In our comparison of Altair vs. IBM Planning Analytics, IBM Planning Analytics is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
N/A
Altair's packages address challenges in various interdisciplinary domains, including structural, thermal, electrical, electromagnetic, acoustics, and vibrations. The accurate prediction of results provided by Altair's software contributes to reducing prototype costs, which is a significant benefit in the development process.
I find the HyperMesh tool from Altair to be highly effective in meshing plastic and BIW components, especially when compared to other software options. Additionally, Altair's Optistruct solver stands out as the best choice for performing static analysis.
While Altair's software offers excellent capabilities, there is still room for improvement, particularly in the area of contact and material modeling. In some static cases, I encountered issues where the contacts were not functioning effectively.
Experience in building complex models: The user has successfully built complex models in TM1 for both management and statutory accounts. They have applied TM1 in diverse areas such as property valuations, ship building project costing, airline route profitability, currency conversion, activity-based costing, and public finance initiative scenario comparison.
Real-time data consolidation: TM1 allows for real-time consolidation of data, enabling users to see the immediate impact of changes made to budget figures at different levels of the hierarchy. Calculations defined in TM1's rules language can be applied to related values, ensuring accurate and up-to-date results.
Limitations of Planning Analytics Workbench (PAW): The user mentions that PAW may not match the capabilities of Power BI when it comes to dashboarding. However, TM1's modeling and planning capabilities are considered superior to those of Power BI.
Altair's packages address challenges in various interdisciplinary domains, including structural, thermal, electrical, electromagnetic, acoustics, and vibrations. The accurate prediction of results provided by Altair's software contributes to reducing prototype costs, which is a significant benefit in the development process.
I find the HyperMesh tool from Altair to be highly effective in meshing plastic and BIW components, especially when compared to other software options. Additionally, Altair's Optistruct solver stands out as the best choice for performing static analysis.
While Altair's software offers excellent capabilities, there is still room for improvement, particularly in the area of contact and material modeling. In some static cases, I encountered issues where the contacts were not functioning effectively.
Experience in building complex models: The user has successfully built complex models in TM1 for both management and statutory accounts. They have applied TM1 in diverse areas such as property valuations, ship building project costing, airline route profitability, currency conversion, activity-based costing, and public finance initiative scenario comparison.
Real-time data consolidation: TM1 allows for real-time consolidation of data, enabling users to see the immediate impact of changes made to budget figures at different levels of the hierarchy. Calculations defined in TM1's rules language can be applied to related values, ensuring accurate and up-to-date results.
Limitations of Planning Analytics Workbench (PAW): The user mentions that PAW may not match the capabilities of Power BI when it comes to dashboarding. However, TM1's modeling and planning capabilities are considered superior to those of Power BI.
Altair's packages address challenges in various interdisciplinary domains, including structural, thermal, electrical, electromagnetic, acoustics, and vibrations. The accurate prediction of results provided by Altair's software contributes to reducing prototype costs, which is a significant benefit in the development process.
I find the HyperMesh tool from Altair to be highly effective in meshing plastic and BIW components, especially when compared to other software options. Additionally, Altair's Optistruct solver stands out as the best choice for performing static analysis.
While Altair's software offers excellent capabilities, there is still room for improvement, particularly in the area of contact and material modeling. In some static cases, I encountered issues where the contacts were not functioning effectively.
Altair's packages address challenges in various interdisciplinary domains, including structural, thermal, electrical, electromagnetic, acoustics, and vibrations. The accurate prediction of results provided by Altair's software contributes to reducing prototype costs, which is a significant benefit in the development process.
I find the HyperMesh tool from Altair to be highly effective in meshing plastic and BIW components, especially when compared to other software options. Additionally, Altair's Optistruct solver stands out as the best choice for performing static analysis.
While Altair's software offers excellent capabilities, there is still room for improvement, particularly in the area of contact and material modeling. In some static cases, I encountered issues where the contacts were not functioning effectively.
Experience in building complex models: The user has successfully built complex models in TM1 for both management and statutory accounts. They have applied TM1 in diverse areas such as property valuations, ship building project costing, airline route profitability, currency conversion, activity-based costing, and public finance initiative scenario comparison.
Real-time data consolidation: TM1 allows for real-time consolidation of data, enabling users to see the immediate impact of changes made to budget figures at different levels of the hierarchy. Calculations defined in TM1's rules language can be applied to related values, ensuring accurate and up-to-date results.
Limitations of Planning Analytics Workbench (PAW): The user mentions that PAW may not match the capabilities of Power BI when it comes to dashboarding. However, TM1's modeling and planning capabilities are considered superior to those of Power BI.
Experience in building complex models: The user has successfully built complex models in TM1 for both management and statutory accounts. They have applied TM1 in diverse areas such as property valuations, ship building project costing, airline route profitability, currency conversion, activity-based costing, and public finance initiative scenario comparison.
Real-time data consolidation: TM1 allows for real-time consolidation of data, enabling users to see the immediate impact of changes made to budget figures at different levels of the hierarchy. Calculations defined in TM1's rules language can be applied to related values, ensuring accurate and up-to-date results.
Limitations of Planning Analytics Workbench (PAW): The user mentions that PAW may not match the capabilities of Power BI when it comes to dashboarding. However, TM1's modeling and planning capabilities are considered superior to those of Power BI.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Altair vs. IBM Planning Analytics, IBM Planning Analytics has 31 user reviews and Altair has 1. The average star rating for IBM Planning Analytics is 4.35 while Altair has an average rating of 4. IBM Planning Analytics has more positive reviews than Altair. Comparing Altair vs. IBM Planning Analytics reviews, IBM Planning Analytics has stronger overall reviews.
Altair vs. IBM Planning Analytics both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Data Management, Data Migration, Report Management, Reporting & Analytics, Drag-and-Drop Builders/Designers, Layout Types, Chart Types, Customizable Items, Appointments/Scheduling, Reminders/Alerts, File Management, Systems/Administrative, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Cybersecurity Features, Disaster Recovery, Integration Options, Third-Party Integrations, Microsoft 365, After-Sales Service, Supported Technologies. In our feature comparison of Altair vs. IBM Planning Analytics, Altair offers more of the most popular features and tools than IBM Planning Analytics.
In our pricing comparison of Altair vs. IBM Planning Analytics, IBM Planning Analytics's pricing starts at 0/month and is more affordable compared to IBM Planning Analytics's starting cost of 0/month.
Our comparison of Altair vs. IBM Planning Analytics shows that IBM Planning Analytics scores higher in usability for ease of use, setup & support, quality of support, ease of admin. Altair scores higher in meets requirements, but IBM Planning Analytics has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
