparison of ClicData vs. IBM Planning Analytics, IBM Planning Analytics's pricing starts at 0/month and is more affordable compared to IBM Planning Analytics's starting cost of 0/month.
Our comparison of ClicData vs. IBM Planning Analytics shows that IBM Planning Analytics scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, setup & support, quality of support. ClicData scores higher in learning curve, ease of admin, but IBM Planning Analytics has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
