In our comparison of CylanceENDPOINT vs. Trellix, Trellix is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
This cybersecurity solution is excellent, in my opinion. It offers thorough coverage for a range of operating systems and is simple to install and maintain across a big network of devices. A significant benefit is the simplicity with which whitelists can be established up and mass quarantined. Reporting on and keeping an eye on malware families and threat patterns is made simple by the intuitive console. But occasionally, the script module might generate false positives, and if you're not careful, handling exceptions can be challenging. Real-time sandbox features are something else I would want to see included in the product.
Easy to deploy and manage policies, has coverage for various OS platforms, bulk quarantine across all hosts for a known threat and user friendly console for reporting
No real-time sandbox capabilities and false positive for the script module and could get tricky
For a complete security package for the entire company from all threats from any possible direction, this is a great protection tool.
There is protection for all actions over the Internet or even the internal network that connects different machines. It protects the individual machine from all threats from emails, files, other computers, hackers and websites, etc. It also protects the entire network from all ends, internally and external threats as well. It is complete, updated and works seamlessly in the background. It is easy to manage despite being such a comprehensive product. In short, it is one of the best, if not the best security options that are out there.
It is expensive, but then it is really a solution for an enterprise. Some files and software require special permission to open and use, which can be annoying, but a price for protection. The system slows down, and the PCs especially do experience a slower relaunch time.
n/a
CylanceProtect has consistently been regarded as the top choice for endpoint protection in the market. It offers exceptional security for both Windows and Mac endpoints, delivering outstanding protection.
However, since its acquisition by Blackberry in 2019, the integration of the two companies has been somewhat clumsy. While the Cylance website dashboard was clean and user-friendly, the Blackberry website design feels outdated. Additionally, there have been delays in releasing the endpoint client for Mac OS Big Sur, which should have been available earlier with Catalina. The frequent false positives for Adobe CS updates have also been a source of frustration. As our licensing is set to expire next summer, I will be exploring alternative options
A cost-effective, simple and flexible app.
I don’t like auto re-start and pop-ups.
This cybersecurity solution is excellent, in my opinion. It offers thorough coverage for a range of operating systems and is simple to install and maintain across a big network of devices. A significant benefit is the simplicity with which whitelists can be established up and mass quarantined. Reporting on and keeping an eye on malware families and threat patterns is made simple by the intuitive console. But occasionally, the script module might generate false positives, and if you're not careful, handling exceptions can be challenging. Real-time sandbox features are something else I would want to see included in the product.
Easy to deploy and manage policies, has coverage for various OS platforms, bulk quarantine across all hosts for a known threat and user friendly console for reporting
No real-time sandbox capabilities and false positive for the script module and could get tricky
n/a
CylanceProtect has consistently been regarded as the top choice for endpoint protection in the market. It offers exceptional security for both Windows and Mac endpoints, delivering outstanding protection.
However, since its acquisition by Blackberry in 2019, the integration of the two companies has been somewhat clumsy. While the Cylance website dashboard was clean and user-friendly, the Blackberry website design feels outdated. Additionally, there have been delays in releasing the endpoint client for Mac OS Big Sur, which should have been available earlier with Catalina. The frequent false positives for Adobe CS updates have also been a source of frustration. As our licensing is set to expire next summer, I will be exploring alternative options
For a complete security package for the entire company from all threats from any possible direction, this is a great protection tool.
There is protection for all actions over the Internet or even the internal network that connects different machines. It protects the individual machine from all threats from emails, files, other computers, hackers and websites, etc. It also protects the entire network from all ends, internally and external threats as well. It is complete, updated and works seamlessly in the background. It is easy to manage despite being such a comprehensive product. In short, it is one of the best, if not the best security options that are out there.
It is expensive, but then it is really a solution for an enterprise. Some files and software require special permission to open and use, which can be annoying, but a price for protection. The system slows down, and the PCs especially do experience a slower relaunch time.
A cost-effective, simple and flexible app.
I don’t like auto re-start and pop-ups.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of CylanceENDPOINT vs. Trellix, Trellix has 28 user reviews and CylanceENDPOINT has 10. The average star rating for Trellix is 4.32 while CylanceENDPOINT has an average rating of 4. Trellix has more positive reviews than CylanceENDPOINT. Comparing CylanceENDPOINT vs. Trellix reviews, Trellix has stronger overall reviews.
CylanceENDPOINT vs. Trellix both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Reporting & Analytics, Device Management, Network Management, Application Management, Data Management, Governance, Risk, & Compliance (GRC), Systems/Administrative, Configuration Management, Sync/Refresh, Collaboration Tools, Reminders/Alerts, Workflow Automation, Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC) Integrations, Supported Technologies. In our feature comparison of CylanceENDPOINT vs. Trellix, Trellix offers more of the most popular features and tools than CylanceENDPOINT.
In our pricing comparison of CylanceENDPOINT vs. Trellix, Trellix's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to Trellix's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of CylanceENDPOINT vs. Trellix shows that CylanceENDPOINT scores higher in usability for ease of use, learning curve, ease of admin. Trellix scores higher in meets requirements, setup & support, quality of support, but CylanceENDPOINT has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
