In our comparison of Board vs. IBM Planning Analytics, IBM Planning Analytics is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
N/A
Flexible set up, customized reports in BOARd and Excel, the smaller size of vendors, integration with SAP, CRM MS Dynamics and Cognos TM1, strong database structure.
Rarely crashes occur due to Excel Add-ins. Datamart is needed to purchase it as a BI tool.
Experience in building complex models: The user has successfully built complex models in TM1 for both management and statutory accounts. They have applied TM1 in diverse areas such as property valuations, ship building project costing, airline route profitability, currency conversion, activity-based costing, and public finance initiative scenario comparison.
Real-time data consolidation: TM1 allows for real-time consolidation of data, enabling users to see the immediate impact of changes made to budget figures at different levels of the hierarchy. Calculations defined in TM1's rules language can be applied to related values, ensuring accurate and up-to-date results.
Limitations of Planning Analytics Workbench (PAW): The user mentions that PAW may not match the capabilities of Power BI when it comes to dashboarding. However, TM1's modeling and planning capabilities are considered superior to those of Power BI.
A user-friendly tool for everyone.
Flexibility is linked with the structure created in implementation at the start.
Experience in building complex models: The user has successfully built complex models in TM1 for both management and statutory accounts. They have applied TM1 in diverse areas such as property valuations, ship building project costing, airline route profitability, currency conversion, activity-based costing, and public finance initiative scenario comparison.
Real-time data consolidation: TM1 allows for real-time consolidation of data, enabling users to see the immediate impact of changes made to budget figures at different levels of the hierarchy. Calculations defined in TM1's rules language can be applied to related values, ensuring accurate and up-to-date results.
Limitations of Planning Analytics Workbench (PAW): The user mentions that PAW may not match the capabilities of Power BI when it comes to dashboarding. However, TM1's modeling and planning capabilities are considered superior to those of Power BI.
Flexible set up, customized reports in BOARd and Excel, the smaller size of vendors, integration with SAP, CRM MS Dynamics and Cognos TM1, strong database structure.
Rarely crashes occur due to Excel Add-ins. Datamart is needed to purchase it as a BI tool.
A user-friendly tool for everyone.
Flexibility is linked with the structure created in implementation at the start.
Experience in building complex models: The user has successfully built complex models in TM1 for both management and statutory accounts. They have applied TM1 in diverse areas such as property valuations, ship building project costing, airline route profitability, currency conversion, activity-based costing, and public finance initiative scenario comparison.
Real-time data consolidation: TM1 allows for real-time consolidation of data, enabling users to see the immediate impact of changes made to budget figures at different levels of the hierarchy. Calculations defined in TM1's rules language can be applied to related values, ensuring accurate and up-to-date results.
Limitations of Planning Analytics Workbench (PAW): The user mentions that PAW may not match the capabilities of Power BI when it comes to dashboarding. However, TM1's modeling and planning capabilities are considered superior to those of Power BI.
Experience in building complex models: The user has successfully built complex models in TM1 for both management and statutory accounts. They have applied TM1 in diverse areas such as property valuations, ship building project costing, airline route profitability, currency conversion, activity-based costing, and public finance initiative scenario comparison.
Real-time data consolidation: TM1 allows for real-time consolidation of data, enabling users to see the immediate impact of changes made to budget figures at different levels of the hierarchy. Calculations defined in TM1's rules language can be applied to related values, ensuring accurate and up-to-date results.
Limitations of Planning Analytics Workbench (PAW): The user mentions that PAW may not match the capabilities of Power BI when it comes to dashboarding. However, TM1's modeling and planning capabilities are considered superior to those of Power BI.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Board vs. IBM Planning Analytics, Board has 42 user reviews and IBM Planning Analytics has 31. The average star rating for Board is 4.40 while IBM Planning Analytics has an average rating of 4.35. Board has more positive reviews than IBM Planning Analytics. Comparing Board vs. IBM Planning Analytics reviews, Board has stronger overall reviews.
Board vs. IBM Planning Analytics both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Data Management, Data Migration, Report Management, Reporting & Analytics, Drag-and-Drop Builders/Designers, Layout Types, Chart Types, Customizable Items, Collaboration Tools, Appointments/Scheduling, Reminders/Alerts, File Management, Systems/Administrative, Language & Speech, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Third-Party Integrations, Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, After-Sales Service, Supported Technologies. In our feature comparison of Board vs. IBM Planning Analytics, Board offers more of the most popular features and tools than IBM Planning Analytics.
In our pricing comparison of Board vs. IBM Planning Analytics, IBM Planning Analytics's pricing starts at 0/month and is more affordable compared to IBM Planning Analytics's starting cost of 0/month.
Our comparison of Board vs. IBM Planning Analytics shows that IBM Planning Analytics scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, setup & support. Board scores higher in learning curve, quality of support, ease of admin, but IBM Planning Analytics has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
